Skip to main content
Log in

Osteitis pubis and adductor tendinopathy in athletes: a novel arthroscopic pubic symphysis curettage and adductor reattachment

  • Arthroscopy and Sports Medicine
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Various surgical treatment options have been described in athletes with degenerative osteitis pubis who fail to respond to conservative treatment modalities. Although adductor longus tendinopathy often represents an additional pain generator in chronic groin pain associated with osteitis pubis, this has not been acknowledged in the surgical literature, to our knowledge. We present the results of a novel surgical technique for combined degenerative lesions of the pubic symphysis joint and the adjacent adductor longus tendon in a series of athletes with osteitis pubis.

Methods

During 2009 and 2010, five competitive non-professional soccer players with considerable groin and pubic pain were referred to our clinic, after conservative therapy over a period of at least 12 months had failed. According to our clinical protocol for patients with groin pain, physical examination, pelvic radiographs and arthrography of the pubic symphysis to detect microlesions of the adjacent adductor longus tendons were performed. The patients diagnosed with degenerative osteitis pubis and concomitant lesion of the adductor longus origin were indicated for surgery. Surgery consisted of resection of the degenerative soft and bone tissue and subsequent reattachment with suture anchors. With regard to stability of the symphysis pubis, a two-portal arthroscopic curettage of the degenerative fibrocartilaginous disc tissue was performed. The patients were followed prospectively at medium term with assessment of general pain level (VAS score) and sport activity with pain (NIPPS score) pre- and postoperatively.

Results

All patients recovered to full activity sports after an average period of 14.4 weeks. VAS and NIPPS scores markedly improved and overall satisfaction with the postoperative result was high. One intraoperative bleeding occurred, needing revision surgery. None of the patients developed pubic instability due to pubic symphysis curettage in the sequel.

Conclusions

This novel surgical technique combines successfully stability-preserving arthroscopic pubic symphysis curettage with adductor debridement and reattachment in well-selected cases of athletes suffering from degenerative osteitis pubis and concomitant adductor pathology, being refractory to conservative treatment. Diligent preoperative evaluation of the specific pathology will lead to successful outcome.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Batt ME, McShane JM, Dillingham MF (1995) Osteitis pubis in collegiate football players. Med Sci Sports Exerc 27:629–633

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Williams PR, Thomas DP, Downes EM (2000) Osteitis pubis and instability of the pubic symphysis. When nonoperative measures fail. Am J Sports Med 28:350–355

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Gilmore J (1998) Groin pain in the soccer athlete: fact, fiction and treatment. Clin Sports Med 17:787–793

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hölmich P, Uhrskou P, Ulnits L, Kanstrup IL, Nielsen MB, Bjerk AM, Krogsgaard K (1999) Effectiveness of active physical training as treatment for long-standing adductor-related groin pain in athletes: randomised trial. Lancet 353:435–439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Fricker PA, Taunton JE, Ammann W (1991) Osteitis pubis in athletes. Infection, inflammation or injury? Sports Med 12:266–279

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Radic R, Annear P (2008) Use of pubic symphysis curettage for treatment-resistant osteitis pubis in athletes. Am J Sports Med 36:122–128

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ashby EC (1994) Chronic obscure groin pain is commonly caused by enthesopathy: ‘tennis elbow’ of the groin. Br J Surg 81:1632–1634

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gamble JR, Simmons SC, Freedman M (1986) The symphysis pubis. Anatomic and pathological considerations. Clin Orthop 203:261–272

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Williams JG (1978) Limitation of hip joint movement as a factor in traumatic osteitis pubis. Br J Sports Med 12:129–133

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Mehin R, Meek R, O’Brien P, Blachut P (2006) Surgery for osteitis pubis. Can J Surg 49(3):170–177

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Paajanen H, Syvähuoko I, Airo I (2004) Totally extraperitoneal endoscopic (TEP) treatment of sportsman’s hernia. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 14:215–218

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Grace JN, Sim FH, Shives TC, Coventry MB (1989) Wedge resection of the symphysis pubis for the treatment of osteitis pubis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 71:358–364

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Moore RS Jr, Stover MD, Matta JM (1998) Late posterior instability of the pelvis after resection of the symphysis pubis for the treatment of osteitis pubis. A report of two cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am 80:1043–1048

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Mulhall KJ, McKenna J, Walsh A, McCormack D (2002) Osteitis pubis in professional soccer players: a report of outcome with symphyseal curettage in cases refractory to conservative management. Clin J Sport Med 12:179–181

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hechtman KS, Zvijac JE, Popkin CA, Zych GA, Botto-van Bemden A (2010) A minimally disruptive surgical technique for the treatment of osteitis pubis in athletes. Orthopedics 2:210–215

    Google Scholar 

  16. Brennan D, O’Connell MJ, Ryan M, Cunningham P, Taylor D, Cronin C, O’Neill P, Eustace S (2005) Secondary cleft sign as a marker on injury in athletes with groin pain: MR image appearance and interpretation. Radiology 235:162–167

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Robinson P, Salehi F, Grainger A, Clemence M, Schilders E, O’Connor P, Agut A (2007) Cadaveric and MRI study of the musculotendinous contributions to the capsule of the symphysis pubis. Am J Rad 188:440–445

    Google Scholar 

  18. Becker I, Woodley SJ, Stringer MD (2010) The adult human pubic symphysis: a systematic review. J Anat 217:475–487

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Schnute WJ (1961) Osteitis pubis. Clin Orthop 20:187–192

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Cunningham PM, Brennan D, O’Connell M, MacMahon P, O’Neill P, Eustace S (2007) Patterns of bone and soft-tissue injury at the symphysis pubis in soccer players: observations at MRI. AJR 188:291–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Akermark C, Johansson C (1992) Tenotomy of the adductor longus tendon in the treatment of chronic groin pain in athletes. Am J Sports Med 20(6):640–643

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sascha Jörg Hopp.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hopp, S.J., Culemann, U., Kelm, J. et al. Osteitis pubis and adductor tendinopathy in athletes: a novel arthroscopic pubic symphysis curettage and adductor reattachment. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 133, 1003–1009 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-013-1777-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-013-1777-7

Keywords

Navigation