Skip to main content
Log in

Differences in muscle trauma quantifiable in the laboratory between the minimally invasive anterolateral and transgluteal approach

  • Orthopaedic Surgery
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

In Europe the minimized transgluteal (TG) and anterolateral (AL) approaches are increasingly preferred in hip arthroplasty (THA).

Method

The present investigation determined which of these approaches causes the least muscle trauma. Forty patients who received a THA were enrolled in this prospective randomized study. Muscle trauma was quantified by perioperatively measuring the serum concentration of skeletal troponin I (sTnI). The Harris hip score (HHS) was determined before and 12 months after surgery.

Results

It increased significantly in all patients without being different between the groups (AL, 48.2→83.6; TG, 50.8→85.9). Patients in the TG group had a higher sTnI than those in the AL group 24 h postoperatively (21.6 vs. 10.9 nmol/ml, p = 0.022). The AL approach results in a reduced muscle traumatization compared with the TG approach, without this being revealed by the HHS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Laffosse JM, Chiron P, Tricoire JL, Giordano G, Molinier F, Puget J (2007) Prospective and comparative study of minimally invasive posterior approach versus standard posterior approach in total hip replacement. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 93:228–237

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Jerosch J, Theising C, Fadel ME (2006) Antero-lateral minimal invasive (ALMI) approach for total hip arthroplasty technique and early results. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 126:164–173

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lawlor M, Humphreys P, Morrow E, Ogonda L, Bennett D, Elliott D, Beverland D (2005) Comparison of early postoperative functional levels following total hip replacement using minimally invasive versus standard incisions. A prospective randomized blinded trial. Clin Rehabil 19:465–474

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. McMinn DJ, Daniel J, Pynsent PB, Pradhan C (2005) Mini-incision resurfacing arthroplasty of hip through the posterior approach. Clin Orthop Relat Res 441:91–98

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ogonda L, Wilson R, Archbold P, Lawlor M, Humphreys P, O’Brien S, Beverland D (2005) A minimal-incision technique in total hip arthroplasty does not improve early postoperative outcomes. A prospective, randomized, controlled trial. J Bone Jt Surg Am 87:701–710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bennett D, Ogonda L, Elliott D, Humphreys L, Lawlor M, Beverland D (2007) Comparison of immediate postoperative walking ability in patients receiving minimally invasive and standard-incision hip arthroplasty: a prospective blinded study. J Arthroplast 22:490–495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Howell JR, Masri BA, Duncan CP (2004) Minimally invasive versus standard incision anterolateral hip replacement: a comparative study. Orthop Clin North Am 35:153–162

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Nakata K, Nishikawa M, Yamamoto K, Hirota S, Yoshikawa H (2009) A clinical comparative study of the direct anterior with mini-posterior approach two consecutive series. J Arthroplast 24:698–704

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lin DH, Jan MH, Liu TK, Lin YF, Hou SM (2007) Effects of anterolateral minimally invasive surgery in total hip arthroplasty on hip muscle strength, walking speed, and functional score. J Arthroplast 22:1187–1192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Roth A, Venbrocks RA (2007) Total hip replacement through a minimally invasive, anterolateral approach with the patient supine. Oper Orthop Traumatol 19:442–457

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wohlrab D, Hagel A, Hein W (2004) Advantages of minimal invasive total hip replacement in the early phase of rehabilitation. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 142:685–690

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Pagnano MW, Leone J, Lewallen DG, Hanssen AD (2005) Two-incision THA had modest outcomes and some substantial complications. Clin Orthop Relat Res 441:86–90

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mardones R, Pagnano MW, Nemanich JP, Trousdale RT (2005) The Frank Stinchfield Award: muscle damage after total hip arthroplasty done with the two-incision and mini-posterior techniques. Clin Orthop Relat Res 441:63–67

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Harris WH (1969) Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Jt Surg Am 51:737–755

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Simpson JA, Labugger R, Collier C, Brison RJ, Iscoe S, Van Eyk JE (2005) Fast and slow skeletal troponin I in serum from patients with various skeletal muscle disorders: a pilot study. Clin Chem 51:966–972

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Schaser KD, Bail HJ, Schewior L, Stover JF, Melcher I, Haas NP, Mittlmeier T (2005) Acute effects of N-acetylcysteine on skeletal muscle microcirculation following closed soft tissue trauma in rats. J Orthop Res 23:231–241

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Roy BR, Binns MS, Horsfall H (2001) Radiological diagnosis of abductor denervation after hip surgery. Skeletal Radiol 30:117–118

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Siebenrock KA, Rosler KM, Gonzalez E, Ganz R (2000) Intraoperative electromyography of the superior gluteal nerve during lateral approach to the hip for arthroplasty: a prospective study of 12 patients. J Arthroplast 15:867–870

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ince A, Kemper M, Waschke J, Hendrich C (2007) Minimally invasive anterolateral approach to the hip: risk to the superior gluteal nerve. Acta Orthop 78:86–89

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Georg Matziolis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Matziolis, D., Wassilew, G., Strube, P. et al. Differences in muscle trauma quantifiable in the laboratory between the minimally invasive anterolateral and transgluteal approach. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 131, 651–655 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-010-1190-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-010-1190-4

Keywords

Navigation