Skip to main content
Log in

The era of centers: the influence of establishing specialized centers on patients’ choice of hospital

  • General Gynecology
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

It is considered that establishing accredited specialized centers can serve as a marketing tool. This study investigated whether accredited specialized centers influence patients’ choice of hospital.

Methods

A total of 2,389 patients was included in a questionnaire survey: 468 at the Department of Gynecology, 745 at the certified University Breast Center of Franconia, 1,000 at the University Perinatal Center of Franconia and 176 for whom classification details were lacking.

Results

Among the oncological patients, physicians in private practice played an important role in the choice of hospital (58.4 vs. 25.7%; P < 0.001; OR 4.058). Among obstetric patients, the primary factors were recommendations from family [odds ratio (OR) 0.495], friends (OR 0.218), and previous personal experience of the hospital (OR 0.695). For oncological patients, treatment quality (OR 2.693), availability of a center (OR 1.785), and certification (OR 3.939) were comparatively more important. For obstetric patients, friendliness (OR 0.409) and attractive accommodation (OR 0.153) were more important.

Conclusions

Physicians are the most important source of recommendations for oncological patients. From the marketing point of view, intensive involvement of local private-practice physicians is necessary. The availability of certified perinatal centers does not currently play any part in patients’ choice of hospital.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Blamey RW, EUSOMA (2000) The requirements of a specialist breast unit. Eur J Cancer 36:2288–2293

  2. Blamey RW, Cataliotti L (2006) EUSOMA: the requirements of a specialist breast unit [revised version]. In: Perry N (ed) European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening and diagnosis, 4th edn. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg, pp 343–54

  3. Bamberg M (2006) Konzeption für neue Versorgungsstrukturen in der Onkologie. Forum DKG 7:34–36

    Google Scholar 

  4. Beckmann MW, Adler G, Albers P, Bruns J, Ehninger G, Hausschild A, Neuhaus P, Schmiegel W, Schmitz S, Schmoll HJ, Weller M, Wiegel T, Bamberg M (2007) Onkologie: Dreistufenmodell optimiert Behandlung unter Kostendeckung. Wie die künftigen Strukturen der onkologischen Versorgung in Deutschland aussehen sollten. Dtsch Ärztebl 104(44):A3004–A3009

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gemeinsamer Bundesausschuss (2005) Vereinbarung über Massnahmen zur Qualitätssicherung der Versorgung von Früh- und Neugeborenen. Bekanntmachung der Vereinbarung gemäss § 91 Abs. 7. SGB V, 20. Siegburg, Germany: Gemeinsamer Bundesauschuss

  6. Hillner BE, Smith TJ, Desch CE (2000) Hospital and physician volume or specialization and outcomes in cancer treatment: importance in quality of cancer care. J Clin Oncol 18:2327–2340

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wagner S, Ganslandt T, Keiling CM, Jap D, Fasching PA, Lux MP, Beckmann MW (2007) Ist ein Brustzentrum finanzierbar?—Ein Kalkulationsmodell für das Universitäts-Brustzentrum Franken (UBF). Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 9:966–973

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Beckmann MW, Fasching PA, Lux MP, Bani MR, Schulz-Wendtland R, Ott O, Strnad V, Papadopoulos T, Helm G, Bach A, Rauch A, Marsch M, Wagner S (2007/2008) Brustzentrum: Zertifizierung, Qualität und Ökonomie. Klin Onkol 5:18–23

  9. Teichmann T (2007) Quo usque tandem … oder: Wie gewiss macht ein Zertifikat? Frauenarzt 48:318–320

    Google Scholar 

  10. Blum K, Offermanns M (2006) Auswirkungen der DMP Brustkrebs auf die Krankenhäuser—Studie des Deutschen Krankenhausinstituts (DKI) im Auftrag der Deutschen Krankenhausgesellschaft (DKG). Düsseldorf: Deutsches Krankenhausinstitut/Universität Düsseldorf. http://dki.comnetinfo.de/index.php?tm=0&bm=6&lm=1

  11. Blum K, Offermanns M (2006) DMP Brustkrebs: Krankenhäuser sehen wenig Positives. Dtsch Ärztebl 103(41):A2678–A2680

    Google Scholar 

  12. Riegl & Partner (1996) Ideale zukunftssichere Geburtsklinik. Wöchnerinnen sehen—Geburtskliniken—sehen Wöchnerinnen. Die grosse Klinikuntersuchung durch über 17.000 Befragungen. Riegl & Partner, Augsburg

  13. Riegl GF (2000) Krankenhausmarketing und Qualitäts-Management. In: Riegl GF (ed) Grosses Handbuch für das Erfolgs-Management in Hospitälern, 2nd edn. Riegl, Augsburg, pp 17–71

Download references

Conflict of interest statement

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Patrick Lux.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lux, M.P., Fasching, P.A., Schrauder, M. et al. The era of centers: the influence of establishing specialized centers on patients’ choice of hospital. Arch Gynecol Obstet 283, 559–568 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-010-1398-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-010-1398-0

Keywords

Navigation