Abstract
Introduction
Multidisciplinary medical management of osteoporosis and osteoporosis-related fractures is still an important treatment issue today. In view of ethiopathology of osteoporosis and the future demographic development an increasing socioeconomic burden has to be estimated. A prerequisite for an effective secondary prophylaxis of osteoporotic fractures is the implementation of a treatment network, with inclusion of all partners involved in patient’s care. Therefore, special attention should be paid to formation and establishment of centres with multidisciplinary and integrated treatment concepts. This paper outlines the concept of a clinical centre for diagnosis and therapy of osteoporosis established 4 years ago. Furthermore, a concept of integrated care of osteoporosis-related fractures is introduced and the obtained data of a 2-year follow-up analysis will be presented.
Methods
The establishment of an osteoporosis centre at a university teaching hospital as well as certification according to the Dachverband Osteologie (DVO) guidelines were necessary. Recruitment of contract partners on both sides, health insurances and outpatient general practitioners as well as specialist doctors, was also essential. The implementation of an osteoporosis coordinator was a step to put the treatment concept into practice.
Results and discussion
Based on the recommendations of DVO guidelines, all diagnostic and therapeutic requirements of osteoporosis can be met by the team of consultant specialists at a clinical osteoporosis centre. In the described treatment concept of integrated care, 44 patients suffering of osteoporosis with a consecutive fracture could be included. Mean age was 77. Inclusion criteria were spinal fractures (61%), proximal femoral fractures (27%) and peripheral fractures (12%). Fifty percent of patients included into the contract had not received previous osteoporosis medication. Sixty-eight patients who met the inclusion criteria could not be included due to the lack of compliance (42%), patients’ disapproval (34%) or incomplete treatment and documentation algorithm (24%). Special attention should focus on the completion of standardised diagnosis and documentation. The high amount of time and personnel required has proven the importance of the introduction of an osteoporosis coordinator to be essential.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- DVO:
-
Dachverband Osteologie e.V. = Umbrella Organisation of German Scientific Osteology-related Societies
- REKO:
-
Regionale Expertenkommission Osteoporose = Regional Advisory Board Osteoporosis
References
Abendroth K, Geidel H, Leube K, Poetzschner R, Schröder HE, Völz B (1999) Interdisciplinary quality circle for osteoporosis: first results from the Regional Advisory Board for Osteoporosis for Saxony-Thuringia. Zeitschrift für ärztliche Fortbildung und Qualitätssicherung 93(8):605–611
Alegre-Lopez J, Cordero-Guevara J, Alonso-Valdivielso JL, Fernandez-Melon J (2005) Factors associated with mortality and functional disability after hip fracture: an inception cohort study. Osteoporos Int 16(7):729–736
Bahrs C, Türk A, Eingartner C, Weise K, Rolauffs B, Stuby F (2008) Evaluation of a strategy for the management of accompanying osteoporosis after inpatient treatment of fragility fractures. Zeitschrift für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie 146(1):52–58
Bogoch Earl R, Elliot-Gibson V, Beaton Dorcas E, Jamal Sophie A, Josse Robert G, Murray Timothy M (2006) Effective initiation of osteoporosis diagnosis and treatment for patients with a fragility fracture in an orthopaedic environment. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88(1):25–34
Brankin E, Mitchell C, Munro R (2005) Closing the osteoporosis management gap in primary care: a secondary prevention of fracture programme. Curr Med Res Opin 21(4):475–482
Cockerill W, Lunt M, Silman AJ, Cooper C, Lips P, Bhalla AK et al (2004) Health-related quality of life and radiographic vertebral fracture. Osteoporos Int 15(2):113–119
