Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparison of efficacy of bromocriptine and cabergoline to GnRH agonist in a rat endometriosis model

  • General Gynecology
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To determine the effect of dopamine agonists in a surgically induced endometriosis model on rats.

Study design

In this prospective randomized experimental study, surgical induction of endometriosis was performed by autotransplantation technique on 52 adult female Wistar-Albino rats. Endometriosis formation was confirmed by a second-look laparotomy (n:48) 1 month later. Four study groups were randomly generated according to their treatment regimens: group 1 (leuprolide acetate, n = 12), group 2 (bromocriptine, n = 12), group 3 (cabergoline, n = 12) and group 4 (control, n = 12). Endometriotic implants were excised for histopathological examination after treatment at the setting of laparotomy. The mean surface areas and histopathological glandular tissue (GT) and stromal tissue (ST) scores of endometriotic implants were studied and compared among groups.

Results

After 30 days of treatment, the mean surface area of the endometriotic implants of leuprolide acetate, bromocriptine and cabergoline groups was significantly decreased. The regression of endometriotic foci size in comparison to control was highest in group 1, followed by group 2, then group 3. In the histopathological evaluation both the ST and GT scores of group 1, 2 and 3 were significantly decreased in comparison to controls without a statistically significant difference between the groups.

Conclusion

Dopamine agonists are as effective as GnRH agonists in the regression of experimental endometriotic implants in rats. Further trials are needed to elucidate the pathways affected by dopamine agonists.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Giudice LC, Kao LC (2004) Endometriosis. Lancet 364(9447):1789–1799

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bulun SE (2009) Endometriosis. N Engl J Med 360(3):268–279

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Soares SR, Martínez-Varea A, Hidalgo-Mora JJ, Pellicer A (2012) Pharmacologic therapies in endometriosis: a systematic review. Fertil Steril 98(3):529–555

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rock JA, Zacur HA, Dlugi AM, Jones HW Jr, TeLinde RW (1982) Pregnancy success following surgical correction of imperforate hymen and complete transverse vaginal septum. Obstet Gynecol 59(4):448–451

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lucidi RS, Witz CA, Chrisco M, Binkley PA, Shain SA, Schenken RS (2005) A novel in vitro model of the early endometriotic lesion demonstrates that attachment of endometrial cells to mesothelial cells is dependent on the source of endometrial cells. Fertil Steril 84(1):16–21

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Schenken RS (2012) Pathogenesis, clinical features, and diagnosis of endometriosis. http://pmtwww.uptodate.com/contents/pathogenesis-clinical-features-and-diagnosis-of-endometriosis. Accessed 23 Dec 2012

  7. Laschke MW, Menger MD (2012) Anti-angiogenic treatment strategies for the therapy of endometriosis. Hum Reprod Update 18(6):682–702

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhang JJ, Xu ZM, Dai HY, Ji XQ, Duan YY, Zhang CM, Qin DY (2010) Application of the nuclear factor-κB inhibitor pyrrolidine dithiocarbamate for the treatment of endometriosis: an in vitro study. Fertil Steril 94(7):2942–2944

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hull ML, Charnock-Jones DS, Chan CL, Bruner-Tran KL, Osteen KG, Tom BD, Fan TP, Smith SK (2003) Antiangiogenic agents are effective inhibitors of endometriosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 88(6):2889–2899

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Basu S, Nagy JA, Pal S, Vasile E, Eckelhoefer IA, Bliss VS, Manseau EJ, Dasgupta PS, Dvorak HF, Mukhopadhyay D (2001) The neurotransmitter dopamine inhibits angiogenesis induced by vascular permeability factor/vascular endothelial growth factor. Nat Med 7(5):569–574

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Alvarez C, Martí-Bonmatí L, Novella-Maestre E, Sanz R, Gómez R, Fernández-Sánchez M, Simón C, Pellicer A (2007) Dopamine agonist cabergoline reduces hemoconcentration and ascites in hyperstimulated women undergoing assisted reproduction. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 92(8):2931–2937

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Novella-Maestre E, Carda C, Noguera I, Ruiz-Saurí A, García-Velasco JA, Simón C, Pellicer A (2009) Dopamine agonist administration causes a reduction in endometrial implants through modulation of angiogenesis in experimentally induced endometriosis. Hum Reprod 24(5):1025–1035

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Vernon MW, Wilson EA (1985) Studies on the surgical induction of endometriosis in the rat. Fertil Steril 44(5):684–694

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Altintas D, Kokcu A, Kandemir B, Tosun M, Cetinkaya MB (2010) Comparison of the effects of raloxifene and anastrozole on experimental endometriosis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 150(1):84–87

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Witz CA (2002) Pathogenesis of endometriosis. Gynecol Obstet Invest 53(Suppl 1):52–62 (Review)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sampson JA (1927) Peritoneal endometriosis due to menstrual dissemination of endometrial tissue into the peritoneal cavity. Am J Obstet Gynecol 14:422–469

    Google Scholar 

  17. Guo SW (2003) The best-fit model for endometriosis. Fertil Steril 80(1):232

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Redwine DB (2002) Was Sampson wrong? Fertil Steril 78(4):686–693

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Carmeliet P, Jain RK (2011) Molecular mechanisms and clinical applications of angiogenesis. Nature 473(7347):298–307

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Oosterlynck DJ, Meuleman C, Sobis H, Vandeputte M, Koninckx PR (1993) Angiogenic activity of peritoneal fluid from women with endometriosis. Fertil Steril 59(4):778–782

