Skip to main content
Log in

Patient-reported quality-of-life and sexual-function outcomes after laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy (LSH) versus total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH): a prospective, questionnaire-based follow-up study in 915 patients

  • General Gynecology
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To compare patient-reported quality-of-life and sexual function outcomes in women after laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy (LSH) or total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) for benign uterine disease.

Methods

Out of a cohort of 1,952 patients from a previous implementation study of LSH and TLH, 1,886 patients who had not undergone intraoperative conversion to laparotomy or were ineligible for other reasons were invited by mail to participate in this prospective, questionnaire-based follow-up study.

Results

Of the 915/1,952 (48.5 %) survey respondents included in the analysis, 788 (86.1 %) and 127 (13.9 %) had undergone LSH or TLH, respectively. Women undergoing LSH reported significantly lower pain levels (p = 0.037) and faster partial (p = 0.015) and complete (p < 0.001) resumption of normal daily activities compared to those undergoing TLH. As regards sexual function, women undergoing LSH resumed sexual activity significantly sooner (p = 0.018), rated sexual desire as higher (p = 0.023), and reported more frequently that their sexual life had improved postoperatively (p = 0.008) than did women undergoing TLH.

Conclusions

Women undergoing LSH for benign uterine disease may have better outcomes regarding certain quality-of-life and sexual function parameters than women undergoing TLH for benign uterine disease.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wallwiener D, Becker S (2004) Perspectives in gynecologic surgery: past, present and future. Gynecol Surg 1(2):63–65. doi:10.1007/s10397-004-0005-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lermann J, Haberle L, Merk S, Henglein K, Beckmann MW, Mueller A, Mehlhorn G (2013) Comparison of prevalence of hypoactive sexual desire disorder (HSDD) in women after five different hysterectomy procedures. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 167(2):210–214. doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.12.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. AAGL practice report: practice guidelines for laparoscopic subtotal/supracervical hysterectomy (LSH) (2014). J Minim Invasive Gynecol 21 (1):9–16. doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2013.08.001

  4. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 388 November 2007: Supracervical hysterectomy (reaffirmed 2013) (2007). Obstet Gynecol 110 (5):1215–1217. doi:10.1097/01.AOG.0000291564.32956.de

  5. Wallwiener M, Taran FA, Rothmund R, Kasperkowiak A, Auwarter G, Ganz A, Kraemer B, Abele H, Schönfisch B, Isaacson KB, Brucker SY (2013) Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy (LSH) versus total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH): an implementation study in 1,952 patients with an analysis of risk factors for conversion to laparotomy and complications, and of procedure-specific re-operations. Arch Gynecol Obstet 288(6):1329–1339. doi:10.1007/s00404-013-2921-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wallwiener D, Becker S, Beckmann MW, Brucker SY, Friese K, Isaacson KB, Jonat W, Wattiez A (eds) (2014) Atlas of gynecologic surgery (trans: Champe GG, O’Sullivan G), 4th edn. Thieme, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  7. World Medical Association (2013) WMA Declaration of Helsinki - ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. http://www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/b3/index.html. Accessed 18 February 2014

  8. Berner MM, Kriston L, Zahradnik HP, Härter M, Rohde A (2004) Überprüfung der Gültigkeit und Zuverlässigkeit des deutschen female sexual function index (FSFI-d) [validity and reliability of the German female sexual function index (FSFI-d)]. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 64(3):293–303. doi:10.1055/s-2004-815815

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Rosen R, Brown C, Heiman J, Leiblum S, Meston C, Shabsigh R, Ferguson D, D’Agostino R Jr (2000) The female sexual function index (FSFI): a multidimensional self-report instrument for the assessment of female sexual function. J Sex Marital Ther 26(2):191–208. doi:10.1080/009262300278597

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Wiegel M, Meston C, Rosen R (2005) The female sexual function index (FSFI): cross-validation and development of clinical cutoff scores. J Sex Marital Ther 31(1):1–20. doi:10.1080/00926230590475206

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. R Core Team (2013) A language and environment for statistical computing. R foundation for statistical computing. http://www.R-project.org/. Accessed 27 March 2014

  12. Lethaby A, Mukhopadhyay A, Naik R (2012) Total versus subtotal hysterectomy for benign gynaecological conditions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:CD004993. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD004993.pub3

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Flory N, Bissonnette F, Amsel RT, Binik YM (2006) The psychosocial outcomes of total and subtotal hysterectomy: a randomized controlled trial. J Sex Med 3(3):483–491. doi:10.1111/j.1743-6109.2006.00229.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ellström Engh MA, Jerhamre K, Junskog K (2010) A randomized trial comparing changes in sexual health and psychological well-being after subtotal and total hysterectomies. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 89(1):65–70. doi:10.3109/00016340903353276

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. El-Mowafi D, Madkour W, Lall C, Wenger JM (2004) Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy versus laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 11(2):175–180

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lyons T (2007) Laparoscopic supracervical versus total hysterectomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 14(3):275–277. doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2006.10.032

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lieng M, Qvigstad E, Istre O, Langebrekke A, Ballard K (2008) Long-term outcomes following laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy. BJOG 115(13):1605–1610. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01854.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Adam Kasperkowiak for excellent technical assistance.

Conflict of interest

We declare that we have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Markus Wallwiener.

Additional information

S. Y. Brucker and F.-A. Taran are equal contributors and joint first authors. D. Wallwiener and M. Wallwiener are equal contributors and joint senior authors.

Appendix

Appendix

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Brucker, S.Y., Taran, FA., Bogdanyova, S. et al. Patient-reported quality-of-life and sexual-function outcomes after laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy (LSH) versus total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH): a prospective, questionnaire-based follow-up study in 915 patients. Arch Gynecol Obstet 290, 1141–1149 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-014-3318-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-014-3318-1

Keywords

Navigation