Skip to main content
Log in

Biomechanical and microbiological effects of local vancomycin in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction: a porcine tendon model

  • Arthroscopy and Sports Medicine
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Although there is increasing evidence for the successful use of local vancomycin applied by soaked compresses during ACL reconstruction, there are still little data on its microbiological and biomechanical effects. Furthermore, exact dosage of vancomycin with respect to tendon stability and microbiological effectivity is still unknown.

Materials and methods

63 porcine flexor digitorum profundus tendons were harvested under sterile conditions from fresh cadaver legs. After contamination with Staphylococcus epidermidis (S. epidermidis), tendons were wrapped into sterile compresses moistened with different concentrations of vancomycin for 10 or 20 min. Sterile sodium chloride was used for control. After treatment, tendons were rolled onto blood-agar plates to test for residual bacterial contamination and tested for maximum load and stiffness using a uniaxial testing device with cryo-clamps for tendon fixation. Agar plates were checked after 1 week of culture at 36 °C for signs of bacterial growth.

Results

When applying vancomycin for only 10 min, bacterial contamination was found in all dosage groups ranging from 28.6% contamination (n = 2 of 7 tendons) when using 10 mg/ml up to 85.7% (n = 6 of 7 tendons) when using 1 mg/ml. Applying vancomycin-soaked compresses for 20 min, bacterial contamination was still found in the groups using 1 mg/ml and 2.5 mg/ml (contamination rate 85.7 and 42.9% respectively). When using 5 mg/ml and 10 mg/ml, no bacterial contamination could be perceived after 7 days of culture. With regard to biomechanical properties, no differences were found regarding maximum load or Young’s modulus between groups.

Conclusions

This study showed no signs of biomechanical impairment of porcine flexor tendons after the use of vancomycin wraps with concentration ranging from 1 to 10 mg/ml for 10 or 20 min at a time zero testing. Contamination with S. epidermidis was cleansed in 100% of tendons when using at least 5 mg/ml of vancomycin for 20 min.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Torres-Claramunt R, Pelfort X, Erquicia J, Gil-Gonzalez S, Gelber PE, Puig L, Monllau JC (2013) Knee joint infection after ACL reconstruction: prevalence, management and functional outcomes. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21:2844–2849

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Makhni EC, Steinhaus ME, Mehran N, Schulz BS, Ahmad CS (2015) Functional outcome and graft retention in patients with septic arthritis after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review. Arthroscopy 31:1392–1401

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Vertullo CJ, Quick M, Jones A, Grayson JE (2012) A surgical technique using presoaked vancomycin hamstring grafts to decrease the risk of infection after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 28:337–342

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Calvo R, Figueroa D, Anastasiadis Z, Vaisman A, Olid A, Gili F, Valderrama JJ, De La Fuente P (2014) Septic arthritis in ACL reconstruction surgery with hamstring autografts. Eleven years of experience. Knee 21:717–720

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Domnick C, Garcia P, Raschke MJ, Glasbrenner J, Lodde G, Fink C, Herbort M (2017) Trends and incidences of ligament-surgeries and osteotomies of the knee: an analysis of German inpatient records 2005–2013. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 137:989–995

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Shafizadeh S, Jaecker V, Otchwemah R, Banerjee M, Naendrup JH (2016) Current status of ACL reconstruction in Germany. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 136:593–603

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Saper M, Stephenson K, Heisey M (2014) Arthroscopic irrigation and debridement in the treatment of septic arthritis after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 30:747–754

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. McAllister DR, Parker RD, Cooper AE, Recht MP, Abate J (1999) Outcomes of postoperative septic arthritis after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 27:562–570

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Scully WF, Fisher SG, Parada SA, Arrington ED (2013) Septic arthritis following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comprehensive review of the literature. J Surg Orthop Adv 22:127–133

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Phegan M, Grayson JE, Vertullo CJ (2016) No infections in 1300 anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions with vancomycin pre-soaking of hamstring grafts. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 24:2729–2735

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Yazdi H, Moradi A, Herbort M (2014) The effect of gentamicin in irrigating solutions on articular infection prophylaxis during arthroscopic ACL reconstruction. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 134:257–261

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Maletis GB, Inacio MC, Reynolds S, Desmond JL, Maletis MM, Funahashi TT (2013) Incidence of postoperative anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction infections: graft choice makes a difference. Am J Sports Med 41:1780–1785

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Barker JU, Drakos MC, Maak TG, Warren RF, Williams RJ III, Allen AA (2010) Effect of graft selection on the incidence of postoperative infection in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 38:281–286

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Domnick C, Wieskotter B, Raschke MJ, Schulze M, Kronenberg D, Wefelmeier M, Langer MF, Herbort M (2016) Evaluation of biomechanical properties: are porcine flexor tendons and bovine extensor tendons eligible surrogates for human tendons in in vitro studies? Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 136:1465–1471

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Grayson JE, Grant GD, Dukie S, Vertullo CJ (2011) The in vitro elution characteristics of vancomycin from tendons. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469:2948–2952

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Eriksson K, Karlsson J (2016) Local vancomycin in ACL reconstruction: a modern rationale (2016) for morbidity prevention and patient safety. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 24:2721–2723

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Dogan M, Isyar M, Yilmaz I, Bilir B, Sirin DY, Cakmak S, Mahirogullari M (2016) Are the leading drugs against Staphylococcus aureus really toxic to cartilage? J Infect Public Health 9:251–258

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Edin ML, Miclau T, Lester GE, Lindsey RW, Dahners LE (1996) Effect of cefazolin and vancomycin on osteoblasts in vitro. Clin Orthop Relat Res 333:245–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Antoci V Jr, Adams CS, Hickok NJ, Shapiro IM, Parvizi J (2007) Antibiotics for local delivery systems cause skeletal cell toxicity in vitro. Clin Orthop Relat Res 462:200–206

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

There is no funding source.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karl-Friedrich Schüttler.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schüttler, KF., Scharm, A., Stein, T. et al. Biomechanical and microbiological effects of local vancomycin in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction: a porcine tendon model. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 139, 73–78 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-018-3006-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-018-3006-x

Keywords

Navigation