Cuddihy M-T, Gabriel SE, Crowson CS, Atkinson EJ, Tabini C, O’Fallon WM, Melton LJ 3rd (2002) Osteoporosis intervention following distal forearm fractures: a missed opportunity. Arch Intern Med 162(4):421–426
Dreinhofer KE, Anderson M, Feron J-M, Herrera A, Hube R, Johnell O et al (2005) Multinational survey of osteoporotic fracture management. Osteoporos Int 16(2):S44–S53
Feldstein A, Elmer Patricia J, Orwoll E, Herson M, Hillier T (2003) Bone mineral density measurement and treatment for osteoporosis in older individuals with fractures: a gap in evidence-based practice guideline implementation. Arch Intern Med 163(18):2165–2172
Feldstein AC, Vollmer WM, Smith DH, Petrik A, Schneider J, Glauber H, Herson M (2007) An outreach program improved osteoporosis management after a fracture. J Am Geriatr Soc 55(9):1464–1469
Gluer CC, Eastell R, Reid DM, Felsenberg D, Roux C, Barkmann R et al (2004) Association of five quantitative ultrasound devices and bone densitometry with osteoporotic vertebral fractures in a population-based sample: the OPUS Study. J Bone Miner Res 19(5):782–793
Haussler B, Gothe H, Gol D, Glaeske G, Pientka L, Felsenberg D (2007) Epidemiology, treatment and costs of osteoporosis in Germany? The BoneEVA Study. Osteoporos Int 18(1):77–84
Kanis JA, Johnell O (2005) Requirements for DXA for the management of osteoporosis in Europe. Osteoporos Int 16(3):229–238
Kanis JA, Oden A, Johnell O, Johansson H, De Laet C, Brown J et al (2007) The use of clinical risk factors enhances the performance of BMD in the prediction of hip and osteoporotic fractures in men and women. Osteoporos Int 18(8):1033–1046
Lewiecki EM, Baim S, Siris ES (2008) Osteoporosis care at risk in the United States. Osteoporos Int 19(11):1505–1509
Lohmann R, Haid K, Stockle U, Raschke M (2007) Epidemiologie und Perspektiven der Alterstraumatologie. Unfallchirurg 110(6):553–560
Majumdar SR, Johnson JA, Lier DA, Russell AS, Hanley DA, Blitz S et al (2007) Persistence, reproducibility, and cost-effectiveness of an intervention to improve the quality of osteoporosis care after a fracture of the wrist: results of a controlled trial. Osteoporos Int 18(3):261–270
Melton LJ 3rd, Atkinson EJ, O’Connor MK, O’Fallon WM, Riggs BL (2000) Determinants of bone loss from the femoral neck in women of different ages. J Bone Miner Res 15(1):24–31
NIH Consensus Development Panel on Osteoporosis Prevention, Diagnosis, Therapy (2001) Osteoporosis prevention, diagnosis, and therapy. JAMA 285(6):785–795
Papaioannou A, Kennedy CC, Ioannidis G, Sawka A, Hopman WM, Pickard L et al (2008) The impact of incident fractures on health-related quality of life: 5 years of data from the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study. Osteoporos Int (epub ahead of print)
Sander B, Elliot-Gibson V, Beaton DE, Bogoch ER, Maetzel A (2008) A coordinator program in post-fracture osteoporosis management improves outcomes and saves costs. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90(6):1197–1205
Solomon DH, Katz JN, Finkelstein JS, Polinski JM, Stedman M, Brookhart MA et al (2007) Osteoporosis improvement: a large-scale randomized controlled trial of patient and primary care physician education. J Bone Miner Res 22(11):1808–1815
Strom O, Borgstrom F, Zethraeus N, Johnell O, Lidgren L, Ponzer S et al (2008) Long-term cost and effect on quality of life of osteoporosis-related fractures in Sweden. Acta Orthop 79(2):269–280
Tosi Laura L, Gliklich R, Kannan K, Koval Kenneth J (2008) The American Orthopaedic Association’s ‘own the bone’ initiative to prevent secondary fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90(1):163–173
Warming L, Hassager C, Christiansen C (2002) Changes in bone mineral density with age in men and women: a longitudinal study. Osteoporos Int 13(2):105–112
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Strassberger, C., Unger, L., Weber, A.T. et al. Management of osteoporosis-related bone fractures: an integrated concept of care. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 130, 103–109 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-009-0989-3
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-009-0989-3