Skip to main content
Log in

Gestational diabetes: relevance of diagnostic criteria and preventive strategies for Type 2 diabetes mellitus

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

Women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) are at risk to develop Type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2). The aim of this study was to compare the effect of three international diagnostic criteria on the prevalence of GDM with its implications for prevention of DM2 in the population.

Materials and methods

One thousand one hundred and seventy-two pregnant women, who underwent the 75-g oral glucose tolerance test for routine, antenatal GDM screening, were classified using the criteria of the American Diabetes Association (ADA), the World Health Organization (WHO) and Australasian Diabetes in Pregnancy Society (ADIPS). The population-attributable risk, (PAR) was used to estimate the proportion of women with DM2 in the community, who may have been identified much in advance for intervention, by a GDM pregnancy.

Results

Using the ADA, WHO and ADPIS criteria, respectively: (a) the prevalence of GDM was 166 (14.2%), 242 (20.6%) and 271 (23.1%) (p < 0.0001); (b) The PAR (95% CI) was 42% (31–52%); 51% (39–62%) and 54% (42–64%). Overall, by all three criteria, 132 (11.3%) women had GDM while 859 (73.3%) were without GDM; the remaining 181 (15.4%) women had classification differences between them.

Conclusion

The universal acceptance and the ability of the WHO criteria to detect over half the women with DM2 earlier during pregnancy, makes it ideally suited to identify women with GDM.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wild S, Roglic G, Green A, Sicree R, King H (2004) Global prevalence of diabetes: estimates for the year 2000 and projections for 2030. Diabetes Care 27:1047–1053

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cheung NW, Byth K (2003) Population health significance of gestational diabetes. Diabetes Care 26:2005–2009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Greene MF (1997) Screening for gestational diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 337:1625–1626

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kim C, Newton KM, Knopp RH (2002) Gestational diabetes and the incidence of type 2 diabetes: a systematic review. Diabetes Care 25:1862–1868

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ben-Haroush A, Yogev Y, Hod M (2004) Epidemiology of gestational diabetes mellitus and its association with Type 2 diabetes. Diabet Med 21:103–113

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group (2002) Reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes with lifestyle intervention or metformin. N Engl J Med 346:393–403

    Google Scholar 

  7. Buchanan TA, Xiang AH, Peters RK, Kjos SL, Marroquin A, Goico J, et al (2002) Preservation of pancreatic beta-cell function and prevention of type 2 diabetes by pharmacological treatment of insulin resistance in high-risk hispanic women. Diabetes 51:2796–2803

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. International Diabetes Federation (2003) Diabetes e-Atlas, 2nd edn. International Diabetes Federation, Brussels

  9. Agarwal MM, Hughes PF, Punnose J, Ezimokhai M (2000) Fasting plasma glucose as a screening test for gestational diabetes in a multi-ethnic, high-risk population. Diabet Med 17:720–726

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (2004) Position statement American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care 27(Suppl. 1):S88–S90

    Google Scholar 

  11. World Health Organization (1999) Definition, diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus and its complications. Part 1. Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Report of a WHO Consultation. WHO, Geneva

  12. The Australasian Diabetes in Pregnancy Society (1998) Gestational diabetes mellitus guidelines. Med J Aust. 169:93–97

    Google Scholar 

  13. Agarwal MM, Dhatt GS, Punnose J, Koster G (2005) Gestational diabetes: dilemma caused by multiple international diagnostic criteria. Diabet Med 22:1731–1736

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Sacks DB, Bruns DE, Goldstein DE, Maclaren NK, McDonald JM, Parrott M (2002) Guidelines and recommendations for laboratory analysis in the diagnosis and management of diabetes mellitus. Clin Chem 48:436–472

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Brody SC, Harris R, Lohr K (2003) Screening for gestational diabetes: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Obstet Gynecol 101:380–392

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Daniells S, Grenyer BF, Davis WS, Coleman KJ, Burgess JA, Moses RG (2003) Gestational diabetes mellitus: is a diagnosis associated with an increase in maternal anxiety and stress in the short and intermediate term? Diabetes Care 26:385–389

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Schmidt MI, Duncan BB, Reichelt AJ, Branchtein L, Matos MC, Costa e Forti A, et al (2001) Brazilian Gestational Diabetes Study Group. Gestational diabetes mellitus diagnosed with a 2-h 75-g oral glucose tolerance test and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Diabetes Care 24:1151–1155

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Fraser R (2006) Gestational diabetes: after the ACHOIS trial. Diabet Med 23(Suppl 1):8–11

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Watson D, Rowan J, Neale L, Battin MR (2003). Admissions to neonatal intensive care unit following pregnancies complicated by gestational or type 2 diabetes. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 43:429–432

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. HAPO Study Cooperative Research Group (2002) Special communication: the hyperglycemia and adverse pregnancy outcome (HAPO) study. Int J Gynecol Obstet 78:69–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

We would like to thank Ms. A. Matera for help with data collection and data entry.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mukesh M. Agarwal.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Agarwal, M.M., Dhatt, G.S., Zayed, R. et al. Gestational diabetes: relevance of diagnostic criteria and preventive strategies for Type 2 diabetes mellitus. Arch Gynecol Obstet 276, 237–243 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-007-0334-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-007-0334-4

Keywords

Navigation