Skip to main content
Log in

Shoulder dystocia: a comparison of patients with and without diabetes mellitus

  • Original article
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background: The study was aimed to compare pregnancies complicated with shoulder dystocia, of patients with and without diabetes mellitus. Methods: A comparison of all singleton, vertex, term deliveries between the years 1988–1999, complicated with shoulder dystocia with and without diabetes mellitus was performed. Statistical analysis was done using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Results: Using a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the area under the curve for birth weight was 0.92 (95% CI 0.90–0.93). However, for birth weight of 4,000 g the sensitivity was only 56% with specificity of 95%. While comparing shoulder dystocia between patients with (n=38) and without diabetes mellitus (n=207), neonates of the diabetic patients were significantly heavier (mean birth weight 4,244.2±515.1 vs. 4,051.6±389.5; P=0.008) and had higher rate of Apgar scores lower than 7 at 1 min (50.0% vs. 25.9%; P=0.030), but not at 5 min (2.6% vs. 2.0%; P=0.083) when compared to the non-diabetic group. No significant differences were noted regarding perinatal mortality between the groups (0% vs. 4.3%; P=0.362). Conclusions: The newborn of the diabetic mother complicated with shoulder dystocia does not appear to be at an increased risk for perinatal morbidity compared with the newborn of the non-diabetic mother.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Langer O, Berkus MD, Huff RW, Samueloff A (1991) Shoulder dystocia: should the fetus weighing greater than or equal to 4000 grams be delivered by cesarean section? Am J Obstet Gynecol 165:831–837

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ginsberg NA, Moisidis C (2001) How to predict shoulder dystocia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 184:1427–1430

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Christoffersson M, Rydhstroem H (2002) Shoulder dystocia and brachial plexus injury: a population-based study. Gynecol Obstet Invest 53:42–47

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. McFarland M, Hod M, Piper JM, Xenakis EMJ, Langer O (1995) Are labor abnormalities more common in shoulder dystocia?. Am J Obstet Gynecol 173:1211–1214

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. O’Leary JA, Leonetti HB (1990) Shoulder dystocia: prevention and treatment. Am J Obstet Gynecol 162:5–9

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Sheiner E, Levy A, Hershkovitz R, Hallak M, Hammel R, Katz M, Mazor M (2005) Determining factors associated with shoulder dystocia: a population-based study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol (in press).

  7. McFarland M, Trylovich CG, Langer O (1998) Anthropometric differences in macrosomic infants of diabetic and nondiabetic mothers. J Matern Fetal Med 7:292–295

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Acker DB, Gregory KD, Sachs BP, Friedman EA (1988) Risk factors for Erb-Duchenne palsy. Obstet Gynecol 71:389–392

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. White P (1978) Classification of obstetric diabetes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 130:228–230

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Cedergren MI (2004) Maternal morbid obesity and the risk of adverse pregnancy outcome. Obstet Gynecol 103:219–224

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sheiner E, Levy A, Menes TS, Silverberg D, Katz M, Mazor M (2004) Maternal obesity as an independent risk factor for caesarean delivery. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 18:196–201

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Jensen DM, Damm P, Sorensen B, Molsted-Pedersen L, Westergaard JG, Ovesen P, Beck-Nielsen H (2003) Pregnancy outcome and prepregnancy body mass index in 2459 glucose-tolerant Danish women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 189:239–244

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wagner RK, Nielsen PE, Gonik B (1999). Shoulder dystocia. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 26:371–383

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Gilbert WM, Nesbitt TS, Danielsen B (1999) Childbearing beyond age 40: pregnancy outcome in 24,032 cases. Obstet Gynecol 93:9–14

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Bianco A, Stone J, Lynch L, Lapinski R, Berkowitz G, Berkowitz RL (1996) Pregnancy outcome at age 40 and older. Obstet Gynecol 87:971–922

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eyal Sheiner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Levy, A., Sheiner, E., Hammel, R.D. et al. Shoulder dystocia: a comparison of patients with and without diabetes mellitus. Arch Gynecol Obstet 273, 203–206 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-005-0051-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-005-0051-9

Keywords

Navigation