Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Relationship between femoral tunnel location and graft bending angle in outside-in and transportal technique for ACL double bundle reconstruction in 3D-CT study

  • Arthroscopy and Sports Medicine
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

In anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, sharp angulation of the graft at tunnel aperture increases local strain to the graft. The purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship between femoral tunnel location and femoral graft bending angle after ACL double bundle reconstruction (ACL-DBR) with two different drilling techniques.

Materials and methods

In ACL-DBR, femoral tunnel was created by two techniques; outside-in technique (26 patients, group A) and transportal technique (25 patients, group B). CT scan was taken at 1 week postoperatively. The position of femoral tunnel exit on the lateral femoral cortex, and intra-articular femoral and tibial tunnel aperture of the anteromedial bundle (AMB) and postero-lateral bundle (PLB) was measured using a rectangular frame on three-dimensional CT images. Femoral graft bending angle was measured using two-dimensional CT images.

Results

Femoral tunnel exits of AMB and PLB in group A were significantly anterior and proximal than those in group B (p < 0.05), while there was no significant difference in intra-articular femoral and tibial tunnel apertures between group A and B. A mean femoral graft bending angle of AMB was 80.3° in group A and 69.2 degrees in group B, respectively (p < 0.05). A mean femoral graft bending angle of PLB was 66.3° in group A and 64.6° in group B, respectively. In both groups, a significant (p < 0.05) correlation (r < −0.4) was observed between the position of the femoral tunnel exit (anterior–posterior ratio from femoral anterior border line) and the femoral graft bending angle in AMB.

Conclusions

Since the femoral tunnel exit in outside-in technique was located more anterior and proximal, femoral graft bending angle of AMB in outside-in technique was greater than that in transportal technique. Anterior position of the femoral tunnel exit in AMB increased femoral graft bending angle in outside-in and transportal techniques.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alavekios D, Peterson A, Patton J, McGarry MH, Lee TQ (2014) The relation between knee flexion angle and anterior cruciate ligament femoral tunnel characteristics: a cadaveric study comparing a standard and a far anteromedial portal. Arthroscopy 30:1468–1474

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Basdekis G, Abisafi C, Christel P (2008) Influence of knee flexion angle on femoral tunnel characteristics when drilled through the anteromedial portal during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 24:459–464

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bernard M, Hertel P, Hornung H, Cierpinski T (1997) Femoral insertion of the ACL. Radiographic quadrant method. Am J Knee Surg 10:14–21

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chhabra A, Kline AJ, Nilles KM, Harner CD (2006) Tunnel expansion after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with autogenous hamstrings: a comparison of the medial portal and transtibial techniques. Arthroscopy 22:1107–1112

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Edwards A, Bull AM, Amis AA (2008) The attachments of the anteromedial and posterolateral fibre bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament. Part 2: femoral attachment. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 16:29–36

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Fink C, Zapp M, Benedetto KP, Hackl W, Hoser C, Rieger M (2001) Tibial tunnel enlargement following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with patellar tendon autograft. Arthroscopy 17:138–143

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gadikota HR, Sim JA, Hosseini A, Gill TJ, Li G (2012) The relationship between femoral tunnels created by the transtibial, anteromedial portal, and outside-in techniques and the anterior cruciate ligament footprint. Am J Sports Med 40:882–888

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Golish SR, Baumfeld JA, Schoderbek RJ, Miller MD (2007) The effect of femoral tunnel starting position on tunnel length in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a cadaveric study. Arthroscopy 23:1187–1192

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hensler D, Working ZM, Illingworth KD, Thorhauer ED, Tashman S, Fu FH (2011) Medial portal drilling: effects on the femoral tunnel aperture morphology during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93:2063–2071

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hwang DH, Shetty GM, Kim JI, Kwon JH, Song JK, Muñoz M, Lee JS, Nha KW (2013) Does press-fit technique reduce tunnel volume enlargement after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with autologous hamstring tendons? A prospective randomized computed tomography study. Arthroscopy 29:83–88

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Iwahashi T, Shino K, Nakata K, Otsubo H, Suzuki T, Amano H, Nakamura N (2010) Direct anterior cruciate ligament insertion to the femur assessed by histology and 3-dimensional volume-rendered computed tomography. Arthroscopy 26:S13–S20

  12. Kim JG, Wang JH, Lim HC, Ahn JH (2012) Femoral graft bending angle and femoral tunnel geometry of transportal and outside-in techniques in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an in vivo 3-dimensional computed tomography analysis. Arthroscopy 28:1682–1694

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lertwanich P, Martins CA, Asai S, Ingham SJ, Smolinski P, Fu FH (2011) Anterior cruciate ligament tunnel position measurement reliability on 3-dimensional reconstructed computed tomography. Arthroscopy 27:391–398

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lubowitz JH (2009) Anteromedial portal technique for the anterior cruciate ligament femoral socket: pitfalls and solutions. Arthroscopy 25:95–101

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lubowitz JH, Konicek J (2010) Anterior cruciate ligament femoral tunnel length: cadaveric analysis comparing anteromedial portal versus outside-in technique. Arthroscopy 26:1357–1362

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Nishimoto K, Kuroda R, Mizuno K, Hoshino Y, Nagamune K, Kubo S, Yagi M, Yamaguchi M, Yoshiya S, Kurosaka M (2009) Analysis of the graft bending angle at the femoral tunnel aperture in anatomic double bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison of the transtibial and the far anteromedial portal technique. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17:270–276

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Panni AS, Milano G, Tartarone M, Demontis A, Fabbriciani C (2001) Clinical and radiographic results of ACL reconstruction: a 5- to 7-year follow-up study of outside-in versus inside-out reconstruction techniques. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 9:77–85

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Park JS, Park JH, Wang JH, Oh CH, Hwang MH, Lee SH, Kim JG (2014) Comparison of Femoral Tunnel Geometry, Using In Vivo 3-Dimensional Computed Tomography, During Transportal and Outside-In Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Techniques Arthroscopy doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2014.07.023. Epub ahead of print

  19. Sasaki N, Ishibashi Y, Tsuda E, Yamamoto Y, Maeda S, Mizukami H, Toh S, Yagihashi S, Tonosaki Y (2012) The femoral insertion of the anterior cruciate ligament: discrepancy between macroscopic and histological observations. Arthroscopy 28:1135–1146

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Schreiber VM, van Eck CF, Fu FH (2010) Anatomic Double-bundle ACL Reconstruction. Sports Med Arthrosc 18:27–32

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Segawa H, Omori G, Tomita S, Koga Y (2001) Bone tunnel enlargement after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring tendons. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 9:206–210

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Segawa H, Koga Y, Omori G, Sakamoto M, Hara T (2005) Contact pressure in anterior cruciate ligament bone tunnels: comparison of endoscopic and two-incision technique. Arthroscopy 21:439–444

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Shin YS, Ro KH, Jeon JH, Lee DH (2014) Graft-bending angle and femoral tunnel length after single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: comparison of the transtibial, anteromedial portal and outside-in techniques. Bone Joint J 96-B:743–751

  24. Smigielski R, Zdanowicz U, Drwięga M, Ciszek B, Ciszkowska-Łysoń B, Siebold R (2014) Ribbon like appearance of the midsubstance fibres of the anterior cruciate ligament close to its femoral insertion site: a cadaveric study including 111 knees. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc doi: 10.1007/s00167-014-3146-7. Epub ahead of print

  25. Steiner ME (2009) Independent drilling of tibial and femoral tunnels in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Knee Surg 22:171–176

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Udagawa K, Niki Y, Enomoto H, Toyama Y, Suda Y (2014) Factors influencing graft impingement on the wall of the intercondylar notch after anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 42:2219–2225

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Wang JH, Kim JG, Lee do K, Lim HC, Ahn JH (2012) Comparison of femoral graft bending angle and tunnel length between transtibial technique and transportal technique in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20:1584–1593

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Webster KE, Feller JA, Hameister KA (2001) Bone tunnel enlargement following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a randomised comparison of hamstring and patellar tendon grafts with 2-year follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 9:86–91

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shimada Hospital, 100-1 Kashiyama, Habikino, 583-0875, Japan

    Tomohiro Tomihara, Masatoshi Taniuchi & Nagakazu Shimada

  2. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-4-3 Asahi-machi, Abeno-ku, Osaka, 545-8585, Japan

    Yusuke Hashimoto

Authors
  1. Tomohiro Tomihara
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yusuke Hashimoto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Masatoshi Taniuchi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Nagakazu Shimada
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tomohiro Tomihara.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tomihara, T., Hashimoto, Y., Taniuchi, M. et al. Relationship between femoral tunnel location and graft bending angle in outside-in and transportal technique for ACL double bundle reconstruction in 3D-CT study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 135, 839–846 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-015-2226-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-015-2226-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation