Skip to main content
Log in

Improved method for planning intramedullary guiding rod entry point in total knee arthroplasty

  • Knee Arthroplasty
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

To study the accuracy of using the deepest point of the intercondylar notch (DPIN) as a reference point for femoral intramedullary (IM) guiding rod entrance in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with 3-D reconstruction in Chinese subjects.

Methods

A total of 50 normal femurs in 25 Chinese subjects (mean age 25.6 ± 2.9 years; range 18–29 years) were chosen from the lower extremities computed tomography digital imaging and communications in medicine (DICOM) database for this study. The DICOM data were imported into Mimics 10.0 software. A cylinder (radius = 4 mm; length = 20 cm) was used to simulate ideal insertion of a IM guiding rod into the femoral canal. DPIN was taken as a reference point for calculating the relative position of the rod’s entry point.

Results

The mean rod entry point position in the coronal plane was 2.94 ± 1.12 mm (range 0.79–4.91 mm) medial and 6.01 ± 2.09 mm (range 2.49–9.51 mm) anterior to the DPIN, with no significant difference between sides. All potential angle errors were below 2°.

Conclusion

The results of this study show that the DPIN can serve as a reference for surgeons using an IM guide system in TKA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nouta KA, Pijls BG, Nelissen RGHH (2012) All-polyethylene tibial components in TKA in rheumatoid arthritis: a 25-year follow-up study. Int Orthop 36:565

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhang HY, Blunt L, Jiang XQ et al (2011) The significance of the micropores at the stem-cement interface in total hip replacement. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 22:845

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. O’Connor MI (2011) Implant survival, knee function, and pain relief after TKA: are there differences between men and women? Clin Orthop Relat Res 469:1846

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lombardi AV Jr, Berend KR et al (2011) Neutral mechanical alignment: a requirement for successful TKA: affirms. Orthopedics 34:691

    Google Scholar 

  5. Zhang HY, Brown L, Blunt L et al (2011) The contribution of the micropores in bone cement surface to generation of femoral stem wear in total hip replacement. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 44:1476

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Nuno-Siebrecht N, Tanzer M, Bobyn JD (2000) Potential errors in axial alignment using intramedullary instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 15:228

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Jeffery JA (1999) Accuracy of intramedullary femoral alignment in total knee replacement: intraoperative assessment of alignment rod position. Knee 6:211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Reed SC, Gollish J (1997) The accuracy of femoral intramedullary guides in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 12:677

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Novotny J, Gonzalez MH, Amirouche FM et al (2001) Geometric analysis of potential error in using femoral intramedullary guides in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 16:641

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kim JG, Kasat NS, Bae JH et al (2012) The radiological parameters correlated with the alignment of the femoral component after Oxford phase 3 unicompartmental knee replacement. J Bone Jt Surg Br 94:1499

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Johnson DR, Dennis DA, Kindsfater KA et al (2013) Evaluation of total knee arthroplasty performed with and without computer navigation: a bilateral total knee arthroplasty study. J Arthroplasty 28:455–458

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ma B, Long W, Rudan JF et al (2006) Three-dimensional analysis of alignment error in using femoral intramedullary guides in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 21:271

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Arima J, Whiteside LA, McCarthy DS et al (1995) Femoral rotational alignment, based on the anteroposterior axis, in total knee arthroplasty in a valgus knee: a technical note. J Bone Jt Surg Am 77:1331

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1:307

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Laskin RS (1984) Alignment of total knee components. Orthopedics 7:62

    Google Scholar 

  16. Laskin RS (1986) RMC total knee replacement: a review of 166 cases. J Arthroplasty 1:11

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Meding JB, Berend ME, Ritter MA et al (2011) Intramedullary vs extramedullary femoral alignment guides: a 15-year follow-up of survivorship. J Arthroplasty 26:591

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Jung W, Chun C, Lee J et al (2013) The accuracy of the extramedullary and intramedullary femoral alignment system in total knee arthroplasty for varus osteoarthritic knee. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21:629

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ng VY, DeClaire JH, Berend KR et al (2012) Improved accuracy of alignment with patient-specific positioning guides compared with manual instrumentation in TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470:99

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Jiang CC, Insall JN (1989) Effect of rotation on the axial alignment of the femur: pitfalls in the use of femoral intramedullary guides in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 248:50

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Tang WM, Chiu KY, Kwan MF et al (2005) Sagittal bowing of the distal femur in Chinese patients who require total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Res 23:41

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Wangroongsub Y, Cherdtaweesup S (2009) Proper entry point for femoral intramedullary guide in total knee arthroplasty. J Med Assoc Thai 92:S1

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Insall JN, Easley ME (2001) Surgical techniques and instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty. In: Insall JN, Scott WN (eds) Surgery of the Knee, 3rd edn. Churchill Livingston, Philadelphia, p 1578

    Google Scholar 

  24. Oswald MH, Jakob RP, Schneider E et al (1993) Radiological analysis of normal axial alignment of femur and tibia in view of total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 8:419

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Aslam N, Lo S, Nagarajah K, Pasapula C, Akmal M (2004) Reliability of preoperative templating in total knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Belg 70:560–564

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Norman Bethune Program of Jilin University (2012216) and Science and Technology Development Program of Jilin Province (Grant No. 20100750). We acknowledge Joseph Lipman of the Department of Biomechanics at the Hospital for Special Surgery in New York, NY, USA for his suggestions on this manuscript.

Conflict of interest

We declare that we have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yanguo Qin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Xiao, J., Wang, C., Zhu, L. et al. Improved method for planning intramedullary guiding rod entry point in total knee arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 134, 693–698 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-014-1943-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-014-1943-6

Keywords

Navigation