Abstract
A 56-year-old post-menopausal woman presented with abdominal swelling and shortness of breath. An evaluation of abdomen and pelvis showed ascites and a solid mass. Serum CA-125 level was elevated (509 IU/ml). A computerized tomography–angiography was performed since the pulses of upper extremities could not be palpated. The patient was diagnosed to be suffering from Takayasu arteritis. The exploratory laparotomy revealed a fibroma of the ovary.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abad A, Cazorla E, Ruiz F, Aznar I, Asins E, Llixiona J (1999) Meigs’ syndrome with elevated CA125: case report and review of the literature . Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 82:97–99
Viera SC, Pimental LH, Ribeiro JD, de Andrdade Neto AF, de Santana JO (2003) Meigs’ syndrome with elevated CA 125: case report. Sao Paulo Med J 121:210–212
Morell ND, Frost D, Ziel HK (1980) Pseudo Meigs’ syndrome. A case report. J Reprod Med 25:88–90
Maskovic J, Jankovic S, Lusic I, Cambj-Sapunar L, Mimica Z, Bacic A (1999) Subclavian artery stenosis caused by non-specific arteritis (Takayasu disease): treatment with Palmaz stent. Eur J Radiol 31:193–196
Buttin BM, Cohn DE, Herzog TJ (2001) Meigs’ syndrome with an elevated CA 125 from benign Brenner tumors. Obstet Gynecol 98:980–982
Bokhari A, Rosenfeld GS, Cracchiolo B, Heller DS (2003) Cystic struma ovarii presenting with ascites and an elevated CA-125 level. A case report. J Reprod Med 48:52–56
Zannoni GF, Gallotta V, Legge F, Tarquini E, Scambia G, Ferrandina G (2004) Pseudo-Meigs’ syndrome associated with malignant struma ovarii: a case report. Gynecol Oncol 94:226–228
Huh JJ, Montz FJ, Bristow RE (2002) Struma ovarii associated with pseudo-Meigs’ syndrome and elevated serum CA 125. Gynecol Oncol 86:231–234
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Salman, M.C., Basaran, A., Guler, T. et al. Meigs’ syndrome with highly elevated ca. 125 levels in a patient with takayasu arteritis: a case report. Arch Gynecol Obstet 272, 90–92 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-005-0735-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-005-0735-1