Skip to main content
Log in

Low-dose methotrexate treatment in ectopic pregnancy: a retrospective analysis of 164 ectopic pregnancies treated between 2000 and 2008

  • General Gynecology
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Ectopic pregnancy is an acute, potentially life-threatening condition. The aim of this study was to compare the results of surgery and methotrexate treatment in women with ectopic pregnancy, along with a review of the literature.

Methods

164 women with ectopic pregnancy, treated from 2000 to 2008 at the university gynecology department, were examined in a retrospective analysis. Patients with diagnosed ectopic pregnancy underwent one of the following treatments: Salpingotomy, salpingectomy or administration of a single dose of 30 mg methotrexate. The main outcome measures were treatment success rate, rate of patients wishing to have children after the ectopic pregnancy, and rates of pregnancy, live births, recurrent ectopic pregnancy, miscarriage, use of assisted reproduction and side effects.

Results

There were no significant differences in success rates between the groups (methotrexate 83.9 %, salpingotomy 88.2 %, salpingectomy 96.8 %). Significantly more patients in the salpingotomy group wished to become pregnant afterward than in the salpingectomy group. No significant differences were observed between the groups in the rates of intrauterine pregnancy, live births, recurrences, miscarriages, or side effects.

Conclusions

With defined inclusion criteria, similar results can be achieved with low-dose single administration of 30 mg methotrexate in comparison with surgical treatment for ectopic pregnancy. On the basis of the data presented here, further research to establish optimal dosages for methotrexate is needed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Marion LL, Meeks GR (2012) Ectopic pregnancy: history, incidence, epidemiology, and risk factors. Clin Obstet Gynecol 55(2):376–386. doi:10.1097/GRF.0b013e3182516d7b

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Feige A, Rempen A, Würfel W, Jawny J, Rohde A (2006) Frauenheilkunde: Fortpflanzungsmedizin, Geburtsmedizin, Onkologie, Psychosomatik, vol 3. Urban und Fischer, München

  3. Oppelt P, Gätje R (2006) Extrauteringravidität, vol 3. Die Gynäkologie, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  4. Merz E (2002) Sonographische Diagnostik in Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe. Geburtshilfe, 2 edn. Thieme Verlag Stuttgart

  5. Chang J, Elam-Evans LD, Berg CJ, Herndon J, Flowers L, Seed KA, Syverson CJ (2003) Pregnancy-related mortality surveillance–United States, 1991–1999. MMWR Surveill Summ 52(2):1–8

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lermann J, Müller A, Schulze C, Becker S, Boosz A, Renner S, Beckmann M (2009) Die Extrauteringravidität. Frauenheilkunde up2date 5:383–402. doi:10.1055/s-0029-1224626

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lermann J, Müller A, Burghaus S, Renner PS, Beckmann MW (2012) Die Extrauteringravidität. Geburtsh Frauenheilk 72:116–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Breckwoldt M, Kaufmann M, Pfleiderer A (2007) Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, vol 5, 5 edn. Thieme, Stuttgart

  9. Casikar I, Reid S, Condous G (2012) Ectopic pregnancy: ultrasound diagnosis in modern management. Clin Obstet Gynecol 55(2):402–409. doi:10.1097/GRF.0b013e31825109bd

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Givens VM, Lipscomb GH (2012) Diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy. Clin Obstet Gynecol 55(2):387–394. doi:10.1097/GRF.0b013e31824e3618

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kirk E (2012) Ultrasound in the diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy. Clin Obstet Gynecol 55(2):395–401. doi:10.1097/GRF.0b013e31824e35fe

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Merz E, Bahlmann F, Weber G, Macchiella D, Kruczynski D, Pollow K, Knapstein PG (1996) Unruptured tubal pregnancy: local low-dose therapy with methotrexate under transvaginal ultrasonographic guidance. Gynecol Obstet Invest 41(2):76–81

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Craig LB, Khan S (2012) Expectant management of ectopic pregnancy. Clin Obstet Gynecol 55(2):461–470. doi:10.1097/GRF.0b013e3182510aba

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Stock L, Milad M (2012) Surgical management of ectopic pregnancy. Clin Obstet Gynecol 55(2):448–454. doi:10.1097/GRF.0b013e3182510a19

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Methotrexate treatment of tubal and interstitial ectopic pregnancy (2013) http://www.uptodate.com

  16. Medicine PCotASfR (2006) Medical treatment of ectopic pregnancy. Fertility Sterility 86 (5 Suppl 1):S96–S102. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.07.1481

