Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Multiple drilling compared with standard core decompression for avascular necrosis of the femoral head in sickle cell disease patients

  • Orthopaedic Surgery
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Sickle cell disease (SCD) is the most common cause of avascular necrosis of femoral head (ANFH) in childhood. Advances in medical treatment led to improved life expectancy of such patients. SCD-related ANFH frequently progress to total collapse of the femoral head necessitating hip replacement. However, SCD patient are at more risk of intra- and post-operative complications and suboptimal outcome of total hip arthroplasty. Hence, it is imperative to preserve the femoral head as long as possible.

Patients and methods

Between September 1992 and June 2007, 94 core decompression procedures were done to SCD patients who had modified Ficat stage I, IIA and IIB ANFH. Sixty one patients underwent a classical 8-mm drilling and 33 patients underwent 3.2-mm diameter MD technique. Patients were followed up for minimum of 2 years and were evaluated for clinical and Harris Hip Score improvement and for radiological progression.

Results

All 19 hips that had Ficat stage I had significant reduction of pain and improvement of Harris Hip Score. No patient has required further surgery. Among the 39 hips with Ficat IIA at time of procedure, 80 % of hips which underwent CD and 78 % of MD cases had significant reduction of pain and improvement of HHS. Those patients showed no radiographic progression of the disease. The remaining, 20 % CD and 22 % MD eventually progressed radiologically to grade III or grade IV and had HHS less than 75 at last visit. In the 36 cases with Ficat IIB, 52 % CD and 52.8 % MC had significant reduction of pain and improvement of HHS. The rest showed no improvement in pain and function, and progressed to stage IV; 11 of them underwent THA and one patient refused surgery.

Conclusion

While multiple drilling is safer and less invasive than single coring in SCD, there is no statistically significant difference in outcome or complication rate between both procedures done for ANFH in patients with SCD.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Styles LA, Vichinsky EP (1996) Core decompression in avascular necrosis of the hip in sickle-cell disease. Am J Hematol 52(2):103–107

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hernigou P, Galacteros F, Bachir D, Goutallier D (1991) Deformities of the hip in adults who have sickle-cell disease and had avascular necrosis in childhood. A natural history of fifty-two patients. J Bone Jt Surg Am 73(1):81–92

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Cheng EY, Thongtrangan I, Laorr A, Saleh KJ (2004) Spontaneous resolution of osteonecrosis of the femoral head. J Bone Jt Surg Am 86-A(12):2594–2599

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hernigou P, Bachir D, Galacteros F (2003) The natural history of symptomatic osteonecrosis in adults with sickle-cell disease. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A(3):500–504

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ficat RP (1985) Idiopathic bone necrosis of the femoral head. Early diagnosis and treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Br 67(1):3–9

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Jeong GK, Ruchelsman DE, Jazrawi LM, Jaffe WL (2005) Total hip arthroplasty in sickle cell hemoglobinopathies. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 13(3):208–217

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Acurio MT, Friedman RJ (1992) Hip arthroplasty in patients with sickle-cell haemoglobinopathy. J Bone Joint Surg Br 74(3):367–371

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Moran MC, Huo MH, Garvin KL, Pellicci PM, Salvati EA (1993) Total hip arthroplasty in sickle cell hemoglobinopathy. Clin Orthop Relat Res 294:140–148

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Clarke HJ, Jinnah RH, Brooker AF, Michaelson JD (1989) Total replacement of the hip for avascular necrosis in sickle cell disease. J Bone Jt Surg Br 71(3):465–470

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hickman JM, Lachiewicz PF (1997) Results and complications of total hip arthroplasties in patients with sickle-cell hemoglobinopathies. Role of cementless components. J Arthroplasty 12(4):420–425

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hernigou P, Habibi A, Bachir D, Galacteros F (2006) The natural history of asymptomatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head in adults with sickle cell disease. J Bone Jt Surg Am 88(12):2565–2572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Song WS, Yoo JJ, Kim YM, Kim HJ (2007) Results of multiple drilling compared with those of conventional methods of core decompression. Clin Orthop Relat Res 454:139–146

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mont MA, Ragland PS, Etienne G (2004) Core decompression of the femoral head for osteonecrosis using percutaneous multiple small-diameter drilling. Clin Orthop Relat Res (429):131–138

  14. Marker DR, Seyler TM, Ulrich SD, Srivastava S, Mont MA (2008) Do modern techniques improve core decompression outcomes for hip osteonecrosis? Clin Orthop Relat Res 466(5):1093–1103

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Smith SW, Fehring TK, Griffin WL, Beaver WB (1995) Core decompression of the osteonecrotic femoral head. J Bone Jt Surg Am 77(5):674–680

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Lavernia CJ, Sierra RJ (2000) Core decompression in atraumatic osteonecrosis of the hip. J Arthroplasty 15(2):171–178

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Mukisi MM, Bashoun K, Burny F (2009) Sickle-cell hip necrosis and intraosseous pressure. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 95(2):134–138

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Mont MA, Carbone JJ, Fairbank AC (1996) Core decompression versus nonoperative management for osteonecrosis of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res (324):169–178

  19. Stulberg BN, Davis AW, Bauer TW, Levine M, Easley K (1991) Osteonecrosis of the femoral head. A prospective randomized treatment protocol. Clin Orthop Relat Res (268):140–151

  20. Floerkemeier T, Lutz A, Nackenhorst U, Thorey F, Waizy H, Windhagen H, von Lewinski G (2011) Core decompression and osteonecrosis intervention rod in osteonecrosis of the femoral head: clinical outcome and finite element analysis. Int Orthop 35(10):1461–1466. doi:10.1007/s00264-010-1138-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Gong SY, Kim HW, Park HW, Lee SY, Lee KS (2011) Effects of multiple drilling on the ischemic capital femoral epiphysis of immature piglets. Yonsei Med J 52(5):809–817

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Shimizu K, Moriya H, Akita T, Sakamoto M, Suguro T (1994) Prediction of collapse with magnetic resonance imaging of avascular necrosis of the femoral head. J Bone Jt Surg Am 76(2):215–223

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Steinberg ME, Bands RE, Parry S, Hoffman E, Chan T, Hartman KM (1999) Does lesion size affect the outcome in avascular necrosis? Clin Orthop Relat Res (367):262–271

  24. Hungerford DS, Jones LC (2008) Core decompression. Tech Orthop 23(1):26–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank Dr. Adel Yusuf (Biostatician) who helped me a lot in statistical analysis of the results.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abdullah Al Omran.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Al Omran, A. Multiple drilling compared with standard core decompression for avascular necrosis of the femoral head in sickle cell disease patients. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 133, 609–613 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-013-1714-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-013-1714-9

Keywords

Navigation