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Healy DL, Rogers PA, Hii L, Wingfield M (1998) Angiogenesis: a new theory for endometriosis. Hum Reprod Update 4(5):736–740

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Vernon MW, Wilson EA (1985) Studies on the surgical induction of endometriosis in the rat. Fertil Steril 44(5):684–694

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Laschke MW, Giebels C, Nickels RM, Scheuer C, Menger MD (2011) Endothelial progenitor cells contribute to the vascularization of endometriotic lesions. Am J Pathol 178(1):442–450

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Shifren JL, Tseng JF, Zaloudek CJ, Ryan IP, Meng YG, Ferrara N, Jaffe RB, Taylor RN (1996) Ovarian steroid regulation of vascular endothelial growth factor in the human endometrium: implications for angiogenesis during the menstrual cycle and in the pathogenesis of endometriosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 81(8):3112–3118

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Donnez J, Smoes P, Gillerot S, Casanas-Roux F, Nisolle M (1998) Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGA) in endometriosis. Hum Reprod 13(6):1686–1690

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ceyhan ST, Onguru O, Baser I, Gunhan O (2008) Expression of cyclooxygenase-2 and vascular endothelial growth factor in ovarian endometriotic cysts and their relationship with angiogenesis. Fertil Steril 90(4):988–993

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ceyhan ST, Onguru O, Fidan U, Ide T, Yaman H, Kilic S, Baser I (2011) Comparison of aromatase inhibitor (letrozole) and immunomodulators (infliximab and etanercept) on the regression of endometriotic implants in a rat model. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 154(1):100–104

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Jain RK, Duda DG, Clark JW, Loeffler JS (2006) Lessons from phase III clinical trials on anti-VEGA therapy for cancer. Nat Clin Pract Oncol 3(1):24–40

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Becker CM, Sampson DA, Rupnick MA, Rohan RM, Efstathiou JA, Short SM, Taylor GA, Folkman J, D’Amato RJ (2005) Endostatin inhibits the growth of endometriotic lesions but does not affect fertility. Fertil Steril 84(Suppl 2):1144–1155

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Via LE, Gore-Langton RE, Pluda JM (2000) Clinical trials referral resource. Current clinical trials administering the antiangiogenesis agent SU5416. Oncology (Williston Park) 14(9):1312, 1315–6, 1321–3

  31. Gillam MP, Molitch ME, Lombardi G, Colao A (2006) Advances in the treatment of prolactinomas. Endocr Rev 27(5):485–534

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Basu S, Nagy JA, Pal S, Vasile E, Eckelhoefer IA, Bliss VS, Manseau EJ, Dasgupta PS, Dvorak HF, Mukhopadhyay D (2001) The neurotransmitter dopamine inhibits angiogenesis induced by vascular permeability factor/vascular endothelial growth factor. Nat Med 7(5):569–574

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Novella-Maestre E, Carda C, Ruiz-Sauri A, Garcia-Velasco JA, Simon C, Pellicer A (2010) Identification and quantification of dopamine receptor 2 in human eutopic and ectopic endometrium: a novel molecular target for endometriosis therapy. Biol Reprod 83(5):866–873

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Schade R, Andersohn F, Suissa S, Haverkamp W, Garbe E (2007) Dopamine agonists and the risk of cardiac-valve regurgitation. N Engl J Med 356(1):29–38

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Delgado-Rosas F, Gómez R, Ferrero H, Gaytan F, Garcia-Velasco J, Simón C, Pellicer A (2011) The effects of ergot and non-ergot-derived dopamine agonists in an experimental mouse model of endometriosis. Reproduction 142(5):745–755

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Vance ML, Evans WS, Thorner MO (1984) Drugs five years later. Bromocriptine. Ann Intern Med 100(1):78–91

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Góth MI, Hubina E, Raptis S, Nagy GM, Tóth BE (2003) Physiological and pathological angiogenesis in the endocrine system. Microsc Res Tech 60(1):98–106

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Gomez R, Gonzalez-Izquierdo M, Simon C, Remohi J, Pellicer A (2003) Tyroxine hydroxylase (TH) downregulation in hyperstimulated ovaries reveals he dopamine agonist bromocriptine (Br 2) as an effective and specific method to block increased vascular permeability (VP) in OHSS (Abstract O-113). Fertil Steril 80(Suppl 3):43–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Gomez R, Gonzalez-Izquierdo M, Zimmermann RC, Novella-Maestre E, Alonso-Muriel I, Sanchez-Criado J, Remohi J, Simon C, Pellicer A (2006) Low-dose dopamine agonist administration blocks vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGA)-mediated vascular hyperpermeability without altering VEGA receptor 2-dependent luteal angiogenesis in a rat ovarian hyperstimulation model. Endocrinology 147(11):5400–5411

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Brown J, Pan A, Hart RJ (2010) Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogues for pain associated with endometriosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (12):CD008475

Download references

Acknowledgments

Study was supported by GMMA Research Center with the project number AR-2012/14. No funding was received for the trial. The authors acknowledge the assistance and support of Veterinary Dr Sahin SAGALTICI and Dr Osman Tansu TOMBUS during the study.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ugur Keskin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ercan, C.M., Kayaalp, O., Cengiz, M. et al. Comparison of efficacy of bromocriptine and cabergoline to GnRH agonist in a rat endometriosis model. Arch Gynecol Obstet 291, 1103–1111 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-014-3524-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-014-3524-x

Keywords

Navigation