Skip to main content
Log in

Stability of supramalleolar osteotomies using different implants in a sawbone model

  • Orthopaedic Surgery
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

With ankle arthritis often affecting young patients, joint-sparing treatments instead of total joint replacement should be considered. Only a few implants were specially developed for supramalleolar osteotomies (SMOT). This study was performed to analyse the stability of different implants and their appropriateness for SMOT.

Methods

Twenty-five bone models (Sawbone Europe, Malmö, Sweden) were used for biomechanical testing. SMOT were performed as a uniplanar osteotomy, leaving 5 mm of lateral bone intact with a standardized gap of 8 mm. Five different plates commonly used for SMOT were assessed. For axial stability, the constructs were tested during 100 cycles for each load (150N and 800N) at a rate of 0.5 Hz. For rotational stability, each construct was subject to 100 cycles of 5 Nm torque at a rate of 0.25 Hz, performing three runs with an axial preload of 0N, 150N, or 800N. Ultimate axial load was performed for one-half and ultimate rotational load was performed for the other half of the constructs. In addition, the stiffness of the different constructs after failure was tested.

Results

All constructs showed high stability and could be tested until maximum cyclic load. There was no significant difference between the five plates, neither for stiffness (axial or rotational) nor for failure load (axial or rotational). One plate indicated superiority in axial failure testing without any significant difference.

Conclusion

All implants could be tested until maximum load. The intact hinge apparently provides enough support to compensate for lower moment of inertia of some plates.

Level of evidence

Not applicable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Agneskirchner JD, Freiling D, Hurschler C, Lobenhoffer P (2006) Primary stability of four different implants for opening wedge high tibial osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 14(3):291–300

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Brinkman JM, Hurschler C, Agneskirchner JD, Freiling D, van Heerwaarden RJ (2011) Axial and torsional stability of supracondylar femur osteotomies: biomechanical comparison of the stability of five different plate and osteotomy configurations. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19(4):579–587

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Brinkman JM, Hurschler C, Staubli AE, van Heerwaarden RJ (2011) Axial and torsional stability of an improved single-plane and a new bi-plane osteotomy technique for supracondylar femur osteotomies. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19(7):1090–1098

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Buda R, Castagnini F, Cavallo M, Ramponi L, Vannini F, Giannini S (2016) “One-step” bone marrow-derived cells transplantation and joint debridement for osteochondral lesions of the talus in ankle osteoarthritis: clinical and radiological outcomes at 36 months. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 136(1):107–116

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Coventry MB, Ilstrup DM, Wallrichs SL (1993) Proximal tibial osteotomy. A critical long-term study of eighty-seven cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am 75(2):196–201

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Cristofolini L, Viceconti M (2000) Mechanical validation of whole bone composite tibia models. J Biomech 33(3):279–288

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Heiner AD, Brown TD (2001) Structural properties of a new design of composite replicate femurs and tibias. J Biomech 34(6):773–781

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Korner D, Gueorguiev B, Niemeyer P et al (2017) Parameters influencing complaints and joint function in patients with osteochondral lesions of the ankle-an investigation based on data from the German Cartilage Registry (KnorpelRegister DGOU). Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 137(3):367–373

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Korovessis P, Katsoudas G, Salonikides P, Stamatakis M, Baikousis A (1999) Medium- and long-term results of high tibial osteotomy for varus gonarthrosis in an agricultural population. Orthopedics 22(8):729–736

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Krahenbuhl N, Zwicky L, Bolliger L, Schadelin S, Hintermann B, Knupp M (2017) Mid- to long-term results of supramalleolar osteotomy. Foot Ankle Int 38(2):124–132

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lee OS, Ahn S, Lee YS (2017) Effect and safety of early weight-bearing on the outcome after open-wedge high tibial osteotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 137(7):903–911

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Miller BS, Dorsey WO, Bryant CR, Austin JC (2005) The effect of lateral cortex disruption and repair on the stability of the medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy. Am J Sports Med 33(10):1552–1557

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Nha KW, Lee SH, Rhyu IJ et al (2016) Safe zone for medial open-wedge supramalleolar osteotomy of the ankle: a cadaveric study. Foot Ankle Int 37(1):102–108

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Pagenstert GI, Hintermann B, Barg A, Leumann A, Valderrabano V (2007) Realignment surgery as alternative treatment of varus and valgus ankle osteoarthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 462:156–168

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Pape D, Lorbach O, Schmitz C et al. (2010) Effect of a biplanar osteotomy on primary stability following high tibial osteotomy: a biomechanical cadaver study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Off J ESSKA 18(2):204–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Schmid T, Zurbriggen S, Zderic I, Gueorguiev B, Weber M, Krause FG (2013) Ankle joint pressure changes in a pes cavovarus model: supramalleolar valgus osteotomy versus lateralizing calcaneal osteotomy. Foot Ankle Int 34(9):1190–1197

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Spahn G, Muckley T, Kahl E, Hofmann GO (2006) Biomechanical investigation of different internal fixations in medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy. Clin Biomech (Bristol Avon) 21(3):272–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Stamatis ED, Cooper PS, Myerson MS (2003) Supramalleolar osteotomy for the treatment of distal tibial angular deformities and arthritis of the ankle joint. Foot Ankle Int 24(10):754–764

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Takakura Y, Takaoka T, Tanaka Y, Yajima H, Tamai S (1998) Results of opening-wedge osteotomy for the treatment of a post-traumatic varus deformity of the ankle. J Bone Joint Surg Am 80(2):213–218

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Valderrabano V, Horisberger M, Russell I, Dougall H, Hintermann B (2009) Etiology of ankle osteoarthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467(7):1800–1806

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

All plates were sponsored by the manufacturers.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christian Plaass.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ettinger, S., Schwarze, M., Yao, D. et al. Stability of supramalleolar osteotomies using different implants in a sawbone model. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 138, 1359–1363 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-018-2981-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-018-2981-2

Keywords

Navigation