Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Comparison of extension block pinning technique versus pin orthosis-extension block pinning technique for acute mallet fractures: a prospective randomized clinical trial

  • Handsurgery
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

The extension block pinning technique (EBPT) is a popular surgical treatment for mallet fractures; however, it has several drawbacks. The purpose of this randomized clinical trial was to compare EBPT to the pin orthosis-extension block pinning method (PO-EBPT) in the treatment of mallet fractures involving more than one-third of the joint surface but without primary joint dislocation.

Materials and methods

Sixty-five patients with mallet fractures were randomized into two groups between June 2017 and January 2020: Group I (33 patients) was treated with EBPT and group II (32 patients) was treated with PO-EBPT. Five patients were lost to follow up due to lack of follow-up and death. There were no significant differences in the clinical and demographic characteristics of both groups. Patients were evaluated according to fracture union, extension lag, distal interphalangeal (DIP) joint range of motion, Crawford’s criteria, and complication rates. The patients were followed-up post-operatively at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and annually thereafter.

Results

A total of 60 patients were randomized into two groups: one (30 patients) was treated with EBPT and the second (30 patients) with PO-EBPT. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of fracture union and active DIP joint flexion (P = 0.743 and P = 0.059, respectively). The mean extension lag of the DIP joint in the EBPT group was significantly greater than the PO-EBPT group (10° ± 9.47° vs. 4.17° ± 7.2°, P = 0.009). According to the Crawford criteria, the PO-EBPT group showed significantly better outcomes (P = 0.005). The complication rates were similar between groups (P = 0.45).

Conclusion

In comparison to the EBPT technique, the group of patients operated with PO-EBPT had superior clinical outcomes and less loss of extension at the DIP joint according to the Crawford’s criteria.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cheung JPY, Fung B, Ip WY (2012) Review on mallet finger treatment. Hand Surg 17(3):439–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wada T, Oda T (2015) Mallet fingers with bone avulsion and DIP joint subluxation. J Hand Surg Eur 40:8–15

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Yoon JO, Baek H, Kim JK (2017) The outcomes of extension block pinning and nonsurgical management for mallet fracture. J Hand Surg Am 42:387.e1-387.e7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bloom JM, Khouri JS, Hammert WC (2013) Current concepts in the evaluation and treatment of mallet finger injury. Plast Reconstr Surg 132:560–566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Giddins GE (2015) The non-operative management of hand fractures. J Hand Surg Eur 40:33–41

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kim JK, Kim DJ (2015) The risk factors associated with subluxation of the distal interphalangeal joint in mallet fracture. J Hand Surg Eur 40:63–67

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lin JS, Samora JB (2018) Surgical and nonsurgical management of mallet finger: a systematic review. J Hand Surg Am 43:146–63. e2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Damron TA, Engber WD (1994) Surgical treatment of mallet finger fractures by tension band technique. Clin Orthop Relat Res 300:133–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Pegoli L, Toh S, Arai K, Fukuda A, Nishikawa S, Vallejo IG (2003) The Ishiguro extension block technique for the treatment of mallet finger fracture: indications and clinical results. J Hand Surg Br 28:15–17

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Lubahn JD (1989) Mallet finger fractures: a comparison of open and closed technique. J Hand Surg Am 14:394–396

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kronlage SC, Faust D (2004) Open reduction and screw fixation of mallet fractures. J Hand Surg Br 29:135–138

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhang X, Meng H, Shao X, Wen S, Zhu H, Mi X (2010) Pull-out wire fixation for acute mallet finger fractures with k-wire stabilization of the distal interphalangeal joint. J Hand Surg Am 35:1864–1869

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Teoh LC, Lee JY (2007) Mallet fractures: a novel approach to internal fixation using a hook plate. J Hand Surg Eur 32:24–30

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ishiguro T, Itoh Y, Yabe Y, Hashizume N (1997) Extension block with Kirschner wire for fracture dislocation of the distal interphalangeal joint. Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg 1:95–102

