Abstract
Background
It is imperative to understand the most common failure modes of total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) to appropriately allocate the resources, healthcare costs, enhancing surgical treatment methods, and improve design and longevity of the implant. The objective of this study was to investigate the primary mode or modes of failure (Loose talar component, loose tibial component, dislocation, instability, misalignment, deep infection, Fracture (near implant), Pain, defect polyethylene (PE), other, and missing information) of TAA implants, so these failure mode/modes can be targeted for future improvement.
Methods
The Norwegian Total Hip Arthroplasty Register 2008 was chosen as the primary source of data since the register have been in existence for 20 years and also gives more specific failure modes than other registries. Tukey–Kramer method was applied to Norwegian Arthroplasty Register.
Results
After the application of the Tukey–Kramer method, it is evident that there is no significant difference between any of the failure modes that are pertinent to the ankle. However, there is significant evidence that the number of ankle arthroplasties are increasing with time.
Conclusions
Since there is no statistical evidence showing which failure mode contributes most to revision surgeries, it is concluded that more information/data is needed to further investigate failure modes in ankle arthroplasties. Since the numbers of such surgeries are increasing, sufficient data should become available in time.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Jensen NC, Linde F (2008) Long-term follow-up on 33 TPR ankle joint replacements in 26 patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Foot Ankle Surg. doi:10.1016/j.fas.2008.08.009
Michael JM, Golshani A, Gargac S, Goswami T (2008) Biomechanics of the ankle joint and clinical outcomes of total ankle replacement. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 1(4):276–294
Cerrato R, Myerson MS (2008) Total ankle replacement: the agility LP prothesis. Foot Ankle Clin 13(3):485–494
Henne TD, Anderson JG (2002) Total ankle arthroplasty: a historical perspective. Foot Ankle Clin 7(4):695–702
Jackson MP, Singh D (2003) Total ankle replacement. Current Orthopaedics 17:292–298
Kitaoka HB, Patzer GL (1996) Clinical results of the mayo total ankle arthroplasty. J Bone Jt Surg 78:1658–1664
Sadoghi P, Schröder C, Fottner A, Steinbrück A, Betz O, Müller PE, Jansson V, Hölzer A (2012) Application and survival curve of total hip arthroplasties: a systematic comparative analysis using worldwide hip arthroplasty registers. Int Orthop 36(11):2197–2203
Myerson MS, Miller SD (2002) Salvage after complications of total ankle arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Clin 7:191–206
Anderson T, Montgomery F, Carlsson A (2003) Uncemented STAR total ankle prostheses: three to eight year follow-up of fifty-one consecutive ankles. J Bone Jt Surg Am 85(7):1321–1329
Harris NJ, Brooke BT, Sturdee S (2009) A wear debris cyst following S.T.A.R. total ankle replacement—surgical management. Foot Ankle Surg 15:43–45
Murnaghan JM, Warnock DS, Henderson SA (2005) Total ankle replacement. Early experiences with STAR prosthesis. Ulster Med J 74:9–13
Kopp FJ, Patel MM, Deland JT, O’Malley MJ (2006) Total ankle arthroplasty with the agility prosthesis: clinical and radiographic evaluation. Foot Ankle Int 27:97–103
Thordarson DB, Ahlmann E, Shepherd LE et al (2000) Sepsis and osteomyelitis about the ankle joint. Foot Ankle Clin 5:913–928
Furnes O, Havelin LI, Espehaug B, Fenstad AM, Steindal K (2008) The Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. Report 2008. ISBN-0809-9405. ISBN- 978-82-91847-13-9. Bergen, Norway: 2008. pp 59–62
Henricson A, Skoog A, Carlsson A (2007) The Swedish ankle arthroplasty register: an analysis of 531 arthroplasties between 1993 and 2005. Acta Orthop 78(5):569–574
Sadoghi P, Liebensteiner M, Agreiter M, Leithner A, Böhler N, Labek G (2013) Revision surgery after total joint arthroplasty: a complication-based analysis using worldwide arthroplasty registers. J Arthroplasty 28(8):1329–1332
Montgomery DC (2008) Design and Analysis of Experiments. Wiley. 7th ed. 2008
Conti SF, Wong YS (2001) Complications of total ankle replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 391:105–114
Bullens P, de Waal Malefijt M, Louwerens JW (2010) Conversion of failed ankle arthroplasty to an arthrodesis. Technique using an arthrodesis nail and a cage filled with morsellized bone graft. Foot Ankle Surg 16(2):101–104
Reggiani B, Leardini A, Corazza F, Taylor M (2006) Finite element analysis of a total ankle replacement during the stance phase of gait. J Biomech 39:1435–1443
Vielgut I, Kastner N, Pichler K, Holzer L, Glehr M, Gruber G, Leithner A, Labek G, Sadoghi P (2013) Application and surgical technique of total knee arthroplasties: a systematic comparative analysis using worldwide registers. Int Orthop 28(8):1329–1332
Myerson MS, Mroczek K (2003) Perioperative complications of total ankle arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Int 24(1):17–21
Groth HE, Fitch HF (1987) Salvage procedures for complications of total ankle arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 224:244–250
Muir DC, Amendola A, Saltzman CL (2002) Long-term outcome of ankle arthrodesis. Foot Ankle Clin 7:703–708
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sadoghi, P., Roush, G., Kastner, N. et al. Failure modes for total ankle arthroplasty: a statistical analysis of the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 134, 1361–1368 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-014-2067-8
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-014-2067-8