Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of oocyte quality and intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcome in women with isolated polycystic ovaries or polycystic ovarian syndrome

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To compare the oocyte quality and intracytoplasmic sperm injection performance in women with isolated polycystic ovaries or polycystic ovarian syndrome.

Design

Retrospective study.

Setting

Fertility unit.

Population

Three study groups were identified: women with PCO-only morphology (50 cycles), PCOS (51 cycles) and age matched control group (104 cycles) with isolated male factor infertility necessitating ICSI.

Method

Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and ICSI.

Main outcome measures

Response to gonadotropin stimulation, oocyte and embryo quality, clinical pregnancy rate and pregnancy outcome.

Results

Despite a significantly lower total gonadotropin dose, a significantly higher serum E2 level was attained in both the PCOS and the PCO-only groups compared to the control group. Although significantly more oocytes were retrieved in the PCOS and PCO-only groups, the number of 2-pronuclear embryos was similar to controls. No significant differences were noted in the maturity of the oocytes, oocyte dysmorphism, embryo quality, implantation and pregnancy rates among the three groups. However the clinical miscarriage rate was significantly lower in women with PCO-only morphology group (15.4 versus 31%, P < 0.05) than in the PCOS group.

Conclusion

Women with PCO-only appearance have shown to have similar characteristics to women with PCOS in terms of ovarian response to hMG stimulation, oocyte and embryo quality and pregnancy rates. However miscarriage rates were significantly lower in the PCO-only group than the PCOS group. Our findings suggest that factors unrelated to oocyte and embryo morphology present in PCOS patients may be instrumental in adverse reproductive outcomes in these women.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jacobs HS (1987) Polycystic ovaries and polycystic ovary syndrome. Gynecol Endocrinol 1:113–131

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Franks S (1995) Polycystic ovary syndrome. N Eng J Med 333:853–861

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Engmann L, Maconochie N, Sladkevicius P, Bekir J, Campbell S, Tan SL (1999) The outcome of in-vitro fertilization treatment in women with sonographic evidence of polycystic ovarian morphology. Hum Reprod 14:167–71

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ludwig M, Finas DF, al-Hasani S, Diedrich K, Ortmann O (1999) Oocyte quality and treatment outcome in intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles of polycystic ovarian syndrome patients. Hum Reprod 14:354–358

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Mulders AG, Laven JS, Imani B, Eijkemans MJ, Fauser BC (2003) IVF outcome in anovulatory infertility (WHO group 2)—including polycystic ovary syndrome—following previous unsuccessful ovulation induction. Reprod Biomed Online 7:50–58

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Heijnen EM, Ejjkemans MJ, Hughes EG, Laven JS, Macklon NS, Fauser BC (2006) A meta-analysis of outcomes of conventional IVF in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Hum Reprod 12:13–21

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. The Rotterdam ESHRE/ASRM-Sponsored PCOS consensus workshop group (2004) Revised 2003 consensus on diagnostic criteria and long-term health risks related to polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Hum Reprod 19:41–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Balen AH, Laven JS, Tan SL, Dewailly D (2003) Ultrasound assessment of the polycystic ovary: international consensus definitions. Hum Reprod Update 9:505–514

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Muttukrishna S, McGarrigle H, Wakim R, Khadum I, Ranieri DM, Serhal P (2005) Antral follicle count, anti-mullerian hormone and inhibin B: predictors of ovarian response in assisted reproductive technology? BJOG 112:1384–1390

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Van Steirteghem AC, Nagy Z, Joris H (1993) High fertilization and implantation rate after ICSI. Hum Reprod 8:1061–1066

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Desai NN, Goldstein J, Rowland DY, Goldfarb JM (2000) Morphological evaluation of human embryos and derivation of an embryo quality scoring system specific for day 3 embryos: a preliminary study. Hum Reprod 15:2190–2196

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Veeck LL, Bodine R, Clarke RN, Berrios R, Libraro J, Moschini RM, Zaninovic N, Rosenwaks Z (2004) High pregnancy rates can be achieved after freezing and thawing human blastocysts. Fertil Steril 82:1418–1427

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Esinler I, Bayar U, Bozdag G, Yarali H (2005) Outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome or isolated polycystic ovaries. Fertil Steril 84:932–937

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ebner T (2006) Is oocyte morphology prognostic of embryo developmental potential after ICSI? Reprod BioMed Online 12:507–512

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kahraman S, Yakin K, Dönmez E et al. (2000) Relationship between granular cytoplasm of oocytes and pregnancy outcome following intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum Reprod 15:2390–2393

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ebner T, Sommergruber M, Moser M, Sheb O, Schreier-Lechner E, Tews G (2006) Basal level of anti-Müllerian hormone is associated with oocyte quality in stimulated cycles. Hum Reprod 21:2022–2026

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Otsuki J, Okada A, Morimoto K et al (2004) The relationship between pregnancy outcome and smooth endoplasmic reticulum clusters in MII human oocytes. Hum Reprod 19:1591–1597

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Hardy K, Robinson FM, Paraschos T, Wicks R, Franks S, Winston RM (1995) Normal development and metabolic activity of preimplantation embryos in vitro from patients with polycystic ovaries. Hum Reprod 10:2125–2135

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Norman RJ, Davies MJ, Lord J, Moran LJ (2002) The role of lifestyle modification in polycystic ovary syndrome. Trends Endocrinol Metab 13:251–257

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Regan L, Owen EJ, Jacobs HS (1990) Hypersecretion of luteinising hormone, infertility, and miscarriage. Lancet 336:1141–1144

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Balen AH, Tan SL, MacDougall J, Jacobs S (1993) Miscarraige rates following in vitro fertilization are increased in women with polycystic ovaries and reduced by pituitary desinsitisation with buserelin. Hum Reprod 8:959–964

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Homburg R, Lewy T, Berkovitz D et al (1993) Gonadotropin releasing harmone antagonist reduces the miscarriage rate for pregnancy achieved in women with polycystic ovarian syndrome. Fertil Steril 59:527–531

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Rai R, Backos M, Rushworth F, Regan L (2000) Polycystic ovaries and recurrent miscarriage—a reappraisal. Hum Reprod 15:612–615

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Franks S, Roberts R, Hardy K (2003) Gonadotrophin regimens and oocyte quality in women with polycystic ovaries. Reprod Biomed Online 6:181–184

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Mikkelsen AL, Lindenberg S (2001) Morphology of in-vitro matured oocytes: impact on fertility potential and embryo quality. Hum Reprod 16:1714–1718

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Banchhita Sahu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sahu, B., Ozturk, O., Ranierri, M. et al. Comparison of oocyte quality and intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcome in women with isolated polycystic ovaries or polycystic ovarian syndrome. Arch Gynecol Obstet 277, 239–244 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-007-0462-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-007-0462-x

Keywords

Navigation