Abstract
Purpose
To compare patient-reported quality-of-life and sexual function outcomes in women after laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy (LSH) or total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) for benign uterine disease.
Methods
Out of a cohort of 1,952 patients from a previous implementation study of LSH and TLH, 1,886 patients who had not undergone intraoperative conversion to laparotomy or were ineligible for other reasons were invited by mail to participate in this prospective, questionnaire-based follow-up study.
Results
Of the 915/1,952 (48.5 %) survey respondents included in the analysis, 788 (86.1 %) and 127 (13.9 %) had undergone LSH or TLH, respectively. Women undergoing LSH reported significantly lower pain levels (p = 0.037) and faster partial (p = 0.015) and complete (p < 0.001) resumption of normal daily activities compared to those undergoing TLH. As regards sexual function, women undergoing LSH resumed sexual activity significantly sooner (p = 0.018), rated sexual desire as higher (p = 0.023), and reported more frequently that their sexual life had improved postoperatively (p = 0.008) than did women undergoing TLH.
Conclusions
Women undergoing LSH for benign uterine disease may have better outcomes regarding certain quality-of-life and sexual function parameters than women undergoing TLH for benign uterine disease.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Wallwiener D, Becker S (2004) Perspectives in gynecologic surgery: past, present and future. Gynecol Surg 1(2):63–65. doi:10.1007/s10397-004-0005-4
Lermann J, Haberle L, Merk S, Henglein K, Beckmann MW, Mueller A, Mehlhorn G (2013) Comparison of prevalence of hypoactive sexual desire disorder (HSDD) in women after five different hysterectomy procedures. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 167(2):210–214. doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.12.005
AAGL practice report: practice guidelines for laparoscopic subtotal/supracervical hysterectomy (LSH) (2014). J Minim Invasive Gynecol 21 (1):9–16. doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2013.08.001
ACOG Committee Opinion No. 388 November 2007: Supracervical hysterectomy (reaffirmed 2013) (2007). Obstet Gynecol 110 (5):1215–1217. doi:10.1097/01.AOG.0000291564.32956.de
Wallwiener M, Taran FA, Rothmund R, Kasperkowiak A, Auwarter G, Ganz A, Kraemer B, Abele H, Schönfisch B, Isaacson KB, Brucker SY (2013) Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy (LSH) versus total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH): an implementation study in 1,952 patients with an analysis of risk factors for conversion to laparotomy and complications, and of procedure-specific re-operations. Arch Gynecol Obstet 288(6):1329–1339. doi:10.1007/s00404-013-2921-x
Wallwiener D, Becker S, Beckmann MW, Brucker SY, Friese K, Isaacson KB, Jonat W, Wattiez A (eds) (2014) Atlas of gynecologic surgery (trans: Champe GG, O’Sullivan G), 4th edn. Thieme, Stuttgart
World Medical Association (2013) WMA Declaration of Helsinki - ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. http://www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/b3/index.html. Accessed 18 February 2014
Berner MM, Kriston L, Zahradnik HP, Härter M, Rohde A (2004) Überprüfung der Gültigkeit und Zuverlässigkeit des deutschen female sexual function index (FSFI-d) [validity and reliability of the German female sexual function index (FSFI-d)]. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 64(3):293–303. doi:10.1055/s-2004-815815
Rosen R, Brown C, Heiman J, Leiblum S, Meston C, Shabsigh R, Ferguson D, D’Agostino R Jr (2000) The female sexual function index (FSFI): a multidimensional self-report instrument for the assessment of female sexual function. J Sex Marital Ther 26(2):191–208. doi:10.1080/009262300278597
Wiegel M, Meston C, Rosen R (2005) The female sexual function index (FSFI): cross-validation and development of clinical cutoff scores. J Sex Marital Ther 31(1):1–20. doi:10.1080/00926230590475206
R Core Team (2013) A language and environment for statistical computing. R foundation for statistical computing. http://www.R-project.org/. Accessed 27 March 2014
Lethaby A, Mukhopadhyay A, Naik R (2012) Total versus subtotal hysterectomy for benign gynaecological conditions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4:CD004993. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD004993.pub3
Flory N, Bissonnette F, Amsel RT, Binik YM (2006) The psychosocial outcomes of total and subtotal hysterectomy: a randomized controlled trial. J Sex Med 3(3):483–491. doi:10.1111/j.1743-6109.2006.00229.x
Ellström Engh MA, Jerhamre K, Junskog K (2010) A randomized trial comparing changes in sexual health and psychological well-being after subtotal and total hysterectomies. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 89(1):65–70. doi:10.3109/00016340903353276
El-Mowafi D, Madkour W, Lall C, Wenger JM (2004) Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy versus laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 11(2):175–180
Lyons T (2007) Laparoscopic supracervical versus total hysterectomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 14(3):275–277. doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2006.10.032
Lieng M, Qvigstad E, Istre O, Langebrekke A, Ballard K (2008) Long-term outcomes following laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy. BJOG 115(13):1605–1610. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01854.x
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Adam Kasperkowiak for excellent technical assistance.
Conflict of interest
We declare that we have no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
S. Y. Brucker and F.-A. Taran are equal contributors and joint first authors. D. Wallwiener and M. Wallwiener are equal contributors and joint senior authors.
Appendix
Appendix
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brucker, S.Y., Taran, FA., Bogdanyova, S. et al. Patient-reported quality-of-life and sexual-function outcomes after laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy (LSH) versus total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH): a prospective, questionnaire-based follow-up study in 915 patients. Arch Gynecol Obstet 290, 1141–1149 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-014-3318-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-014-3318-1