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hofmeister EP, Mazurek MT, Shin AY, Bishop AT (2003) Extension block pinning for large mallet fractures. J Hand Surg Am 28:453–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lee YH, Kim JY, Chung MS, Baek GH, Gong HS, Lee SK (2009) Two extension block Kirschner wire technique for mallet finger fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br 91:1478–1481

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Çapkın S, Buyuk AF, Sürücü S, Bakan OM, Atlihan D (2019) Extension-block pinning to treat bony mallet finger: Is a transfixation pin necessary? Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg 25:281–286

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kim JH, Lee S, Kim DG (2013) Delta wire technique for bony mallet finger: surgical technique. J Korean Orthop Res Soc 16:13–16

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Chee WH, Gunasagaran J, Ahmad TS (2020) A comparison of delta wire technique versus extension block pinning in the treatment of bony Mallet finger. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 52:176–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Crawford GP (1984) The molded polythene splint for mallet finger deformities. J Hand Surg Am 9:231–237

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Jörgsholm P, Björkman A, Emmeluth C, Björkman-Burtscher IM (2010) Extension block pinning of mallet fractures. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 44:54–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Toker S, Türkmen F, Pekince O, Korucu İ, Karalezli N (2015) Extension block pinning versus hook plate fixation for treatment of mallet fractures. J Hand Surg Am 40:1591–1596

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Tetik C, Gudemez E (2002) Modification of the extension block Kirschner wire technique for mallet fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 404:284–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Thillemann JK, Thillemann TM, Kristensen PK, Foldager-Jensen AD, Munk B (2020) Splinting versus extension-block pinning of bony mallet finger: a randomized clinical trial. J Hand Surg Eur 45:574–581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Akgun U, Bulut T, Zengin EC, Zengin EC, Tahta M, Sener M (2016) Extension block technique for mallet fractures: a comparison of one and two dorsal pins. J Hand Surg Eur 41:701–706

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Acar MA, Guzel Y, Gulec A, Güleç A, Uzer G, Elmadağ M (2015) Clinical comparison of hook plate fixation versus extension block pinning for bony mallet finger: a retrospective comparison study. J Hand Surg Eur 40:832–839

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Darder-Prats A, Fernandez-Garcia E, Fernandez-Gabarda R, Darder-Garcia A (1998) Treatment of mallet finger fractures by the extension-block K-wire technique. J Hand Surg 23:802–805

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Bendre AA, Hartigan BJ, Kalainov DM (2005) Mallet finger. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 13:336–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Katzman BM, Klein DM, Mesa J, Geller J, Caligiuri DA (1999) Immobilization of the mallet finger: effects on the extensor tendon. J Hand Surg Br 24:80–84

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Karslıoğlu B, Uzun M, Tetik C, Tasatan E, Tekin AC, Buyukkurt CD (2018) Derotation of the mallet piece: a crucial point in mallet fracture surgery. Hand Surg Rehabil. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hansur.2018.03.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Haseki Education Research Hospital, Ugur Mumcu Mahallesi, Belediye Sokak, No: 7 Sultangazi, Istanbul, Turkey

    Mahmud Aydin & Dogan Atlihan

  2. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Missouri Kansas City, Kansas City, MO, 64108, USA

    Serkan Surucu

  3. Aksaray University Education Research Hospital, Yeni Sanayi Mah, Tacin Cd., Aksaray Merkez, 68200, Aksaray, Turkey

    Sercan Capkin

Authors
  1. Mahmud Aydin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Serkan Surucu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sercan Capkin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Dogan Atlihan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mahmud Aydin.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None of the authors received any type of financial support that could be considered potential conflict of interest regarding the manuscript or its submission.

Ethical approval

Ethics committee approval was obtained (Decision No. 1482, 26/10/2018).

Informed consent

All the patients’ signed an informed consent form with statements such as “I voluntarily accept the participation in the clinical trial.”

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aydin, M., Surucu, S., Capkin, S. et al. Comparison of extension block pinning technique versus pin orthosis-extension block pinning technique for acute mallet fractures: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 142, 1301–1308 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-022-04348-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-022-04348-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation