Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Fetal distress evaluation using and analyzing the variables of antepartum computerized cardiotocography

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

In this study, we tried to establish cut-off values for more than one parameters of computerized cardiotocography (c CTG) in the prediction of fetal distress during labor, using a group of pregnant women with low-risk pregnancies.

Method

A retrospective study was performed. Data were collected from 167 patients for measurements of fetal heart rate (FHR) variables and perinatal outcome. Computerized CTG was performed with an Oxford Sonicaid monitor with connection to a 8000 system for CTG spontaneous analysis. The following c CTG variables were considered: FHR, number of accelerations, the presence and the number of episodes of high and low variation, the number of decelerations, short-term variation (STV), peaks of contractions (per hour) and fetal movements assessed by maternal perception (per hour). Computerized CTG recordings started not earlier than the beginning of week 38 of gestation. Immediately after delivery, blood sample was collected from umbilical artery for umbilical artery blood gas analysis (UBGA). The main UBGA parameter in cord umbilical artery that was considered for analysis was pH. pH values <7.25 were considered as suspicious for acidemia and pH values ≥7.25 as normal.

Results

Women suspicious for fetal distress during labor presented significantly lower fetal movements (P = 0.026), accelerations (P = 0.018), variability (P < 0.001), number of high episodes (P < 0.001), higher values of FHR baseline (P < 0.001) and low episodes (P < 0.001). Only the number of decelerations did not differ significantly between the two groups (P = 0.545). The cut-off points of 5.00 for STV and 3.00 for high episodes were determined to classify women with fetal distress, which yielded high sensitivities (34 and 52%) and specificities (96.6 and 94.9%), with positive predictive values of 81.0 and 81.3% and negative predictive values of 77.4 and 82.2%, respectively.

Conclusions

In conclusion, we believe that not only STV but also other components of the cCTG, mainly the presence and the number of episodes of high variation, are related to pregnancy’s outcome as measured by an umbilical artery pH.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Salamalekis E, Siristatidis C, Vasios G et al (2006) Fetal pulse oximetry and wavelet analysis of the fetal heart rate in the evaluation of abnormal cardiotocography tracings. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 32:135–139. doi:10.1111/j.1447-0756.2006.00377.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ferrario M, Signorini M, Magenes G et al (2006) Comparison of entropy-based regularity estimators: application to the Fetal Heart Rate Signal for the identification of fetal distress. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 53:119–125. doi:10.1109/TBME.2005.859809

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ayres de Campos D, Costa-Santos C, Bernardes J et al (2005) Prediction of neonatal state computer analysis of fetal heart rate tracings: the antepartum arm of the SisPorto multicentre validation study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 118:52–60. doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2004.04.013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Farmakides G, Weiner Z (1995) Computerized analysis of the fetal heart rate. Clin Obstet Gynecol 38:112–120. doi:10.1097/00003081-199503000-00012

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Dawes GS, Moulden M, Redman CW (1996) Improvements in computerized fetal heart rate analysis antepartum. J Perinat Med 24:25–36

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Todros T, Preve CU, Plazzotta C, Biolcati M, Lombardo P (1996) Fetal heart rate tracings: observers versus computer assessment. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 68:83–86. doi:10.1016/0301-2115(96)02487-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Valensise H, Facchinetti F, Vasapollo B, Giannini F, Monte ID, Arduini D (2006) The computerized fetal heart rate analysis in post-term pregnancy identifies patients at risk for fetal distress in labour. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 125:185–192. doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2005.06.034

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Buscicchio G, Giannubilo SR, Bezzeccheri V, Scagnoli C, Rinci A, Tranquilli AL (2006) Computerized analysis of the fetal heart rate in pregnancies complicated by preterm premature rupture of membranes (pPROM). J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 19:39–42. doi:10.1080/14767050500361505

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Boog G (2004) Intrapartum computerized fetal heart rate parameters and metabolic acidosis at birth. Obstet Gynecol 103:1002–1003

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Garcia GS, Mariani NC, Araujo JE, Garcia RL, Nardozza LM, Moron AF (2008) Fetal acidemia prediction through short-term variation assessed by antepartum computerized cardiotocography in pregnant women with hypertension syndrome. Arch Gynecol Obstet 278:125–128. doi:10.1007/s00404-007-0537-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Valensise H, Arduini D, Giannini F, Conforti R, Giacomello F, Romanini C (1997) Role of antepartum computerized fetal heart rate analysis in the prediction of fetal distress during labor. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 73:129–134. doi:10.1016/S0301-2115(97)02740-1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Weiner Z, Farmakides G, Schulman H, Kellner L, Plancher S, Maulik D (1994) Computerized analysis of fetal heart rate variation in postterm pregnancy: prediction of intrapartum fetal distress and fetal acidosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 171:1132–1138

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Zimmer EZ, Paz Y, Goldstick O, Beloosesky R, Weiner Z (2000) Computerized analysis of fetal heart rate after maternal glucose ingestion in normal pregnancy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 93:57–60. doi:10.1016/S0301-2115(00)00255-4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Anceschi MM, Piazze JJ, Vozzi G, Ruozi BA, Figliolini C, Vigna R, Cosmi EV (1999) Antepartum computerized CTG and neonatal acid-base status at birth. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 65:267–272. doi:10.1016/S0020-7292(99)00055-7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bernardes J, Ayres-de-Campos D, Costa-Pereira A, Pereira-Leite L, Garrido A (1998) Objective computerized fetal heart rate analysis. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 62:141–147. doi:10.1016/S0020-7292(98)00079-4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Guzman ER, Vintzileos AM, Martins M, Benito C, Houlihan C, Hanley M (1996) The efficacy of individual computer heart rate indices in detecting acidemia at birth in growth-restricted fetuses. Obstet Gynecol 87:969–974. doi:10.1016/0029-7844(96)00020-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Nielsen PV, Stigsby B, Nickelsen C, Nim J (1987) Intra- and inter-observer variability in the assessment of intrapartum cardiotocograms. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 66:421–424. doi:10.3109/00016348709022046

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Chung DY, Sim YB, Park KT, Yi SH, Shin JC, Kim SP (2001) Spectral analysis of fetal heart rate variability as a predictor of intrapartum fetal distress. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 73:109–116. doi:10.1016/S0020-7292(01)00348-4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest statement

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Medical School, Demokritus University of Thrace, Str. Sarafi 3, 68100, Alexandroupolis, Greece

    Georgios Galazios, Grigorios Tripsianis, Panagiotis Tsikouras, Nikoleta Koutlaki & Vasilios Liberis

Authors
  1. Georgios Galazios
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Grigorios Tripsianis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Panagiotis Tsikouras
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Nikoleta Koutlaki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Vasilios Liberis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Georgios Galazios.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Galazios, G., Tripsianis, G., Tsikouras, P. et al. Fetal distress evaluation using and analyzing the variables of antepartum computerized cardiotocography. Arch Gynecol Obstet 281, 229–233 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-009-1119-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-009-1119-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation