Skip to main content
Log in

Failure modes for total ankle arthroplasty: a statistical analysis of the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register

  • Orthopaedic Surgery
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

It is imperative to understand the most common failure modes of total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) to appropriately allocate the resources, healthcare costs, enhancing surgical treatment methods, and improve design and longevity of the implant. The objective of this study was to investigate the primary mode or modes of failure (Loose talar component, loose tibial component, dislocation, instability, misalignment, deep infection, Fracture (near implant), Pain, defect polyethylene (PE), other, and missing information) of TAA implants, so these failure mode/modes can be targeted for future improvement.

Methods

The Norwegian Total Hip Arthroplasty Register 2008 was chosen as the primary source of data since the register have been in existence for 20 years and also gives more specific failure modes than other registries. Tukey–Kramer method was applied to Norwegian Arthroplasty Register.

Results

After the application of the Tukey–Kramer method, it is evident that there is no significant difference between any of the failure modes that are pertinent to the ankle. However, there is significant evidence that the number of ankle arthroplasties are increasing with time.

Conclusions

Since there is no statistical evidence showing which failure mode contributes most to revision surgeries, it is concluded that more information/data is needed to further investigate failure modes in ankle arthroplasties. Since the numbers of such surgeries are increasing, sufficient data should become available in time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jensen NC, Linde F (2008) Long-term follow-up on 33 TPR ankle joint replacements in 26 patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Foot Ankle Surg. doi:10.1016/j.fas.2008.08.009

    Google Scholar 

  2. Michael JM, Golshani A, Gargac S, Goswami T (2008) Biomechanics of the ankle joint and clinical outcomes of total ankle replacement. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 1(4):276–294

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cerrato R, Myerson MS (2008) Total ankle replacement: the agility LP prothesis. Foot Ankle Clin 13(3):485–494

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Henne TD, Anderson JG (2002) Total ankle arthroplasty: a historical perspective. Foot Ankle Clin 7(4):695–702

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Jackson MP, Singh D (2003) Total ankle replacement. Current Orthopaedics 17:292–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kitaoka HB, Patzer GL (1996) Clinical results of the mayo total ankle arthroplasty. J Bone Jt Surg 78:1658–1664

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Sadoghi P, Schröder C, Fottner A, Steinbrück A, Betz O, Müller PE, Jansson V, Hölzer A (2012) Application and survival curve of total hip arthroplasties: a systematic comparative analysis using worldwide hip arthroplasty registers. Int Orthop 36(11):2197–2203

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Myerson MS, Miller SD (2002) Salvage after complications of total ankle arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Clin 7:191–206

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Anderson T, Montgomery F, Carlsson A (2003) Uncemented STAR total ankle prostheses: three to eight year follow-up of fifty-one consecutive ankles. J Bone Jt Surg Am 85(7):1321–1329

    Google Scholar 

  10. Harris NJ, Brooke BT, Sturdee S (2009) A wear debris cyst following S.T.A.R. total ankle replacement—surgical management. Foot Ankle Surg 15:43–45

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Murnaghan JM, Warnock DS, Henderson SA (2005) Total ankle replacement. Early experiences with STAR prosthesis. Ulster Med J 74:9–13

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Kopp FJ, Patel MM, Deland JT, O’Malley MJ (2006) Total ankle arthroplasty with the agility prosthesis: clinical and radiographic evaluation. Foot Ankle Int 27:97–103

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Thordarson DB, Ahlmann E, Shepherd LE et al (2000) Sepsis and osteomyelitis about the ankle joint. Foot Ankle Clin 5:913–928

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Furnes O, Havelin LI, Espehaug B, Fenstad AM, Steindal K (2008) The Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. Report 2008. ISBN-0809-9405. ISBN- 978-82-91847-13-9. Bergen, Norway: 2008. pp 59–62

  15. Henricson A, Skoog A, Carlsson A (2007) The Swedish ankle arthroplasty register: an analysis of 531 arthroplasties between 1993 and 2005. Acta Orthop 78(5):569–574

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sadoghi P, Liebensteiner M, Agreiter M, Leithner A, Böhler N, Labek G (2013) Revision surgery after total joint arthroplasty: a complication-based analysis using worldwide arthroplasty registers. J Arthroplasty 28(8):1329–1332

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Montgomery DC (2008) Design and Analysis of Experiments. Wiley. 7th ed. 2008

  18. Conti SF, Wong YS (2001) Complications of total ankle replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 391:105–114

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bullens P, de Waal Malefijt M, Louwerens JW (2010) Conversion of failed ankle arthroplasty to an arthrodesis. Technique using an arthrodesis nail and a cage filled with morsellized bone graft. Foot Ankle Surg 16(2):101–104

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Reggiani B, Leardini A, Corazza F, Taylor M (2006) Finite element analysis of a total ankle replacement during the stance phase of gait. J Biomech 39:1435–1443

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Vielgut I, Kastner N, Pichler K, Holzer L, Glehr M, Gruber G, Leithner A, Labek G, Sadoghi P (2013) Application and surgical technique of total knee arthroplasties: a systematic comparative analysis using worldwide registers. Int Orthop 28(8):1329–1332

    Google Scholar 

  22. Myerson MS, Mroczek K (2003) Perioperative complications of total ankle arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Int 24(1):17–21

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Groth HE, Fitch HF (1987) Salvage procedures for complications of total ankle arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 224:244–250

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Muir DC, Amendola A, Saltzman CL (2002) Long-term outcome of ankle arthrodesis. Foot Ankle Clin 7:703–708

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patrick Sadoghi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sadoghi, P., Roush, G., Kastner, N. et al. Failure modes for total ankle arthroplasty: a statistical analysis of the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 134, 1361–1368 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-014-2067-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-014-2067-8

Keywords

Navigation