Skip to main content
Log in

Patellar fractures in elderly patients: a multicenter computed tomography-based analysis

  • Orthopaedic Surgery
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

This study aimed to demonstrate the characteristics of patellar fractures and evaluate clinical outcomes in elderly patients.

Patients and methods

Medical records of patients aged ≥ 60 years who presented with patellar fractures were retrospectively reviewed from an institutionally approved multicenter (five institutions) orthopedic database. Patient characteristics and fracture patterns were identified, and the clinical outcomes were investigated. We compared differences according to the injury mechanism (low- vs. high-energy).

Results

A total of 202 patients [mean age, 69.4 years (range, 60–88 years); male, 89, female, 113] were included in this study. The mean follow-up period was 14.8 months (range 6–58 months), and 75% of the fractures were from low-energy injuries. According to the AO /OTA classification, the most common type was type C (136 cases, 67.3%; 33 cases, C1; 23, C2; and 80, C3), followed by type A (39 cases), type B (26 cases), and unclassified (1 case). The unclassified case was an intra-articular marginal impaction without cortical breakage. Computed tomography (CT) revealed that of the cases, 66.8% had an inferior pole involvement; 80.7%, a comminuted fragment; and 10.4%, an impacted fracture. A total of 166 fractures (82.2%) were treated surgically. The mean union time and range of motion were 13.1 weeks and 123.8° (range 30–150°), respectively. The Lysholm score was 82.1 ± 12.0, with 65.7% of the cases having excellent or good function. The complication rate was 12.4% (24 cases), including ten, four, two, and five cases of infection, fixation failure, nonunion, malunion, and pin migration, respectively. The reoperation rate was 26.4%.

Conclusion

Patellar fractures in the elderly were mostly from low-energy injuries, and types C3 and A1 were the most common. CT images demonstrated high rates of an inferior pole involvement and comminution. The complication and reoperation rates were relatively high.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bostrom A (1972) Fracture of the patella. A study of 422 patellar fractures. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 143:1–80

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Larsen P, Court-Brown CM, Vedel JO, Vistrup S, Elsoe R (2016) Incidence and epidemiology of patellar fractures. Orthopedics 39:e1154–e1158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Charlson M, Szatrowski TP, Peterson J, Gold J (1994) Validation of a combined comorbidity index. J Clin Epidemiol 47:1245–1251

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. ASo A (2014) ASA physical status classification system. ASA House of Delegates.

  5. Bergstrom U, Bjornstig U, Stenlund H, Jonsson H, Svensson O (2008) Fracture mechanisms and fracture pattern in men and women aged 50 years and older: a study of a 12-year population-based injury register, Umea, Sweden. Osteoporos Int 19:1267–1273

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Byun SE, Sim JA, Joo YB, Kim JW, Choi W, Na YG, Shon OJ (2019) Changes in patellar fracture characteristics: a multicenter retrospective analysis of 1596 patellar fracture cases between 2003 and 2017. Injury 50:2287–2291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kanis JA, Johnell O, Oden A, Johansson H, McCloskey E (2008) FRAX and the assessment of fracture probability in men and women from the UK. Osteoporos Int 19:385–397

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Carbone S, Mezzoprete R, Papalia M, Arceri V, Carbone A, Gumina S (2018) Radiographic patterns of osteoporotic proximal humerus fractures. Eur J Radiol 100:43–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cole RJ, Bindra RR, Evanoff BA, Gilula LA, Yamaguchi K, Gelberman RH (1997) Radiographic evaluation of osseous displacement following intra-articular fractures of the distal radius: reliability of plain radiography versus computed tomography. J Hand Surg Am 22:792–800

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Lazaro LE, Wellman DS, Pardee NC, Gardner MJ, Toro JB, Macintyre NR 3rd, Helfet DL, Lorich DG (2013) Effect of computerized tomography on classification and treatment plan for patellar fractures. J Orthop Trauma 27:336–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Feibel RJ, Dehghan N, Cwinn AA (2007) Irreducible lateral patellar dislocation: the importance of impaction fracture recognition. J Emerg Med 33:11–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Miller MA, Liu W, Zurakowski D, Smith RM, Harris MB, Vrahas MS (2012) Factors predicting failure of patella fixation. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 72:1051–1055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Smith ST, Cramer KE, Karges DE, Watson JT, Moed BR (1997) Early complications in the operative treatment of patella fractures. J Orthop Trauma 11:183–187

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Oh HK, Choo SK, Kim JW, Lee M (2015) Internal fixation of displaced inferior pole of the patella fractures using vertical wiring augmented with Krachow suturing. Injury 46:2512–2515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Yang KH, Byun YS (2003) Separate vertical wiring for the fixation of comminuted fractures of the inferior pole of the patella. J Bone Joint Surg Br 85:1155–1160

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Cho JW, Kim J, Cho WT, Gujjar PH, Oh CW, Oh JK (2018) Comminuted inferior pole fracture of patella can be successfully treated with rim-plate-augmented separate vertical wiring. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 138:195–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Jang JH, Rhee SJ, Kim JW (2019) Hook plating in patella fractures. Injury 50:2084–2088

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Matejcic A, Smiljanic B, Bekavac-Beslin M, Ledinsky M, Puljiz Z (2006) The basket plate in the osteosynthesis of comminuted fractures of distal pole of the patella. Injury 37:525–530

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Dy CJ, Little MT, Berkes MB, Ma Y, Roberts TR, Helfet DL, Lorich DG (2012) Meta-analysis of re-operation, nonunion, and infection after open reduction and internal fixation of patella fractures. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 73:928–932

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kadar A, Sherman H, Glazer Y, Katz E, Steinberg EL (2015) Predictors for nonunion, reoperation and infection after surgical fixation of patellar fracture. J Orthop Sci 20:168–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ji Wan Kim.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors (Jae-Ang Sim, Yong Bum Joo, Wonchul Choi, Seong-Eun Byun, Oog-Jin Shon, and Ji Wan Kim) declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sim, JA., Joo, Y.B., Choi, W. et al. Patellar fractures in elderly patients: a multicenter computed tomography-based analysis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 141, 1439–1445 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-020-03526-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-020-03526-z

Keywords

Navigation