Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Comparing approaches to expose type C fractures of the distal humerus for ORIF in elderly patients: six years clinical experience with both the triceps-sparing approach and olecranon osteotomy

  • Trauma Surgery
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Although open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) is a standard fracture treatment method, the optimal way to expose a fracture prior to ORIF is debated. We compared the effects of two exposure methods, the triceps-sparing approach and olecranon osteotomy, on the functional outcomes of ORIF-treated type C distal humerus fractures in elderly people.

Methods

From January 2006 to January 2011, 75 elderly patients with type C distal humerus fractures were treated with ORIF, and we retrospectively reviewed their medical records, radiographs, and follow-up charts to identify any complications. Patients’ Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) and range of motion were determined at their final clinic visit.

Results

Sixty-seven patients (89 %) attended the final visit. Of these patients, 36 received olecranon osteotomy and 31 received the triceps-sparing approach. For patients with type C1 and C2 fractures, we observed reductions in procedure times, blood loss, complication rates, and MEPS outcomes (all P < 0.01) with the triceps-sparing approach compared with olecranon osteotomy. Except for MEPS outcomes, all of these approach-related improvements were also statistically significantly for type C3 fractures (all P < 0.01). Overall, we did not observe any cases of fracture nonunion, implantation breakage or loosening, or elbow stiffening in our series.

Conclusions

In our study, we found better functional outcomes for type C1 and C2 distal humerus fractures that were exposed using the triceps-sparing approach rather than olecranon osteotomy. Even for the most complex type of fracture, C3 fractures, similar recoveries in elbow function were achieved using either approach.

Level of evidence

Level III.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zlotolow DA, Catalano LW 3rd, Barron OA, Glickel SZ (2006) Surgical exposures of the humerus. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 14:754–765

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bryan RS, Morrey BF (1982) Extensive posterior exposure of the elbow. A triceps-sparing approach. Clin Orthop Relat Res 166:188–192

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Erpelding JM, Mailander A, High R, Mormino MA, Fehringer EV (2012) Outcomes following distal humeral fracture fixation with an extensor mechanism-on approach. J Bone Jt Surg Am 94:548–553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen G, Liao Q, Luo W, Li K, Zhao Y, Zhong D (2011) Tricep-sparing versus olecranon osteotomy for ORIF: analysis of 67 cases of intercondylar fractures of the distal humerus. Injury 42:366–370

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Broberg MA, Morrey BF (1986) Results of delayed excision of the radial head after fracture. J Bone Jt Surg Am 68:669–674

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hastings H 2nd, Graham TJ (1994) The classification and treatment of heterotopic ossification about the elbow and forearm. Hand Clin 10:417–437

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Koh KH, Lim TK, Lee HI, Park MJ (2013) Surgical release of elbow stiffness after internal fixation of intercondylar fracture of the distal humerus. J Shoulder Elb Surg 22:268–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Nauth A, McKee MD, Ristevski B, Hall J, Schemitsch EH (2011) Distal humeral fractures in adults. J Bone Jt Surg Am 93:686–700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Frankle MA, Herscovici D Jr, DiPasquale TG, Vasey MB, Sanders RW (2003) A comparison of open reduction and internal fixation and primary total elbow arthroplasty in the treatment of intra-articular distal humerus fractures in women older than age 65. J Orthop Trauma 17:473–480

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Muller LP, Dietz SO, Rommens PM, Morrey BF (2003) Total elbow replacement as primary treatment for complex fractures of the distal osteopenic humerus. Eur J Trauma 29:63–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. McKee MD, Veillette CJ, Hall JA, Schemitsch EH, Wild LM, McCormack R et al (2009) A multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled trial of open reduction—internal fixation versus total elbow arthroplasty for displaced intra-articular distal humeral fractures in elderly patients. J Shoulder Elb Surg 18:3–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jost B, Adams RA, Morrey BF (2008) Management of acute distal humeral fractures in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. A case series. J Bone Jt Surg Am 90:2197–2205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Korner J, Lill H, Müller LP, Hessmann M, Kopf K, Goldhahn J et al (2005) Distal humerus fractures in elderly patients: results after open reduction and internal fixation. Osteoporos Int 16(Suppl 2):S73–S79

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wagner M (2003) General principles for the clinical use of the LCP. Injury 34(Suppl 2):B31–B42

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Korner J, Lill H, Muller LP, Rommens PM, Schneider E, Linke B (2003) The LCP concept in the operative treatment of distal humerus fractures: biological, biomechanical and surgical aspects. Injury 34:B20–B30

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Soon JL, Chan BK, Low CO (2004) Surgical fixation of intra-articular fractures of the distal humerus in adults. Injury 35:44–54

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Shin SJ, Sohn HS, Do NH (2010) A clinical comparison of two different double plating methods for intraarticular distal humerus fractures. J Shoulder Elb Surg 19:2–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kaiser T, Brunner A, Hohendorff B, Ulmar B, Babst R (2011) Treatment of supra- and intra-articular fractures of the distal humerus with the LCP Distal Humerus Plate: a 2-year follow-up. J Shoulder Elb Surg 20:206–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ljungquist KL, Beran MC, Awan H (2012) Effects of surgical approach on functional outcomes of open reduction and internal fixation of intra-articular distal humeral fractures: a systematic review. J Shoulder Elb Surg 21:126–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Tak SR, Dar GN, Halwai MA, Kangoo KA, Mir BA (2009) Outcome of olecranon osteotomy in the trans-olecranon approach of intra-articular fractures of the distal humerus. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg 15:565–570

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Schmidt-Horlohé K, Wilde P, Bonk A, Becker L, Hoffmann R (2012) One-third tubular-hook-plate osteosynthesis for olecranon osteotomies in distal humerus type-C fractures: a preliminary report of results and complications. Injury 43:295–300

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Aktekin CN, Toprak A, Ozturk AM, Altay M, Ozkurt B, Tabak AY (2008) Open reduction via posterior triceps sparing approach in comparison with closed treatment of posteromedial displaced Gartland type III supracondylar humerus fractures. J Pediatr Orthop B 17:171–178

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Wilkinson JM, Stanley D (2001) Posterior surgical approaches to the elbow: a comparative anatomic study. J Shoulder Elb Surg 10:380–382

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None declared.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Orthopaedic Department, Shanghai Jiaotong University Affiliated No 6th People’s Hospital, 600 Yishan Road, Shanghai, 200233, People’s Republic of China

    Chi Zhang, Biao Zhong & Cong-feng Luo

Authors
  1. Chi Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Biao Zhong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Cong-feng Luo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Biao Zhong.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, C., Zhong, B. & Luo, Cf. Comparing approaches to expose type C fractures of the distal humerus for ORIF in elderly patients: six years clinical experience with both the triceps-sparing approach and olecranon osteotomy. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 134, 803–811 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-014-1983-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-014-1983-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation