Abstract
Objective
There are many methods of treatment of vaginal agenesis.
Methods
In this study, patients who underwent McIndoe vaginoplasty were evaluated for development of vaginal mucosa. Vaginal pH measurements, smears, and punch biopsies were obtained from seven patients postoperatively at 3, 6, and 12 months after having McIndoe vaginoplasty.
Results
Neovaginal smears indicated no specific data for mucosal development at the 3rd and 6th month after the operation. However, Doderlein bacilli were determined at the 12th month. Histopathological examination of punch biopsies revealed dermal and subdermal thickening at the 3rd month, partial adaptation to mucosa at 6th month, and full adaptation to mucosa at 12th month. Also normal vaginal pH levels were recorded at the 12th month.
Conclusion
As a result of the adaptation process, the split thickness skin graft acquired both histological and physiological characteristics of normal vaginal mucosa. Also, neovaginal epithelium was evaluated to be macroscopically similar to normal vaginal mucosa, 12 months after the operation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Rock JA (1997) Surgery for anomalies of the mullerian ducts. In: Rock JA, Thompson JD (eds) Te Linde’s operative gynecology. 8th edn. Lippincott-Raven Publishers, Philadelphia, pp 687
Sadove RC, Horton CE (1988) Utilizing full-thickness skin grafts for vaginal reconstruction. Clin Plast Surg 15:443–448
Hockel M, Menke H, Germann G (2003) Vaginoplasty with split skin grafts from the scalp: optimization of the surgical treatment for vaginal agenesis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 188:1100–2
Tercan M, Balat O, Bekerecioglu M, Atik B (2002) The use of fibrin glue in the McIndoe technique of vaginoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 109:706–709
Folch M, Pigem I, Konje JC (2000) Mullerian agenesis: etiology, diagnosis, and management. Obstet Gynecol Surv 55:644–649
Simman R, Jackson IT, Andrus L (2002) Prefabricated buccal mucosa-lined flap in an animal model that could be used for vaginal reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 109:1044–1049
Karim RB, Hage IJ, Dekker IJ, Schoot CM (1995) Evolution of the methods of neovaginoplasty for vaginal aplasia. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 58:19–27
Hockel M, Menke H, Germann G (2003) Vaginoplasty with split skin grafts from the scalp: optimization of the surgical treatment for vaginal agenesis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 188:1100–1102
Johnson N, Batchelor A, Lilford RJ (1991) Experience with tissue expansion vaginoplasty. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 98:564–568
Johnson N, Lilford RJ, Batchelor A (1991) The free-flap vaginoplasty; a new surgical procedure for the treatment of vaginal agenesis. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 98:184–188
Yesim OG, Ozcan M (2003) Neovaginal construction with buccal mucosal grafts. Plast Reconstr Surg 111:2250–2254
Hallberg H, Holmstrom H (2003) Vaginal construction with skin grafts and vacuum-assisted closure. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 37:97–101
Toolenaar TA, Freundt I, Wagenvoort JH, Huikeshoven FJ, Vogel M, Jeekel H, Drogendijk AC (1993) Bacterial flora of the sigmoid neovagina. J Clin Microbiol 31:3314–3316
De Filippo RE, Yoo JJ, Atala A (2003) Engineering of vaginal tissue in vivo. Tissue Eng 9:301–306
Seccia A, Salgarello M, Sturla M, Loreti A, Latorre S, Farallo E (2002) Neovaginal reconstruction with the modified McIndoe technique: a review of 32 cases. Ann Plast Surg 49:379–384
Lelle RJ, Heidrenreich W, Schneider J (1990) Cytologic findings after construction of a neovagina using two surgical procedures. Surg Gynecol Obstet 170:21–24
Alessandrescu D, Peltecu GC, Buhimschi CS, Buhimschi IA (1996) Neocolpopoiesis with split-thickness skin graft as a surgical treatment of vaginal agenesis: retrospective review of 201 cases. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175:131–138
Belleannee G, Brun JL, Trouette H, Mompart JP, Goussot JF, Brun G (1998) Cytologic findings in a neovagina created with Vecchietti’s technique for treating vaginal aplasia. Acta Cytol 42:945–948
Takashina T Takashina T, Kanda Y, Tsumura N, Hayakawa O, Tanaka S, Ito E (1988) Postoperative changes in vaginal smears after vaginal reconstruction with a free skin graft. Acta Cytol 32:109–112
Masters WH, Johnson VW (1961) The artificial vagina: anatomic, physiologic, psychosexual function. West J Surg 69:192–212
Pierce GW, Klabunde EH, O’connor GB, Long AH (1956) Changes in skin flap of a constructed vagina due to environment. Am J Surg 92:4–8
Lepargneur JP, Rousseau V (2002) Protective role of the Doderlein flora. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod 31:485–494
Gallup DG, Castle CA, Stock RJ (1987) Recurrent carcinoma in situ of the vagina following split thickness skin graft vaginoplasty. Gynecol Oncol 26:98–102
Steiner E, Woernle F, Kuhn W, Beckmann K, Schmidt M, Pilch H, Knapstein PG (2002) Carcinoma of the neovagina: case report and review of the literature. Gynecol Oncol 84:171–175
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bekerecioglu, M., Balat, O., Tercan, M. et al. Adaptation process of the skin graft to vaginal mucosa after McIndoe vaginoplasty. Arch Gynecol Obstet 277, 551–554 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-007-0403-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-007-0403-8