Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Sexual function after surgery for stress urinary incontinence: vaginal sling versus Burch colposuspension

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

We prospectively investigated the effect of surgery for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) on sexual function and also compared preoperative and postoperative sexual functions according to vaginal or abdominal surgery for SUI.

Methods

The study included 94 women who underwent surgery for SUI, and the women were divided into two groups: 53 women had vaginal sling, and 41 women had Burch colposuspension. Female sexual function was evaluated with a detailed 19-item questionnaire, the female sexual function index (FSFI), including sexual desire, arousal, lubrication, orgasm, satisfaction, and pain. In all women, sexual function was compared before and after surgery for SUI, and the differences in postoperative sexual functions were also compared between the women undergoing vaginal sling and Burch colposuspension.

Results

In all women, total sexual function score significantly decreased from 20.8 ± 9 to 17.3 ± 9.3 after surgery (P = 0.000). Total sexual function score decreased from 19.2 ± 10 to 17.2 ± 9.9 in the vaginal sling group and decreased from 23.6 ± 6.2 to 17.6 ± 7.7 in the Burch colposuspension group, revealing significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.011). Statistically significantly higher decreases in postoperative sexual desire (P = 0.014), arousal (P = 0.026), lubrication (P = 0.004), and orgasm scores (P = 0.008) were also observed in the Burch colposuspension group than in the vaginal sling group. Based on total score, postoperative sexual function improved in 13 women (24.5%) of the vaginal sling group and in 5 women (12.2%) of the Burch colposuspension group, remained unchanged in 15 (28.3%) and 10 (24.4%), respectively, and deteriorated in 25 (47.2%) and 26 (63.4%), respectively.

Conclusion

Our findings show that sexual functions may be impaired after surgery for SUI. Burch colposuspension may deteriorate sexual functions much more than vaginal sling surgery in women. Therefore, women who will need surgery for SUI should be informed of the risk of deterioration of sexual function after surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Baessler K, Stanton SL (2004) Does Burch colposuspension cure coital incontinence? Am J Obstet Gynecol 190:1030–1033

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Barber MD, Visco AG, Wyman JF, Fantl JA, Bump RC (2002) Continence program for women research group: sexual function in women with urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 99:281–289

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Basson R, Leiblum S, Brotto L, Derogatis L, Fourcroy J, Fugl-Meyer K, et al (2003) Definitions of women’s sexual dysfunction reconsidered: advocating expansion and revision. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 24:221–229

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Berglung AL, Fugl-Meyer KS (1996) Some sexological characteristics of stress incontinent women. Scand J Urol Nephrol 30:207–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bortolotti A, Bernardini B, Colli E, Benedetto PD, Nacci GG, Landoni M, Lavezzari M, Pagliarulo A, et al (2000) Prevalence and risk factors for urinary incontinence in Italy. Eur Urol 37:30–35

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Çayan S, Akbay E, Bozlu M, Canpolat B, Acar D, Ulusoy E (2004) The prevalence of female sexual dysfunction and potential risk factors that may impaire sexual function in Turkish women. Urol Int 72:52–57

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Çayan S, Bozlu M, Canpolat B, Akbay E (2005) The assessment of sexual functions in women with male partners complaining of erectile dysfunction: does treatment of male sexual dysfunction improve female partner’s sexual functions? J Sex Marital Ther 30:333–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Digesu GA, Chaliha C, Salvatore S, Hutchings A, Khullar V (2005) The relationship of vaginal prolapse severity to symptoms and quality of life. BJOG 112:971–976

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Doruk E, Akbay E, Çayan S, Akbay E, Bozlu M, Acar D (2005) Effect of diabetes mellitus on female sexual function and risk factors. Arch Androl 51:1–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Glavind K, Tetsche MS (2004) Sexual function in women before and after suburethral sling operation for stress urinary incontinence: a retrospective questionnaire study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 83:965–968

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Haase P, Skibsted L (1988) Influence of operations for stress incontinence and/or genital descensus on sexual life. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 67:659–661

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Handa VL, Harvey L, Cundiff GW, Siddique SA, Kjerulff KH (2004) Sexual function among women with urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 191:751–756

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hilliges M, Falsoner C, Ekman-Orderberg G (1995) Innervations of the vaginal mucosa as revealed by PGP9.5 immunohistochemistry. Acta Anat 153:119–126

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Helström L, Nilsson B (2005) Impact of vaginal surgery on sexuality and quality of life in women with urinary incontinence or genital descensus. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 84:79–84

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Iskander MN, Kapoor DS, Mohammed A (2003) Subjective outcomes of the TVT procedure. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 83:69–70

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Laumann EO, Nicolosi A, Glasser DB, Paik A, Gingell C, Moreira E, Wang T, GSSAB Investigators’ group (2005) Sexual problems among women and men aged 40–80 y: prevalence and correlates identified in the Global Study of Sexual Attitudes and Behaviours. Int J Impot Res 17:39–57

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Lemack G, Zimmern P (2000) Sexual function after vaginal surgery for stress incontinence. Results of a mail questionnaire. Urology 56:223–227

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Maaita M, Bhaumik J, Davies AE (2002) Sexual function after using tension-free vaginal tape for the surgical treatment of genuine stress incontinence. BJU Int 90:540–543

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Maas CP, ter Kuile MM, Laan E, Tuijnman CC, Weijenborg PhThM, Trimbos JB, Kenter GG (2004) Objective assessment of sexual arousal in women with a history of hysterectomy. BJOG 111:456–462

  20. Olsen AL, Smith VJ, Bergstrom JO, Colling JC, Clark AL (1997) Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 89:501–506

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ponholzer A, Roehlich M, Racz U, Temml C, Madersbacher S (2005) Female sexual dysfunction in a healthy Austrian cohort: prevalence and risk factors. Eur Urol 47:366–375

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Roose SP, Glassman AH, Seidman SN (2001) Relationship between depression and other medical illnesses. JAMA 286:1687–1690

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Rosen R, Brown C, Heiman J, Leiblum S, Meston C, Shabsigh R, Ferguson D, D’Agostino R (2000) The female sexual function index (FSFI): a multidimensional self-report instrument for the assessment of female sexual function. J Sex Marital Ther 26:191–208

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Salonia A, Zanni G, Nappi RE, Briganti A, Deho F, Fabbri F, et al (2004) Sexual dysfunction is common in women with lower urinary tract symptoms and urinary incontinence: results of a cross-sectional study. Eur Urol 45:642–648

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Shah SM, Bukkapatnam R, Rodriguez LV (2005) Impact of vaginal surgery for stress urinary incontinence on female sexual function: is the use of polypropylene mesh detrimental? Urology 65:270–274

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Shaw C (2002) A systematic review of the literature on the prevalence of sexual impairment in women with urinary incontinence and the prevalence of urinary leakage during sexual activity. Eur Urol 42:432–440

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Stanton SL (1990) Surgical management of urethral sphincter incompetence. Clin Obstet Gynecol 33:346–357

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Stenberg A, Heimer G, Ulmsten U, Cnattingius S (1996) Prevalence of genitourinary and other climacteric symptoms in 61-year-old women. Maturitas 24:31–36

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Thakar R, Mayonda I, Stanton SL (1997) Bladder, bowel, and sexual dysfunction after hysterectomy for benign conditions. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 104:983–987

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Tunuguntla HS, Gousse AE (2006) Female sexual dysfunction following vaginal surgery: a review. J Urol 175:439–446

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Filiz Çayan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Çayan, F., Dilek, S., Akbay, E. et al. Sexual function after surgery for stress urinary incontinence: vaginal sling versus Burch colposuspension. Arch Gynecol Obstet 277, 31–36 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-007-0418-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-007-0418-1

Keywords

Navigation