Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Patient age of less than 55 years is not an independent predictor of functional improvement or satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty

  • Knee Arthroplasty
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Management of the young patient with end-stage osteoarthritis of the knee is difficult, with surgical options of osteotomy, partial or total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The primary aim of this study was to assess whether age of less than 55 years was an independent predictor of functional outcome and satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The secondary aims were to identify pre-operative differences in patient demographics, comorbidity and function between patients less than 55 years old compared to those 55 years old and over.

Materials and methods

A retrospective cohort consisting of 2589 patients undergoing a primary TKA was identified from an established arthroplasty database. Patient demographics, comorbidity, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and Short Form (SF) 12 scores were collected pre-operatively and 1 year post-operatively. In addition, patient satisfaction was assessed at 1 year. Regression analysis was used to identify independent pre-operative predictors of change in the WOMAC and SF-12 scores, and patient satisfaction.

Results

Patients less than 55 years old were significantly less likely to be satisfied with the overall outcome of their TKA (OR 0.4, p = 0.001). After adjusting for confounding variables age group was not an independent predictor of overall satisfaction with overall outcome (OR 0.71, p = 0.16). Independent predictors of an increased risk of dissatisfaction with the overall outcome at 1 year were depression (OR 0.58, p = 0.008) and worse pre-operative SF-12 MCS (p = 0.04).

Conclusion

Age of less than 55 years is not an independent predictor of functional outcome or rate of patient satisfaction after TKA. However, depression and poor mental health are significantly more prevalent in patients less than 55 years old and were independently associated with a lower satisfaction rate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dahl A, Robertsson O, Lidgren L (2010) Surgery for knee osteoarthritis in younger patients. Acta Orthop 81:161–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M (2007) Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Jt Surg Am 89:780–785

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bayliss LE, Culliford D, Monk AP, Glyn-Jones S, Prieto-Alhambra D, Judge A, Cooper C, Carr AJ, Arden NK, Beard DJ, Price AJ (2017) The effect of patient age at intervention on risk of implant revision after total replacement of the hip or knee: a population-based cohort study. Lancet 389:1424–1430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Aujla RS, Esler CN (2017) Total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis in patients less than fifty-five years of age: a systematic review. J Arthroplasty 32:2598–2603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lizaur-Utrilla A, Martinez-Mendez D, Miralles-Munoz FA, Marco-Gomez L, Lopez-Prats FA (2016) Comparable outcomes after total knee arthroplasty in patients under 55 years than in older patients: a matched prospective study with minimum follow-up of 10 years. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 25(11):3396–3402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Scott CEH, MacDonald D, Howie CR, Biant LC (2010) Predicting patient dissatisfaction following total knee replacement: a prospective study of 1217 cases. J Bone Jt Surg Br 92-B:1253–1258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bierke S, Petersen W (2017) Influence of anxiety and pain catastrophizing on the course of pain within the first year after uncomplicated total knee replacement: a prospective study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 137(12):1735–1742

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Clement ND, MacDonald D, Burnett R, Breusch SJ (2013) Diabetes does not influence the early outcome of total knee replacement: a prospective study assessing the Oxford knee score, short form 12, and patient satisfaction. Knee 20:437–441

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Clement ND, MacDonald D, Simpson AH, Burnett R (2013) Total knee replacement in patients with concomitant back pain results in a worse functional outcome and a lower rate of satisfaction. Bone Jt J 95-B:1632–1639

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Clement ND, MacDonald D, Burnett R (2013) Primary total knee replacement in patients with mental disability improves their mental health and knee function: a prospective study. Bone Jt J 95-B:360–366

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Stucki G, Sangha O, Stucki S, Michel BA, Tyndall A, Dick W, Theiler R (1998) Comparison of the WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities) osteoarthritis index and a self-report format of the self-administered Lequesne-Algofunctional index in patients with knee and hip osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr Cartil 6:79–86

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt LW (1988) Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol 15:1833–1840

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ware J Jr, Kosinski M, Keller SD (1996) A 12-item short-form health survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care 34:220–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Burch FX, Tarro JN, Greenberg JJ, Carroll WJ (2008) Evaluating the benefits of patterned stimulation in the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee: a multi-center, randomized, single-blind, controlled study with an independent masked evaluator. Osteoarthr Cartil 16:865–872

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Singh J, Sloan JA, Johanson NA (2010) Challenges with health-related quality of life assessment in arthroplasty patients: problems and solutions. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 18:72–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mahomed N, Gandhi R, Daltroy L, Katz JN (2011) The self-administered patient satisfaction scale for primary hip and knee arthroplasty. Arthritis 59:1253

    Google Scholar 

  17. Clement ND, MacDonald D, Simpson AH (2014) The minimal clinically important difference in the Oxford knee score and Short Form 12 score after total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22(8):1933–1939

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Escobar A, Quintana JM, Bilbao A, Arostegui I, Lafuente I, Vidaurreta I (2007) Responsiveness and clinically important differences for the WOMAC and SF-36 after total knee replacement. Osteoarthr Cartil 15(3):273–280

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Robertsson O, Dunbar M, Pehrsson T, Knutson K, Lidgren L (2000) Patient satisfaction after knee arthroplasty: a report on 27,372 knees operated on between 1981 and 1995 in Sweden. Acta Orthop 71(3):262–267

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Clement ND, Macdonald D, Burnett R, Simpson AHRW, Howie CR (2017) A patient’s perception of their hospital stay influences the functional outcome and satisfaction of total knee arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 137(5):693–700

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Clarke SP, Moghaddam NG, Das Nair R, Walsh DA, Scammell B (2016) Psychological therapies for improving outcomes after total hip or knee replacement in people with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012474

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Dixon KE, Keefe FJ, Scipio CD, Perri LM, Abernethy AP (2007) Psychological interventions for arthritis pain management in adults: a meta-analysis. Health Psychol 26(3):241–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Yohannes AM, Caton S (2010) Management of depression in older people with osteoarthritis: a systematic review. Aging Mental Health 14(6):637–651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Robertsson O, Dunbar M, Pehrsson T, Knutson K, Lidgren L (2000) Patient satisfaction after knee arthroplasty: a report on 27,372 knees operated on between 1981 and 1995 in Sweden. Acta Orthop Scand 71(3):262–267

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Goh GS, Liow MH, Razak HR, Tay DK, Lo NN, Yeo SJ (2017) Patient-reported outcomes, quality of life, and satisfaction rates in young patients aged 50 years or younger after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 32(2):419–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Scott CE, Oliver WM, MacDonald D, Wade FA, Moran M, Breusch SJ (2016) Predicting dissatisfaction following total knee arthroplasty in patients under 55 years of age. Bone Jt J 98-B:1625–1634

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Khatib Y, Jenkin D, Naylor JM, Harris IA (2016) Psychological traits in patients waiting for total knee arthroplasty. A cross-sectional study. J Arthroplasty 31(8):1661–1666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Wright GE, Parker JC, Smarr KL, Johnson JC, Hewett JE, Walker SE (1998) Age, depressive symptoms, and rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 41(2):298–305

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. C. Walker.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Mr. David Weir is a lecturer for Stryker. Mr. Jim Holland is a lecturer for ZimmerBiomet. Authors Mr. Nick Clement, Miss Lucy Walker, Ms. Michelle Bardgett, Mr. Craig Gerrand and Prof David Deehan declare no conflicts of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Clement, N.D., Walker, L.C., Bardgett, M. et al. Patient age of less than 55 years is not an independent predictor of functional improvement or satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 138, 1755–1763 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-018-3041-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-018-3041-7

Keywords

Navigation