Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A modified inexpensive transobturator vaginal tape inside-out procedure versus tension-free vaginal tape for the treatment of SUI: a prospective comparative study

  • General Gynecology
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To prospectively compare, in terms of efficacy and safety, the tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) and our modified transobturator vaginal tape inside-out (TVT-O) procedure with self-tailored monofilament macroporous polypropylene mesh for stress urinary incontinence (SUI).

Methods

A total of 150 women with SUI were assigned to modified TVT-O (n = 95) and TVT (n = 55), respectively, the surgical outcomes compared 1 year later. A cough stress test was applied to the objective outcomes, while urinary incontinence specific quality of life (IQoL) questionnaire, to the subjective outcomes.

Results

The objective success rates defined as a negative stress test were found to be 95% in the TVT group and 96% in the modified TVT-O group, respectively. No significant difference was found between these two groups in the cure, improvement and failure rates (all P > 0.05), with significant improvement in quality of life (QoL) and no significant difference in patient satisfaction rates in two groups. In the TVT group were found three cases of bladder injuries. In the modified TVT-O group, operative duration, blood loss and medical cost were significantly reduced compared with those in the TVT one (P < 0.01).

Conclusions

In the study, the modified TVT-O procedure could be defined to be quicker, more economic with fewer bladder complications than the TVT approach while both were found to be manually simple and clinically mini-invasive with similar efficacy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. de Leval J (2003) Novel surgical technique for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: transobturator vaginal tape inside-out. Eur Urol 44(6):724–730 pii: S0302283803004718

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Chen X, Li H, Fan B, Yang X, Tong X (2009) An inexpensive modified transobturator vaginal tape inside-out procedure for the surgical treatment of female stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 20(11):1365–1368. doi:10.1007/s00192-009-0961-3

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ulmsten U, Henriksson L, Johnson P, Varhos G (1996) An ambulatory surgical procedure under local anesthesia for treatment of female urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 7(2):81–85 discussion 85–86

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Karateke A, Haliloglu B, Cam C, Sakalli M (2009) Comparison of tvt and tvt-o in patients with stress urinary incontinence: Short-term cure rates and factors influencing the outcome. A prospective randomised study. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 49(1):99–105. doi:10.1111/j.1479-828X.2009.00957.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bushnell DM, Martin ML, Summers KH, Svihra J, Lionis C, Patrick DL (2005) Quality of life of women with urinary incontinence: cross-cultural performance of 15 language versions of the i-qol. Qual Life Res 14(8):1901–1913. doi:10.1007/s11136-005-5266-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lee KS, Choo MS, Lee YS, Han JY, Kim JY, Jung BJ, Han DH (2008) Prospective comparison of the ‘inside-out’ and ‘outside-in’ transobturator-tape procedures for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 19(4):577–582. doi:10.1007/s00192-007-0487-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Abrams P, Andersson KE, Brubaker L, Cardozo L, Cottenden A, Denis L, Donovan J, Fonda D, Fry C, Griffiths D, Hanno P, Herschorn S, Homma Y, Hu T, Hunskaar S, van Kerrebroeck P, Khoury S, Madoff R, Morrison J, Mostwin J, Newman D, Nijman R, Norton C, Payne C, Richard F, Smith A, Staskin D, Thuroff J, Tubaro A, Vodusek DB, Wall L, Wein A, Wilson D, Wyndaele JJ (2005) 3rd international consultation on incontinence recommendations of the international scientific committee: Evaluation and treatment of urinary incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse and faecal incontinence. Incontinence, vols 1 and 2:1589

  8. Ward K, Hilton P (2002) Prospective multicentre randomised trial of tension-free vaginal tape and colposuspension as primary treatment for stress incontinence. BMJ 325(7355):67

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Liapis A, Bakas P, Creatsas G (2002) Burch colposuspension and tension-free vaginal tape in the management of stress urinary incontinence in women. Eur Urol 41(4):469–473 pii: S0302283802000337

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Mellier G, Benayed B, Bretones S, Pasquier JC (2004) Suburethral tape via the obturator route: Is the tot a simplification of the tvt? Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 15(4):227–232

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Sivanesan K, Sathiyathasan S, Ghani R (2009) Transobturator tension free vaginal tapes and bladder injury. Arch Gynecol Obstet 279(1):5–7. doi:10.1007/s00404-008-0653-0

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Zullo MA, Plotti F, Calcagno M, Marullo E, Palaia I, Bellati F, Basile S, Muzii L, Angioli R, Panici PB (2007) One-year follow-up of tension-free vaginal tape (tvt) and trans-obturator suburethral tape from inside to outside (tvt-o) for surgical treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: a prospective randomised trial. Eur Urol 51(5):1376–1382. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2006.10.066 discussion 1383–1374

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Rinne K, Laurikainen E, Kivela A, Aukee P, Takala T, Valpas A, Nilsson CG (2008) A randomized trial comparing tvt with tvt-o: 12-month results. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 19(8):1049–1054. doi:10.1007/s00192-008-0581-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Liapis A, Bakas P, Giner M, Creatsas G (2006) Tension-free vaginal tape versus tension-free vaginal tape obturator in women with stress urinary incontinence. Gynecol Obstet Invest 62(3):160–164. doi:10.1159/000093320

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Dietz HP, Barry C, Lim Y, Rane A (2006) Tvt vs monarc: a comparative study. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 17(6):566–569. doi:10.1007/s00192-006-0065-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Boustead GB (2002) The tension-free vaginal tape for treating female stress urinary incontinence. BJU Int 89(7):687–693 pii: 2659

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Meschia M, Bertozzi R, Pifarotti P, Baccichet R, Bernasconi F, Guercio E, Magatti F, Minini G (2007) Peri-operative morbidity and early results of a randomised trial comparing tvt and tvt-o. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 18(11):1257–1261. doi:10.1007/s00192-007-0334-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Araco F, Gravante G, Sorge R, Overton J, De Vita D, Sesti F, Piccione E (2008) Tvt-o vs tvt: A randomized trial in patients with different degrees of urinary stress incontinence. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 19(7):917–926. doi:10.1007/s00192-007-0554-y

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 30471815). The authors wish to express appreciation to Yongfeng Zhao, Junhua Liang, Xia Jin, and Lei Chu for their efforts in data collection and statistical help; to Bozhen Fan, Li Li, and Jianjun Wang for their constant technical support.

Conflict of interest

We here state that we have no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiang Yang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chen, X., Tong, X., Jiang, M. et al. A modified inexpensive transobturator vaginal tape inside-out procedure versus tension-free vaginal tape for the treatment of SUI: a prospective comparative study. Arch Gynecol Obstet 284, 1461–1466 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-011-1871-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-011-1871-4

Keywords

Navigation