Abstract
Objective
To assess the reproductive benefits of hysteroscopic polypectomy in previous infertile women depending on the size or number of the polyps.
Design and methods
In this retrospective study, from February 2000 to September 2005, totally 83 selected women were included with: a) diagnoses of primary or secondary infertility, endometrial polyp/polyps and abnormal uterine bleeding. Endometrial polyps were diagnosed by transvaginal ultrasound followed by diagnostic hysteroscopy, to confirm diagnosis, and hysteroscopic polypectomy. All 83 subjects who consisted the study group, met inclusion criteria: age under 35 years, at least 12 months of infertility, from 3 to 8 months menstrual disorders (intermenstrual bleeding or spotting, menometrorrhagia or menorrhagia) and from 3 to 18 months of follow-up with attempts to conceive after hysteroscopic polypectomy. The endometrial polyp/polyps appeared to be the only reason to explain their infertility after infertility workup of the couples. There was a comparison of fertility rates after hysteroscopic polypectomy between patients having endometrial polyp ≤ 1 cm and patients with bigger or multiple polyps.
Results
Of the 83 subjects, all were found to have endometrial polyps in diagnostic hysteroscopy, confirmed at histologic examination after hysteroscopic polypectomy. Among patients of the study group, there were no significant differences in age, type or length of infertility, or follow-up period after the procedure. The mean size of the endometrial polyps was 1.9 ± 1.4.cm. Thirty-one patients had endometrial polyp ≤ 1 cm and 52 patients had bigger or multiple endometrial polyps. Following polypectomy, menstrual pattern was normalized in 91.6% of patients. Spontaneous pregnancy and delivery at term rates, in the total population of the study, increased after the procedure and were 61.4% and 54.2% respectively. There was no statistical difference in fertility rates between patients having polyps ≤ 1 cm and patients having >1 cm polyps or multiple polyps. Spontaneous abortion rate in the first trimester of pregnancy was 6% of the total number of patients and there was no statistical difference between patients with small or bigger/multiple polyps. Type of infertility did not affect fertility rates after hysteroscopic polypectomy. Complication rate after hysteroscopic polypectomy was as low as 2.4%, while recurrence rate of the procedure reached 4.9% of patients.
Conclusion
Hysteroscopic polypectomy of endometrial polyps appeared to improve fertility and increase pregnancy rates in previous infertile women with no other reason to explain their infertility, irrespective of the size or number of the polyps. Type of infertility of patients seems not to affect fertility rates after hysteroscopic polypectomy. Menstrual pattern was normalized in the majority of patients after hysteroscopic polypectomy. In addition, hysteroscopic polypectomy is a safe procedure with low complication rate.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Valle RF (1984) Therapeutic hysteroscopy in infertility. Int J Fertil 29:143–48
Blank B (2002) Endometrial polyps. In: Blanc B, Marty R, de Montgolfier R (eds) Office and operative hysteroscopy, Springer, Heidelberg, p 173
Youfang W, Meiling H, Caijuan L, Aida S (1992) The value of hysteroscopy in the diagnosis of infertility and habitual abortion. Chin Med Sci J 7:226–229
Bakour SH, Khan KS, Gupta JK (2000) The risk of premalignant and malignant pathology in endometrial polyps. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 79:317–320
Bradley LD, Pasuqaloto EB, Price LL et al (2000) Hysteroscopic management of endometrial polyps. Obstet Gynecol 95(4 suppl):S23
Varasteh NH, Neurith RS, Levin B et al (1999) Pregnancy rates after hysteroscopic polypectomy and myomectomy in infertile women. Obstet Gynecol 94:168–171
Spiewankiewcz B, Stelmachov J, Sawicki W, Cedrowski K, Wypych P, Swiderska K (2003) The effectiveness of hysteroscopic polypectomy in female infertility. Clin Obstet Gynecol 30:23–25
Perez-Medina T, Bajo-Arenas J, Salazar F, Redondo T, Sanfrutos L, Alvarez P, Engels V (2005) Emdometrial polyps and their implication in the pregnancy rates of patients undergoing intrauterine insemination: a prospective, randomized study. Hum Reprod 20(6):1632–1635
Lass A, Williams G, Abusheikha N et al (1999) The effect of endometrial polyps on outcomes of in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles. J Assist Reprod Genet 16:410–415
Shoekir TA, Shalan HM, El Shafei MM (2004) Significance of endometrial polyps detected hysteroscopically in eumenorrhoeic women. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 30(2):84–89
Preutthipan S, Herabutya Y (2005) Hysteroscopic polypectomy in 240 premenopausal and postmenopausal women. Fertil Steril 83(3):705–9
Muzii L, Bellati F, Pernice M, Manci N, Angioli R, Panici PB (2007) Resectoscopic versus bipolar electrode excision of endometrial polyps: a randomized study. Fertil Steril 87(4):909–917. Epub 18 Jan 2007
Henriquez DD, van Dongen H, Wolterbeek R, Jansen FW (2007) Polypectomy in premenopausal women with abnormal uterine bleeding: effectiveness of hysteroscopic removal. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 14(1):59–63
Lieng M, Qvigstad E, Sandvik L, Jorgensen H, Langebrekke A, Istre O (2007) Hysteroscopic resection of symptomatic and asymptomatic endometrial polyps. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 14(2):189–194
Fernandez-Parra J, Rodriquez Oliver A, Lopez Criado S, Parrilla Fernandez F, Montoya Ventoso F (2006) Hysteroscopic evaluation of endometrial polyps. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 95(2):144–148. Epub 22 Aug 2006
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stamatellos, I., Apostolides, A., Stamatopoulos, P. et al. Pregnancy rates after hysteroscopic polypectomy depending on the size or number of the polyps. Arch Gynecol Obstet 277, 395–399 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-007-0460-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-007-0460-z