Abstract
Objective
To evaluate the rate and characteristics of postoperative intrauterine adhesions (IUA) that might be formed following hysteroscopic reproductive surgery from both a gross and a histologic perspective as determined by early and late follow-up diagnostic hysteroscopy.
Methods
Retrospective analysis of 61 women wishing a pregnancy and suffering from a significant intrauterine pathology affecting their reproductive outcome were reviewed. All patients were treated hysteroscopically. Subsequently, they were randomly assigned to perform a follow-up diagnostic hysteroscopy at a variable intervals from their initial surgery. Multiple hysteroscopic-guided biopsies from IUA, when present, were obtained in several cases. Twenty patients were in the early group and had follow-up hysteroscopy performed 2–4 weeks after the initial operation. The late diagnostic group consisted of 41 patients with follow-up hysteroscopy at about 12 months (8–16 months). The two groups were similar to composition. Postoperatively, none of the early diagnostic group underwent hysterosalpingography (HSG) whereas all of the late group performed HSG 4 months following the initial surgery, which showed at least one-third of the cavity free of adhesions. When adhesions were present, no effort was made to lyse them.
Results
At follow-up hysteroscopy, 25% of both groups had no significant adhesions. Grade I adhesions (thin, filmy) occurred in 60% of the early hysteroscopy patients and in only 12% of the late group (P < 0.05). Grade II adhesions were present in 10% of the early group and in up to 41% in the late group (P < 0.05), whereas Grade III adhesions were present in only 5% of the early hysteroscopy group, but in 22% of the late one (P < 0.05). Correlation between hysteroscopic and histologic findings were good in most of cases in both groups. Follow-up to determine the subsequent reproductive outcome revealed similar conception rates in both groups.
Conclusion
The IUA that might be formed immediately following hysteroscopic reproductive surgery are histologically different from those appearing a longer time after the original operation. Routine early follow-up hysteroscopy can influence the prognosis resulting from the original surgery.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Change history
07 August 2023
An Editorial Expression of Concern to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-023-07160-z
References
Bakour SH, Jones SE, O’Donovan P (2006) Ambulatory hysteroscopy: evidence-based guide to diagnosis and therapy. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynecol 20:953–975
Ventolini G, Zhang M, Gruber J (2004) Hysteroscopy in the evaluation of patients with recurrent pregnancy loss: a cohort study in a primary care population. Surg Endosc 18:1782–1784
Fedele L, Bianchi S, Frontino G (2006) Septums and synechiae: approaches to surgical correction. Clin Obstet Gynecol 49:767–788
Amer MI, Abd-EL-Maeboud KH (2006) Amnion graft following hysteroscopic lysis of intrauterine adhesions. J Obstet Gynecol Res 32:559–566
Wamsteker K, de Kruif J (1993) Transcervical hysteroscopic resection of submucous fibroids for abnormal uterine bleeding: results regarding the degree of intramural extension. Obstet Gynecol 82:736–740
The American Fertility Society (1988) The American Fertility Society Classifcation of adnexal adhesions, distal tubal occlusion, tubal occlusion secondary to tubal ligation, tubal pregnancies, Mullerian anomalies and intrauterine adhesions. Fertil Steril 49:944–955
Hamou J (1991) Uterine adhesions. In: Hamou JE, Patrick JT, John JS (eds) Hysteroscopy and microhysteroscopy: text and atlas, Appleton & Lange, New York, pp 139–150
Barranger E, Gervaise A, Doumerc S, Fernandez H (2002) Reproductive performance after hysteroscopic metroplasty in the hypoplastic uterus: a study of 29 cases. BJOG 109:1331–1334
Vercelini P, Fedele L, Arcaini L, Rognoni MT, Candiani GB (1989) Value of intrauterine device insertion and estrogen administration after hysteroscopic metroplasty. J Reprod Med 34:447–450
Dabirashrafi H, Mohammad K, Moghadami-Tabrizi N, Zandine-jad K, Moghadami-Tabrizi M (1996) Is estrogen necessary after hysteroscopic incision of the uterine septum?. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 3:623–625
Bradley JM, Michael LB, Montz FJ (1994) Adhesions after extensive gynecologic surgery: clinical significance, etiology, and prevention. Am J Obstet Gynecol 170:1396–1403
Chapman R, Chapman K (1996) The value of two stage laser treatment for severe Asherman’s syndrome. Br J Obstet Gynecol 103:1256–1258
Sugimoto O (1978) Diagnostic and therapeutic hysteroscopy for traumatic intrauterine adhesions. Am J Obstet Gynecol 131:539–547
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shokeir, T.A., Fawzy, M. & Tatongy, M. The nature of intrauterine adhesions following reproductive hysteroscopic surgery as determined by early and late follow-up hysteroscopy: clinical implications. Arch Gynecol Obstet 277, 423–427 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-007-0475-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-007-0475-5