Skip to main content
Log in

Dynamization of locked plating on distal femur fracture

  • Trauma Surgery
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Most of the clinical studies on the results of MIPO (minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis) with the use of anatomically preshaped locking plates for the complex distal femoral fractures have shown favorable results. In the application of bridge plating, placement of lag screws to the butterfly fragments is usually not recommended because it may make the whole construct too stiff. Recently, problems of nonunion related to excessive stiffness after MIPO using a locked plate were reported but the only solution suggested was reoperation with a bone graft. We herein report a case of nonunion after MIPO of the distal femoral fracture where we applied a concept of “dynamization of the plate-bone construct” to make it less stiff and in turn to get fracture healing with bridging callus formation. A 58-year-old woman sustained a simple oblique fracture of the distal femur (AO-OTA 33A1). We performed MIPO procedure using a locking compression plate-distal femur. To get the alignment, we have placed a conventional screw across the fracture line through the dynamic compression unit (DCU) of the combination hole. Postoperative radiographs revealed 7–8 mm gap across the entire fracture surface which was not obvious on the intra-operative C-arm images. Radiographs taken 6 months after operation showed almost no callus formation with shuttle marginal resorption. We interpreted the situation that the construct was too stiff to allow motion across the fracture site due to the lag screw. We thought we have used it as a reduction screw but it acted as a lag screw, preventing motion at the fracture site. Given this analysis, we have only taken the lag screw out to make the construct less stable. It caused the situation of absolute stability with a significant gap to turn into the one of relative stability with acceptable gap. Fracture has solidly healed with bridging callus formation 6 months after lag screw removal under local anesthesia. We would like to call this strategy as “dynamization” of the locked plating.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  1. Egol KA, Kubiak EN, Fulkerson E, Kummer FJ, Koval KJ (2004) Biomechanics of locked plates and screws. J Orthop Trauma 18:488–493

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Perren SM (2002) Evolution of the internal fixation of long bone fractures. The scientific basis of biological internal fixation: choosing a new balance between stability and biology. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 84-B:1093–1110

    Google Scholar 

  3. Henderson CE, Bottlang M, Marsh JL, Fitzpatrick DC, Madey SM (2008) Does locked plating of periprosthetic supracondylar femur fractures promote bone healing by callus formation? Two cases with opposite outcomes. Iowa Orthop J 28:73–76

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Strauss EJ, Schwarzkopf R, Kummer F, Egol KA (2008) The current status of locked plating: the good, the bad, and the ugly. J Orthop Trauma 22:479–486

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kubiak EN, Fulkerson E, Strauss E, Egol KA (2006) The evolution of locked plates. J Bone Jt Surg Am 88:189–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Button G, Wolinsky P, Hak D (2004) Failure of less invasive stabilization system plates in the distal femur: a report of four cases. J Orthop Trauma 18:565–570

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Weight M, Collinge C (2004) Early results of the less invasive stabilization system for mechanically unstable fractures of the distal femur (AO/OTA types A2, A3, C2, and C3). J Orthop Trauma 18:503–508

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kregor PJ (2002) Distal femur fractures with complex articular involvement: management by articular exposure and submuscular fixation. Orthop Clin North Am 33:153–175, ix

    Google Scholar 

  9. Schandelmaier P, Partenheimer A, Koenemann B, Grun OA, Krettek C (2001) Distal femoral fractures and LISS stabilization. Injury 32(Suppl 3):SC55–SC63

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Schutz M, Muller M, Krettek C, Hontzsch D, Regazzoni P, Ganz R, Haas N (2001) Minimally invasive fracture stabilization of distal femoral fractures with the LISS: a prospective multicenter study. Results of a clinical study with special emphasis on difficult cases. Injury 32(Suppl 3):SC48–SC54

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ellis T, Bourgeault CA, Kyle RF (2001) Screw position affects dynamic compression plate strain in an in vitro fracture model. J Orthop Trauma 15:333–337

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Gautier E, Sommer C (2003) Guidelines for the clinical application of the LCP. Injury 34:63–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Stoffel K, Dieter U, Stachowiak G, Gächter A, Kuster MS (2003) Biomechanical testing of the LCP––how can stability in locked internal fixators be controlled? Injury 34:11–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bucholz RW, Heckman JD (2001) Rockwood and Green’s Fractures in Adults, 5 edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, USA

  15. Krettek C, Haas N, Tscherne H (1991) The role of supplemental lag-screw fixation for open fractures of the tibial shaft treated with external fixation. J Bone Jt Surg Am 73:893–897

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Claes LE, Heigele CA, Neidlinger-Wilke C, Kaspar D, Seidl W, Margevicius KJ, Augat P (1998) Effects of mechanical factors on the fracture healing process. Clin Orthop Relat Res 355 Suppl:S132–S147

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kenwright J, Goodship AE, Kelly DJ, Newman JH, Harris JD, Richardson JB, Evans M, Spriggins AJ, Burrough SJ, Rowley DI (1986) Effect of controlled axial micromovement on healing of tibial fractures. Lancet 328:1185–1187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Caja VL, Kim W, Larsson S, Chao EYS (1995) Comparison of the mechanical performance of three types of external fixators: linear, circular and hybrid. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 10:401–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Duda GN, Sollmann M, Sporrer S, Hoffmann JE, Kassi JP, Khodadadyan C, Raschke M (2002) Interfragmentary motion in tibial osteotomies stabilized with ring fixators. Clin Orthop Relat Res 396:163–172

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Marti A, Fankhauser C, Frenk A, Cordey J, Gasser B (2001) Biomechanical evaluation of the less invasive stabilization system for the internal fixation of distal femur fractures. J Orthop Trauma 15:482–487

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Stoffel K, Lorenz KU, Kuster MS (2007) Biomechanical considerations in plate osteosynthesis: the effect of plate-to-bone compression with and without angular screw stability. J Orthop Trauma 21:362–368

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jin-Ho Hwang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Oh, JK., Hwang, JH., Lee, SJ. et al. Dynamization of locked plating on distal femur fracture. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 131, 535–539 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-010-1202-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-010-1202-4

Keywords

Navigation