  17. Bachman EA, Barnhart K (2012) Medical management of ectopic pregnancy: a comparison of regimens. Clin Obstet Gynecol 55(2):440–447. doi:10.1097/GRF.0b013e3182510a73

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 94: Medical management of ectopic pregnancy (2008) Obstetr Gynecol 111(6):1479–1485. doi:10.1097/AOG.0b013e31817d201e

  19. Menon S, Colins J, Barnhart KT (2007) Establishing a human chorionic gonadotropin cutoff to guide methotrexate treatment of ectopic pregnancy: a systematic review. Fertil Steril 87(3):481–484. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.10.007

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Barnhart KT, Gosman G, Ashby R, Sammel M (2003) The medical management of ectopic pregnancy: a meta-analysis comparing “single dose” and “multidose” regimens. Obstet Gynecol 101(4):778–784. doi:S0029784402031587

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Schäfer D, Kryss J, Pfuhl J, Baumann R (1994) Systemic treatment of ectopic pregnancies with single-dose methotrexate. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 1(3):213–218

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Gervaise A, Masson L, de Tayrac R, Frydman R, Fernandez H (2004) Reproductive outcome after methotrexate treatment of tubal pregnancies. Fertil Steril 82(2):304–308. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.04.023

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Fernandez H, Yves Vincent SC, Pauthier S, Audibert F, Frydman R (1998) Randomized trial of conservative laparoscopic treatment and methotrexate administration in ectopic pregnancy and subsequent fertility. Hum Reprod 13(11):3239–3243

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Stovall TG, Ling FW (1993) Single-dose methotrexate: an expanded clinical trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 168(6 Pt 1):1759–1762 discussion 1762-1755

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Juneau C, Bates GW (2012) Reproductive outcomes after medical and surgical management of ectopic pregnancy. Clin Obstet Gynecol 55(2):455–460. doi:10.1097/GRF.0b013e3182510a88

    Google Scholar 

  26. Bangsgaard N, Lund CO, Ottesen B, Nilas L (2003) Improved fertility following conservative surgical treatment of ectopic pregnancy. BJOG Int J Obstetr Gynaecol 110(8):765–770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Bouyer J, Job-Spira N, Pouly JL, Coste J, Germain E, Fernandez H (2000) Fertility following radical, conservative-surgical or medical treatment for tubal pregnancy: a population-based study. BJOG Int J Obstetr Gynaecol 107(6):714–721

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Krag Moeller LB, Moeller C, Thomsen SG, Andersen LF, Lundvall L, Lidegaard O, Kjer JJ, Ingemanssen JL, Zobbe V, Floridon C, Petersen J, Ottesen B (2009) Success and spontaneous pregnancy rates following systemic methotrexate versus laparoscopic surgery for tubal pregnancies: a randomized trial. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 88(12):1331–1337. doi:10.3109/00016340903188912

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Dubuisson JB, Aubriot FX, Foulot H, Bruel D, Bouquet de Joliniere J, Mandelbrot L (1990) Reproductive outcome after laparoscopic salpingectomy for tubal pregnancy. Fertil Steril 53(6):1004–1007

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Fernandez H, Marchal L, Vincent Y (1998) Fertility after radical surgery for tubal pregnancy. Fertil Steril 70(4):680–686

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Yalcinkaya T, Brown S, Mertz H, Thomas D (2000) A comparison of 25 mg/m2 vs 50 mg/m2 dose of methotrexate (MTX) for the treatment of ectopic pregnancy (EP). J Soc Gynecol Investig 7:179A

    Google Scholar 

  32. Sagiv R, Debby A, Feit H, Cohen-Sacher B, Keidar R, Golan A (2012) The optimal cutoff serum level of human chorionic gonadotropin for efficacy of methotrexate treatment in women with extrauterine pregnancy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 116(2):101–104. doi:10.1016/j.ijgo.2011.09.023

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study did not receive any specific grants from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sector.

Conflict of interest

There is no conflict of interest. We have had full control of all primary data and we agree to allow the Journal to review the data if requested.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Johannes Lermann.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lermann, J., Segl, P., Jud, S.M. et al. Low-dose methotrexate treatment in ectopic pregnancy: a retrospective analysis of 164 ectopic pregnancies treated between 2000 and 2008. Arch Gynecol Obstet 289, 329–335 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-013-2982-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-013-2982-x

Keywords

Navigation