Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Patient characteristics and outcomes of a hip fracture and concomitant fracture compared with hip fracture alone: results from a United Kingdom teaching hospital

  • Orthopaedic Surgery
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

A proportion of patients sustaining hip fractures present with a concomitant fracture. We aimed to evaluate the relationship between patient characteristics and clinical outcomes, in those with a hip and concomitant fracture compared with those sustaining a hip fracture alone from a clinical service registry.

Method

Cross-sectional study using data obtained from a clinical service registry (Nottingham Hip Fracture Database) on patients aged 50 and above who suffered a hip fracture between 1/1/2003 and 31/12/2012. Data was collected on patient demographics, fracture information and healthcare outcomes.

Results

7338 patients of which 75 % were female (mean age 82 (SD 9.4), had a hip fracture with 334 (4.6 %) patients having a concomitant fracture. The majority (58 %) were distal radius or proximal humeral fractures. Only females (p = 0.002), those taking three or fewer medications (p = 0.018) and those on long term steroids (p = 0.048) were more likely to suffer a concomitant fracture. There was no difference in mortality, rates of postoperative complication, intensive care unit or care home admission between both groups. Patients with a concomitant fracture have a 16 % longer average length of stay in hospital (mean difference 1.16; 95 % CI 1.07–1.25, p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Patients with concomitant fractures have similar patient characteristics, except gender, polypharmacy and long term steroid use; and outcomes to those presenting with hip fracture alone, except a longer average inpatient stay.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Smith P, Ariti C, Bardsley. (2013) Focus on hip fracture. Trends in emergency admissions for fractured neck of femur, 2001–2011. Quality Watch

  2. Braithwaite RS, Col NF, Wong JB (2003) Estimating hip fracture morbidity, mortality and costs. J Am Geriatr Soc 51:364–370

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Roche JJW, Wenn RT, Sahota O, Moran CG (2005) Effect of comorbidities and postoperative complications on mortality after hip fracture in elderly people: prospective observational cohort study. Brit Med J. 331:1374

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Stevenson MD, Davis SE, Kanis JA (2006) The hospitalisation costs and out-patient costs of fragility fractures. Women’s Health Med 3:149–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hannan EL, Magaziner J, Wang JJ, Eastwood EA, Silberzweig SB, Gilbert M, Morrison RS, McLaughlin MA, Orosz GM, Siu AL (2001) Mortality and locomotion 6 months after hospitalization for hip fracture. J Amer Med Assoc 285:2736–2742

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Moppett IK, Parker M, Griffiths R, Bowers T, White SM, Moran CG (2012) Nottingham Hip Fracture Score: longitudinal and multi-centre assessment. Br J Anaesth 109:546–550

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (2011) Hip fracture: The management of hip fracture in adults. Clinical Guideline 124. London:NICE

  8. Buecking B, Wack C, Oberkircher L, Ruchholtz S, Eschbach D (2012) Do concomitant fractures with hip fractures influence complication rate and functional outcome? Clin Orthop Relat Res 470:3596–3606

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Mulhall KJ, Ahmed A, Khan Y, Masterson E (2002) Simultaneous hip and upper limb fracture in the elderly: incidence, features and management considerations. Injury 33:29–31

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Tow BP, Chua BS, Fook-Chong S, Howe TS (2009) Concurrent fractures of the hip and wrist: a matched analysis of elderly patients Injury 40:385–387

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Di Monaco M, Vallero F, Di Monaco R, Mautino F, Cavanna A (2003) Functional recovery after concomitant fractures of both hip and upper limb in elderly people. J Rehabil Med 35:195–197

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Fiona Millinship for her help in generating the database needed to conduct the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Terence Ong.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare: no support from any organisation for the submitted work; no financial relationships with any organisations that might have an interest in the submitted work; no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work. All authors have signed the authorship declaration form. No external funding was obtained for the production of this study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ong, T., Anand, V., Tan, W. et al. Patient characteristics and outcomes of a hip fracture and concomitant fracture compared with hip fracture alone: results from a United Kingdom teaching hospital. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 136, 463–467 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-016-2422-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-016-2422-z

Keywords

Navigation