Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The effect of non-obstetric invasive procedures during pregnancy on perinatal outcomes

  • Maternal-Fetal Medicine
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the effect of non-obstetric invasive procedure during pregnancy on perinatal outcome.

Methods

The present retrospective study investigated perinatal outcome in women that underwent an invasive procedure during one of their pregnancies (n = 61); perinatal outcome was compared to other pregnancies (without an invasive procedure) of the same patients (n = 122).

Results

Women with a non-obstetric invasive procedure during pregnancy delivered earlier than those in the comparison group (38.5 vs. 40.0 weeks; p = 0.01) and had a significantly higher rate of cesarean sections (18 vs. 5 cases; p < 0.01). In addition, birth weight was significantly lower in patients undergoing invasive procedures during pregnancy (2908.65 vs. 3185.84 gr; p = 0.02). The absolute rate of prematurity (<37 weeks) was non-significantly higher in the study group (18.3 vs. 10.0 %; p = 0.28).

Conclusion

Non-obstetric invasive procedures are associated with an increased rate of cesarean sections and lower birth weight. Nevertheless, no significant differences in early perinatal outcome were found in comparison to other pregnancies of the same patients. More studies are needed to evaluate the outcome following specific procedures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mazze RI, Källén B (1989) Reproductive outcome after anesthesia and operation during pregnancy: a registry study of 5405 cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol 161:1178

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. de Bakker JK, Dijksman LM, Donkervoort SC (2011) Safety and outcome of general surgical open and laparoscopic procedures during pregnancy. Surg Endosc 25:1574–1578

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Jeong JS, Ryu DH, Yun HY, Jeong EH, Choi JW, Jang LC (2011) Laparoscopic appendectomy is a safe and beneficial procedure in pregnant women. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 21:24–27

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Corneille MG, Gallup TM, Bening T, Wolf SE, Brougher C, Myers JG, Dent DL, Medrano G, Xenakis E, Stewart RM (2010) The use of laparoscopic surgery in pregnancy: evaluation of safety and efficacy. Am J Surg 200:363–367

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Choi JJ, Mustafa R, Lynn ET, Divino CM (2011) Appendectomy during pregnancy: follow-up of progeny. J Am Coll Surg 213:627–632

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Freeland M, King E, Safcsak K, Durham R (2009) Diagnosis of appendicitis in pregnancy. Am J Surg 198:753–758

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Tan KH, Chen KC, Wang TL, Chong CF, Chen CC (2010) Ovarian cystic teratoma torsion in pregnancy. Emerg Med J 27:879–880

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hoover K, Jenkins TR (2011) Evaluation and management of adnexal mass in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 205:97–102

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hoşcan MB, Ekinci M, Tunçkıran A, Oksay T, Özorak A, Özkardeş H (2012) Management of symptomatic ureteral calculi complicating pregnancy. Urology 80:1011–1014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Haider Z, Condous G, Kirk E, Mukri F, Bourne T (2007) The simple outpatient management of Bartholin’s abscess using the Word catheter: a preliminary study. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 47:137–140

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 474 (2011) Nonobstetric surgery during pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 117:420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cohen-Kerem R, Railton C, Oren D, Lishner M, Koren G (2005) Pregnancy outcome following non-obstetric surgical intervention. Am J Surg 190:467–473

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Olsen EA, Brambrink AM (2013) Anesthetic neurotoxicity in the newborn and infant. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol [Epub ahead of print]

  14. Davidson AJ (2011) Anesthesia and neurotoxicity to the developing brain: the clinical relevance. Paediatr Anaesth 21(7):716–721

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Biscette S, Yoost J, Hertweck P, Reinstine J (2001) Laparoscopy in pregnancy and the pediatric patient. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 38:757–776

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Soriano D, Yefet Y, Seidman DS, Goldenberg M, Mashiach S, Oelsner G (1999) Laparoscopy versus laparotomy in the management of adnexal masses during pregnancy. Fertil Steril 71:955

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Fatum M, Rojansky N (2001) Laparoscopic surgery during pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol Surv 56:50

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Erekson EA, Brousseau EC, Dick-Biascoechea MA, Ciarleglio MM, Lockwood CJ, Pettker CM (2012) Maternal postoperative complications after nonobstetric antenatal surgery. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 25:2639–2644

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Silvestri MT, Pettker CM, Brousseau EC, Dick MA, Ciarleglio MM, Erekson EA (2011) Morbidity of appendectomy and cholecystectomy in pregnant and nonpregnant women. Obstet Gynecol 118:1261–1270

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. ACOG Practice Bulletin (2001) Assessment of risk factors for preterm birth. Clinical management guidelines for obstetrician-gynecologists. Number 31, October 2001. Obstet Gynecol 98:709–716

    Google Scholar 

  21. ACOG practice bulletin (2003) Management of preterm labor. Number 43. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 82:127–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Abbasi N, Patenaude V, Abenhaim HA (2014) Evaluation of obstetrical and fetal outcomes in pregnancies complicated by acute appendicitis. Arch Gynecol Obstet 290(4):661–667

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Sheiner E, Levy A, Silverberg D, Menes TS, Levy I, Katz M, Mazor M (2004) Pregnancy after bariatric surgery is not associated with adverse perinatal outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 190(5):1335–1340

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Willis K, Lieberman N, Sheiner E (2015) Pregnancy and neonatal outcome after bariatric surgery. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 29(1):133–144

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Polina Schwarzman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schwarzman, P., Baumfeld, Y., Bar-Niv, Z. et al. The effect of non-obstetric invasive procedures during pregnancy on perinatal outcomes. Arch Gynecol Obstet 292, 603–608 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-015-3689-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-015-3689-y

Keywords

Navigation