Abstract
Purpose
To evaluate the risk factors of unsuccessful fitting of ring pessary in pelvic organ prolapse (POP), continuation rate, and adverse events.
Methods
The ring pessary was offered to 100 symptomatic POP patients. POP was staged according to Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) system. A successful fitting was defined as when patients continued pessary use for more than 2 weeks. Adverse events were evaluated in patients who had a successful fitting.
Results
Most patients (71%) were in POP-Q stage III–IV and 77 patients were fitted at the initial visit. Successful fitting was reported in 62 patients (62%). However, 52 patients (52%) continued to use the pessary at 13 months median follow-up. The most common reason for discontinuation was frequent pessary expulsion. Short vaginal length ≤6 cm and wide introitus >4 fingerbreadths were the significant risk factors for unsuccessful fitting. New onset of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) developed in 28.2% of patients. One third and 21% of patients had vaginal discharge and vaginal erosion, respectively. Only half of the patients could manage the pessary either by themselves or with their caregivers.
Conclusion
The ring pessary fitting can be attempted in all POP cases irrespective of stage. Short vaginal length <6 cm and wide introitus >4 fingerbreadths were the risk factors for unsuccessful fitting. It has an acceptable continuation rate and manageable adverse events. The self-care of pessary is an important strategy to minimize adverse events.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Swift SE (2000) The distribution of pelvic organ support in a population of female subjects seen for routine gynecologic health care. Am J Obstet Gynecol 183:277–285
Olsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO, Colling JC, Clark AL (1997) Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 89:501–506
Pott-Grinstein E, Newcomer JR (2001) Gynecologists’ patterns of prescribing pessaries. J Reprod Med 46:205–208
Weber AM, Richter HE (2005) Pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 106:615–634
Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bo K, Brubaker LP, De Lancey JO, Klarskov P, Shull BL, Smith AR (1996) The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175:10–17
Clemons JL, Aguilar VC, Tillinghast TA, Jackson ND, Myers DL (2004) Risk factors associated with an unsuccessful pessary fitting trial in women with pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 190:345–350
Fernando RJ, Thakar R, Sultan AH, Shah SM, Jones PW (2006) Effect of vaginal pessaries on symptoms associated with pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 108:93–99
Mutone MF, Terry C, Hale DS, Benson JT (2005) Factors which influence the short-term success of pessary management of pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 193:89–94
Wu V, Farrell SA, Baskett TF, Flowerdew G (1997) A simplified protocol for pessary management. Obstet Gynecol 90:990–994
Handa VL, Jones M (2002) Do pessaries prevent the progression of pelvic organ prolapse? Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 13:349–351
Sulak PJ, Kuehl TJ, Shull BL (1993) Vaginal pessaries and their use in pelvic relaxation. J Reprod Med 38:919–923
Clemons JL, Aguilar VC, Sokol ER, Jackson ND, Myers DL (2004) Patient characteristics that are associated with continued pessary use versus surgery after 1 year. Am J Obstet Gynecol 191:159–164
Brincat C, Kenton K, Pat Fitzgerald M, Brubaker L (2004) Sexual activity predicts continued pessary use. Am J Obstet Gynecol 191:198–200
Sarma S, Ying T, Moore KH (2009) Long-term vaginal ring pessary use: discontinuation rates and adverse events. BJOG 116:1715–1721
Mokrzycki ML, Hatangadi SB, Zaccardi JE, Cox S (2001) Preexisting stress urinary incontinence: a predictor of discontinuation with pessary management. J Low Genit Tract Dis 5:204–207
Viera AJ, Larkins-Pettigrew M (2000) Practical use of the pessary. Am Fam Physician 61:2719–2726
Jelovsek JE, Maher C, Barber MD (2007) Pelvic organ prolapse. Lancet 369:1027–1038
Powers K, Lazarou G, Wang A, La Combe J, Bensinger G, Greston WM, Mikhail MS (2006) Pessary use in advanced pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J 17:160–164
Conflict of interest
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Manchana, T. Ring pessary for all pelvic organ prolapse. Arch Gynecol Obstet 284, 391–395 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-010-1675-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-010-1675-y