Skip to main content
Log in

The function and muscle strength recovery of shoulder after humeral diaphysis fracture following plating and intramedullary nailing

  • Trauma Surgery
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the shoulder function and shoulder girdle muscle strength of humeral diaphysis fractures postoperatively following intramedullary nailing (IMN) and open reduction internal fixation (ORIF).

Methods

Fifty cases of humeral diaphysis fractures were randomly allocated into two groups. Antegrade IMN and ORIF were, respectively, performed in group I and II. Union status, functional scoring, range of motion, muscle strength of shoulder girdle including external/internal rotation and abduction/adduction strength were recorded at 18 months after surgery. Statistical package for social sciences 13.0 was used for analysis.

Results

Group I had lower functional score than group II (P < 0.05). Both groups had approximately 50 % of muscle strength loss on injured side. In group II, the internal rotation strength loss was significantly greater compared to group I (P < 0.01). The total side to side (internal plus external) range of rotation (ROR) lack and external ROR lack of involved shoulder was significantly greater in group I (P = 0.005 and 0.049). The range of abduction lack was also significantly greater in group I.

Conclusions

Both surgically treated groups had significant loss of muscle strength of shoulder girdle when measured at 18 months postoperatively. There was greater loss of rotation strength in ORIF group than the IMN group. However, IMN had lower functional scores and a decreased range of motion postoperatively. The assumption that rotator cuff damage caused by nailing leads to weaker abduction strength than plating was not supported.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Denard A Jr, Richards JE, Obremskey WT, Tucker MC, Floyd M, Herzog GA (2010) Outcome of nonoperative vs. operative treatment of humeral shaft fractures: a retrospective study of 213 patients. Orthopedics 33(8):552–557

    Google Scholar 

  2. Carroll EA, Schweppe M, Langfitt M, Miller AN, Halvorson JJ (2012) Management of humeral shaft fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 20:423–433

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Mahabier KC, Vogels LM, Punt BJ, Roukema GR, Patka P, Van Lieshout EM (2012) Humeral shaft fractures: Retrospective results of non-operative and operative treatment of 186 patients. Injury 44(4):427–430

    Google Scholar 

  4. Huttunen TT, Kannus P, Lepola V, Pihlajamaki H, Mattila VM (2012) Surgical treatment of humeral-shaft fractures: a register-based study in Finland between 1987 and 2009. Injury 43:1704–1708

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mulier T, Seligson D, Sioen W, van den Bergh J, Reynaert P (1997) Operative treatment of humeral shaft fractures. Acta Orthop Belg 63(3):170–177

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Concha JM, Sandoval A, Streubel PN (2010) Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis for humeral shaft fractures: are results reproducible. Int Orthop 34:1297–1305

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Shin SJ, Sohn HS, Do NH (2012) Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis of humeral shaft fractures: a technique to aid fracture reduction and minimize complications. J Orthop Trauma 26:585–589

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Chapman JR, Henley MB, Agel J, Benca PJ (2000) Randomized prospective study of humeral shaft fracture fixation: intramedullary nails versus plates. J Orthop Trauma 14(3):162–166

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ajmal M, O’Sullivan M, McCabe J, Curtin W (2001) Antegrade locked intramedullary nailing in humeral shaft fractures. Injury 32(9):692–694

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Bhandari M, Devereaux PJ, McKee MD, Schemitsch EH (2006) Compression plating versus intramedullary nailing of humeral shaft fractures—a meta-analysis. Acta Orthop 77(2):279–284

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cox MA, Dolan M, Synnott K, McElwain JP (2000) Closed interlocking nailing of humeral shaft fractures with the Russell-Taylor nail. J Orthop Trauma 14(5):349–353

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Changulani M, Jain UK, Keswani T (2007) Comparison of the use of the humerus intramedullary nail and dynamic compression plate for the management of diaphyseal fractures of the humerus. A randomised controlled study. Int Orthop 31(3):391–395

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Daglar B, Delialioglu OM, Tasbas BA, Bayrakci K, Agar M, Gunel U (2007) Comparison of plate-screw fixation and intramedullary fixation with inflatable nails in the treatment of acute humeral shaft fractures. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 41(1):7–14

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Putti AB, Uppin RB, Putti BB (2009) Locked intramedullary nailing versus dynamic compression plating for humeral shaft fractures. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 17(2):139–141

    Google Scholar 

  15. Golebiewska JA, Mastalerz A, Zielinski JR (2008) Isokinetic muscle torque during glenohumeral rotation in dominant and nondominant limbs. Acta Bioeng Biomech 10(2):69–73

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Broadbent MR, Will E, McQueen MM (2009) Prediction of outcome after humeral diaphyseal fracture. Injury 41(6):572–577

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gierer P, Scholz M, Beck M, Schaser KD, Vollmar B, Mittlmeier T, Gradl G (2010) Microcirculatory sequelae of the rotator cuff after antegrade nailing in proximal humerus fracture. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 130(5):687–691 (Epub 2009 Aug 13)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Flinkkila T, Hyvonen P, Siira P, Hamalainen M (2004) Recovery of shoulder joint function after humeral shaft fracture: a comparative study between antegrade intramedullary nailing and plate fixation. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 124(8):537–541

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Li Y, Wang C, Wang M, Huang L, Huang Q (2011) Postoperative malrotation of humeral shaft fracture after plating compared with intramedullary nailing. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 20(6):947–954

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Fjalestad T, Stromsoe K, Salvesen P, Rostad B (2000) Functional results of braced humeral diaphyseal fractures: why do 38% lose external rotation of the shoulder. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 120:281–285

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

We announce that no financial support was received from any companies or manufactures for this study. All authors confirm that they have no financial and personal relationships with other people or organizations that could inappropriately influence (bias) this work, during the 3 years since the beginning of the work submitted.

Ethical review committee statement

In accordance with the ethical standards in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki, all relevant ethical safeguards have been met in relation to patient or subject protection with the authorization of institute’s ethical review committee.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shaojin Wang.

Additional information

C. Wang and G. Dai contributed to the research equally.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wang, C., Dai, G., Wang, S. et al. The function and muscle strength recovery of shoulder after humeral diaphysis fracture following plating and intramedullary nailing. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 133, 1089–1094 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-013-1768-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-013-1768-8

Keywords

Navigation