Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Non-barrier agents for postoperative adhesion prevention: clinical and preclinical aspects

  • General Gynecology
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this document is to review the non-barrier methods to prevent postoperative adhesion formation in humans.

Methods

A MEDLINE computer search was performed to identify relevant articles using the keywords “postoperative adhesion prevention” “abdominal” and “humans”. Subsequent searches were performed using the keyword “non-barrier” to further supplement the information obtained. After careful review of the abstracts, 15 articles were selected for inclusion in the manuscript.

Results

Many methods, drugs and materials have been demonstrated effective for reducing postoperative adhesion in animal models. Among them, four types of drugs have been clinically used in attempts to reduce postoperative adhesions: gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists, anti-inflammatory drugs, humidified CO2 and hydroflotation. Many clinical and meta-analyses revealed that hydroflotation materials do not increase adhesion-free outcome. GnRHa pretreatment using a standard clinical dose (3.75 mg monthly) before myomectomy do not decrease adhesion formation. The role of CO2 on the reduction and/or prevention of postoperative adhesions have been reported only in cardiac surgery. None of them have been adopted for clinical standard therapy, despite positive reports in animals or preclinical applications.

Conclusion

In contrast to the results from animal studies, there is no substantial evidence that the use of non-barrier materials reduces postoperative abdominal adhesions in humans.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alpay Z, Saed G, Diamond M (2008) Postoperative adhesions: from formation to prevention. Semin Reprod Med 26:313–321

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. DeWilde R, Trew G (2007) Postoperative abdominal adhesions and their prevention in gynaecological surgery Expert consensus position. Gynecol Surg 4:161–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine; Society of Reproductive Surgeons (2007) Pathogenesis, consequences, and control of peritoneal adhesions in gynecologic surgery. Fertil Steril 88:21–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Rajab T, Wallwiener M, Talukdar S, Kraemer B (2009) Adhesion-related complications are common, but rarely discussed in preoperative consent: a multicenter study. World J Surg 33:748–750

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. diZerega G, Tulandi T (2008) Prevention of intra-abdominal adhesions in gynaecological surgery. Reprod Biomed Online 17:303–306

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. González-Quintero V, Cruz-Pachano F (2009) Preventing adhesions in obstetric and gynecologic surgical procedures. Rev Obstet Gynecol 2:38–45

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Imai A, Suzuki N (2010) Topical non-barrier agents for postoperative adhesion prevention in animal models. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 149:131–135

    Google Scholar 

  8. van der Wal J, Jeekel J (2007) The use of statins in postoperative adhesion prevention. Ann Surg 245:185–186

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. DeCherney A, diZerega G (1997) Clinical problem of intraperitoneal postsurgical adhesion formation following general surgery and the use of adhesion prevention barriers. Surg Clin North Am 77:671–688

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Holmdahl L, Risberg B, Beck D et al (1997) Adhesions: pathogenesis and prevention-panel discussion and summary. Eur J Surg Suppl 163:56–62

    Google Scholar 

  11. Shavell V, Saed G, Diamond M (2009) Review: Cellular metabolism: contribution to postoperative adhesion development. Reprod Sci 16:627–634

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Holmdahl L, Falkenberg M, Ivarsson M, Risberg B (1997) Plasminogen activators and inhibitors in peritoneal tissue. APMIS 105:25–30

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Scott-Coombes D, Whawell S, Vipond M, Thompson J (1995) Human intraperitoneal fibrinolytic response to elective surgery. Br J Surg 82:414–417

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. diZeregal G, Campeau J (2001) Peritoneal repair and post-surgical adhesion formation. Hum Reprod Update 7:547–555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Molinas C, Binda M, Koninckx P (2006) Angiogenic factors in peritoneal adhesion formation. Gynecol Surg 3:157–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Davey A, Mather P (2007) Surgical adhesions: a timely update, a great challenge for the future. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 14:15–22

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Wiseman D, Trout J, Diamond M (1998) The rates of adhesion development and the effects of crystalloid solutions on adhesion development in pelvic surgery. Fertil Steril 70:702–711

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Jansen R (1988) Failure of peritoneal irrigation with heparin during pelvic operations upon young women to reduce adhesions. Surg Gynecol Obstet 166:154–160

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Reid R, Hahn P, Spence J, Tulandi T, Yuzpe A, Wiseman D (1997) A randomized clinical trial of oxidized regenerated cellulose adhesion barrier (Interceed, TC7) alone or in combination with heparin. Fertil Steril 67:23–29

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Shear L, Swartz C, Shinaberger JA, Barry KG (1965) Kinetics of peritoneal fluid absorption in adult man. N Engl J Med 272:123–127

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Metwally M, Watson A, Lilford R, Vandekerckhove P (2006) Fluid and pharmacological agents for adhesion prevention after gynaecological surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 19:CD001298

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hosie K, Gilbert J, Kerr D, Brown C, Peers E (2001) Fluid dynamics in man of an intraperitoneal drug delivery solution: 4% icodextrin. Drug Deliv 8:9–12

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Menzies D, Pascual M, Walz M et al (2006) Use of icodextrin 4% solution in the prevention of adhesion formation following general surgery: from the multicentre ARIEL Registry. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 88:375–382

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Brown C, Luciano A, Martin D, Peers E, Scrimgeour A, diZerega G (2007) Adept (icodextrin 4% solution) reduces adhesions after laparoscopic surgery for adhesiolysis: a double-blind, randomized, controlled study. Fertil Steril 88:1413–1426

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. diZerega G, Verco S, Young P et al (2002) A randomized, controlled pilot study of the safety and efficacy of 4% icodextrin solution in the reduction of adhesions following laparoscopic gynaecological surgery. Hum Reprod 17:1031–1038

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Bateman B, Nunley WJ, Kitchin Jr (1982) Prevention of postoperative peritoneal adhesions with ibuprofen. Fertil Steril 38:107–108

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. O’Brien W, Drake T, Bibro M (1982) The use of ibuprofen and dexamethasone in the prevention of postoperative adhesion formation. Obstet Gynecol 60:373–378

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Imai A, Tamaya T (2000) GnRH receptor and apoptotic signaling. Vitam Horm 59:1–33

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Lydia W, Cheung T, Wong A (2009) Gonadotropin-releasing hormone: GnRH receptor signaling in extrapituitary tissues. FEBS J 275:5479–5495

    Google Scholar 

  30. Schindler A (2004) Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists for prevention of postoperative adhesions: an overview. Gynecol Endocrinol 19:51–55

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Wright J, Sharpe-Timms K (1995) Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist therapy reduces postoperative adhesion formation and reformation after adhesiolysis in rat models for adhesion formation and endometriosis. Fertil Steril 63:1094–1100

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Sharpe-Timms K, Zimmer R, Jolliff W, Wright J, Nothnick W, Curry T (1998) Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) therapy alters activity of plasminogen activators, matrix metalloproteinases, and their inhibitors in rat models for adhesion formation and endometriosis: potential GnRH-a-regulated mechanisms reducing adhesion formation. Fertil Steril 69:916–923

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Wiczyk H, Grow D, Adams L, O’Shea D, Reece M (1998) Pelvic adhesions contain sex steroid receptors and produce angiogenesis growth factors. Fertil Steril 69:511–516

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Suzuki N, Yamamoto A, Furui T, Imai A (2010) GnRH receptor and peritoneal plasmin activity. Gynecol Endocrinol. doi:10.3109/09513591003686338

  35. Chegini N (2008) TGF-beta system: the principal profibrotic mediator of peritoneal adhesion formation. Semin Reprod Med 26:298–312

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Diamond M, El-Hammady E, Wang R, Saed G (2003) Regulation of transforming growth factor-beta, type III collagen, and fibronectin by dichloroacetic acid in human fibroblasts from normal peritoneum and adhesions. Fertil Steril 79:1161–1167

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Sugiyama M, Imai A, Takahashi S, Hirano S, Furui T, Tamaya T (2003) Advanced indications for gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogues in gynecological oncology. Int J Oncol 23:445–452

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Winkler U, Bühler K, Koslowski S, Oberhoff C, Schindler A (1992) Plasmatic haemostasis in gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogue therapy: effects of leuprorelin acetate depot on coagulatory and fibrinolytic activities. Clin Ther 14(Suppl A):114–120

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Coddington C, Grow D, Ahmed M, Toner J, Cook E, Diamond M (2009) Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist pretreatment did not decrease postoperative adhesion formation after abdominal myomectomy in a randomized control trial. Fertil Steril 91:1909–1913

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Persson M, van der Linden J (2009) Intraoperative field flooding with warm humidified CO2 may help to prevent adhesion formation after open surgery. Med Hypotheses 73:521–523

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Matsuzaki S, Canis M, Bazin J, Darcha C, Pouly J, Mage G (2007) Effects of supplemental perioperative oxygen on post-operative abdominal wound adhesions in a mouse laparotomy model with controlled respiratory support. Hum Reprod 22:2702–2706

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Svenarud P, Persson M, van der Linden J (2004) Effect of CO2 insufflation on the number and behavior of air microemboli in open-heart surgery: a randomized clinical trial. Circulation 109:1127–1132

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Levrant S, Bieber E, Barnes R (1997) Anterior abdominal wall adhesions after laparotomy or laparoscopy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 4:353–356

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Menzies D (1992) Peritoneal adhesions. Incidence, cause, and prevention. Surg Annu 24:27–45

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Tulandi T, Al-Jaroudi D (2003) Nonclosure of peritoneum: a reappraisal. Am J Obstet Gynecol 189:609–612

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Cheong Y, Bajekal N, Li T (2001) Peritoneal closure-to close or not to close. Hum Reprod 16:1548–1552

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Cheong Y, Premkumar G, Metwally M, Peacock J, Li T (2009) To close or not to close? A systematic review and a meta-analysis of peritoneal non-closure and adhesion formation after caesarean section. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 147:3–8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Lyell D, Caughey A, Hu E, Daniels K (2005) Peritoneal closure at primary cesarean delivery and adhesions. Obstet Gynecol 106:275–280

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Al-Sunaidi M, Tulandi T (2006) Adhesion-related bowel obstruction after hysterectomy for benign conditions. Obstet Gynecol 108:1162–1166

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest statement

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Endocrine-Related Cancer, Matsunami General Hospital, Kasamatsu, Gifu, 501-6062, Japan

    Atsushi Imai

  2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Matsunami General Hospital, Kasamatsu, Gifu, 501-6062, Japan

    Hiroshi Takagi & Kazutoshi Matsunami

  3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gifu University School of Medicine, Yanagido, Gifu, 501-1194, Japan

    Noriko Suzuki

Authors
  1. Atsushi Imai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hiroshi Takagi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kazutoshi Matsunami
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Noriko Suzuki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Atsushi Imai.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Imai, A., Takagi, H., Matsunami, K. et al. Non-barrier agents for postoperative adhesion prevention: clinical and preclinical aspects. Arch Gynecol Obstet 282, 269–275 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-010-1423-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-010-1423-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation