Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Beneficial effects of dienogest on uterine myoma volume: a retrospective controlled study comparing with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist

  • General Gynecology
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Uterine leiomyomas are the most common benign tumors of reproductive age women, but there is no effective medical therapy to data. Aim of this study was to examine and compare the efficacy of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) versus dienogest in premenopausal women with uterine myoma.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of 55 premenopausal patients with endometriosis, who received dienogest (2 mg daily) for 6 months regarding coexistence of uterine myoma between January 2008 and June 2010. To compare these data in a case–control study, we analyzed a matched control group of 12 patients treated with leuprolide acetate (1.88 mg monthly) for 6 months having uterine myoma.

Results

Of the 55 patients treated with dienogest, six were associated with coexistent myoma node. Total myoma volume significantly decreased to 59.7 ± 7.0% of initial in dienogest group and 51.9 ± 5.5% in GnRHa group. Reduction rate in myoma volume was similar in both groups.

Conclusion

Uterine myoma volume was successfully reduced by use of dienogest. Consideration of GnRHa disadvantages may lead to short- or long-term management of women with myoma who are to be managed transiently, and who wish to avoid surgical intervention, especially perimenopausal women.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Levy B (2008) Modern management of uterine fibroids. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 87:812–823

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Parker W (2007) Uterine myomas: management. Fertil Steril 88:255–271

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sankaran S, Manyonda I (2008) Medical management of fibroids. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 22:655–676

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Schweppe K (1999) Progestins and uterine leiomyoma. Gynecol Endocrinol 13(Suppl 4):21–24

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sasagawa S, Shimizu Y, Kami H et al (2008) Dienogest is a selective progesterone receptor agonist in transactivation analysis with potent oral endometrial activity due to its efficient pharmacokinetic profile. Steroids 73:222–231

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Sitruk-Ware R (2006) New progestagens for contraceptive use. Hum Reprod Update 12:169–178

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Harada T, Taniguchi F (2010) Dienogest: a new therapeutic agent for the treatment of endometriosis. Womens Health 6:27–35

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Harada T, Momoeda M, Taketani Y et al (2009) Dienogest is as effective as intranasal buserelin acetate for the relief of pain symptoms associated with endometriosis–a randomized, double-blind, multicenter, controlled trial. Fertil Steril 91:675–681

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Köhler G, Faustmann T, Gerlinger C, Seitz C, Mueck A (2010) A dose-ranging study to determine the efficacy and safety of 1, 2, and 4 mg of dienogest daily for endometriosis. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 108:21–25

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Schindler A, Christensen B, Henkel A, Oettel M, Moore C (2006) High-dose pilot study with the novel progestogen dienogestin patients with endometriosis. Gynecol Endocrinol 22:9–17

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Strowitzki T, Marr J, Gerlinger C, Faustmann T, Seitz C (2010) Dienogest is as effective as leuprolide acetate in treating the painful symptoms of endometriosis: a 24-week, randomized, multicentre, open-label trial. Hum Reprod Update 25:633–641

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Strowitzki T, Faustmann T, Gerlinger C, Seitz C (2010) Dienogest in the treatment of endometriosis-associated pelvic pain: a 12-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 151:193–198

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Huang J, Lathi R, Lemyre M, Rodriguez H, Nezhat C, Nezhat C (2010) Coexistence of endometriosis in women with symptomatic leiomyomas. Fertil Steril 94:720–723

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Parsanezhad M, Azmoon M, Alborzi S et al (2010) A randomized, controlled clinical trial comparing the effects of aromatase inhibitor (letrozole) and gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (triptorelin) on uterine leiomyoma volume and hormonal status. Fertil Steril 93:192–198

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Endrikat J, Graeser T, Mellinger U, Ertan K, Holz C (2007) A multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to investigate the efficacy of a continuous-combined hormone therapy preparation containing 1 mg estradiol valerate/2 mg dienogest on hot flushes in postmenopausal women. Maturitas 58:201

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Momoeda M, Harada T, Terakawa N et al (2009) Long-term use of dienogest for the treatment of endometriosis. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 35:1069–1076

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Schindler A, Henkel A, Moore C, Oettel M (2010) Effect and safety of high-dose dienogest (20 mg/day) in the treatment of women with endometriosis. Arch Gynecol Obstet doi:10.1007/s00404-009-1301-z

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Atsushi Imai.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ichigo, S., Takagi, H., Matsunami, K. et al. Beneficial effects of dienogest on uterine myoma volume: a retrospective controlled study comparing with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist. Arch Gynecol Obstet 284, 667–670 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-010-1732-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-010-1732-6

Keywords

Navigation