Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Closed suction drainage with or without re-transfusion of filtered shed blood does not offer advantages in primary non-cemented total hip replacement using a direct anterior approach

  • Hip Arthroplasty
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Wondering if the use of drains allowing re-transfusion of shed blood as opposed to closed suction drains or no drains would improve quality of care to patients undergoing simple non-cemented primary total hip replacement (THR) using a direct anterior approach, a three-arm prospective randomized study was conducted.

Method

One hundred and twenty patients were prospectively randomized to receive no drain, closed suction drains or drains designed for re-transfusion of shed blood. Blood loss, VAS pain scores, thigh swelling, hematoma formation, number of dressings changed and hospital stay were compared and patients followed for 3 months.

Results

Drains did not have any significance on postoperative haemoglobin and haematocrit levels or homologous blood transfusion rates. Patients receiving homologous blood transfusions had too small drain volumes to benefit from re-transfusion and patients, who get drained fluid re-transfused, were far away from being in need of homologous blood transfusion. Omitting drains resulted in more thigh swelling accompanied with a tendency of slightly more pain during the first postoperative day but without effect on clinical and radiological outcome at 3 months. Earlier dry operation sites resulting in simplified wound care and shorter hospital stay was encountered when no drain was used.

Conclusion

The possibility to re-transfuse drained blood was not an argument for using drains and, accepting more thigh swelling, we stop to use drains in simple non-cemented primary THR using the direct anterior approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cobb JP (1990) Why use drains? J Bone Joint Surg Br 72(6):993–995

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Waugh TR, Stinchfield FE (1961) Suction drainage of orthopaedic wounds. J Bone Joint Surg Am 43-A:939–946

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Magee C, Rodeheaver GT, Golden GT, Fox J, Edgerton MT, Edlich RF (1976) Potentiation of wound infection by surgical drains. Am J Surg 131(5):547–549

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Overgaard S, Thomsen NO, Kulinski B, Mossing NB (1993) Closed suction drainage after hip arthroplasty. Prospective study of bacterial contamination in 81 cases. Acta Orthop Scand 64(4):417–420

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Sorensen AI, Sorensen TS (1991) Bacterial growth on suction drain tips. Prospective study of 489 clean orthopedic operations. Acta Orthop Scand 62(5):451–454

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Mengal B, Aebi J, Rodriguez A, Lemaire R (2001) A prospective randomized study of wound drainage versus non-drainage in primary total hip or knee arthroplasty. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 87(1):29–39

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Grosvenor D, Goyal V, Goodman S (2000) Efficacy of postoperative blood salvage following total hip arthroplasty in patients with and without deposited autologous units. J Bone Joint Surg Am 82-A(7):951–954

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Han CD, Shin DE (1997) Postoperative blood salvage and reinfusion after total joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 12(5):511–516

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Mauerhan DR, Nussman D, Mokris JG, Beaver WB (1993) Effect of postoperative reinfusion systems on hemoglobin levels in primary total hip and total knee arthroplasties. A prospective randomized study. J Arthroplasty 8(5):523–527

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Rollo VJ, Hozack WJ, Rothman RH, Chao W, Eng KO (1995) Prospective randomized evaluation of blood salvage techniques for primary total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 10(4):532–539

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Smith LK, Williams DH, Langkamer VG (2007) Post-operative blood salvage with autologous retransfusion in primary total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89(8):1092–1097

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Strumper D, Weber EW, Gielen-Wijffels S, Van Drumpt R, Bulstra S, Slappendel R, Durieux ME, Marcus MA (2004) Clinical efficacy of postoperative autologous transfusion of filtered shed blood in hip and knee arthroplasty. Transfusion 44(11):1567–1571

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Charrois O, Kahwaji A, Gagnaire AL, Courpied JP (2005) Variables influencing bleeding during total hip arthroplasty. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 91(2):132–136

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Brooker AF, Bowerman JW, Robinson RA, Riley LH (1973) Ectopic ossification following total hip replacement. Incidence and a method of classification. J Bone Joint Surg Am 55(8):1629–1632

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Juelsgaard P, Larsen UT, Sorensen JV, Madsen F, Soballe K (2001) Hypotensive epidural anesthesia in total knee replacement without tourniquet: reduced blood loss and transfusion. Reg Anesth Pain Med 26(2):105–110

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Dora C, von Campe A, Mengiardi B, Koch P, Vienne P (2007) Simplified wound care and earlier wound recovery without closed suction drainage in elective total hip arthroplasty. A prospective randomized trial in 100 operations. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 127(10):919–923

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Healy JC, Frankforter SA, Graves BK, Reddy RL, Beck JR (1994) Preoperative autologous blood donation in total-hip arthroplasty. A cost-effectiveness analysis. Arch Pathol Lab Med 118(4):465–470

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Henry DA, Carless PA, Moxey AJ, O’Connell D, Forgie MA, Wells PS, Fergusson D (2002) Pre-operative autologous donation for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2:CD003602

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Andersson I, Tylman M, Bengtson JP, Bengtsson A (2001) Complement split products and pro-inflammatory cytokines in salvaged blood after hip and knee arthroplasty. Can J Anaesth 48(3):251–255

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kim YH, Cho SH, Kim RS (1998) Drainage versus nondrainage in simultaneous bilateral total hip arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty 13(2):156–161

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they don’t have any conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Claudio Dora.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kleinert, K., Werner, C., Mamisch-Saupe, N. et al. Closed suction drainage with or without re-transfusion of filtered shed blood does not offer advantages in primary non-cemented total hip replacement using a direct anterior approach. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 132, 131–136 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-011-1387-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-011-1387-1

Keywords

Navigation