Abstract
Introduction
Closed suction drainage in joint replacement surgery has been considered to carry an obvious risk of bacteria invasion. Previous studies have shown controversial results regarding the role of suction drain culture in predicting artificial joint infection. Furthermore, the efficacy of the method has not been established in revision total hip or knee arthroplasty.
Materials and methods
Suction drain tips from 110 patients who underwent 73 primary and 37 revision non-infected total hip arthroplasties were prospectively cultured. The drains removed at 48 h postoperatively. The patients had an average age of 64.3 years (range 25–81 years) and followed up for 2–4 years (average 2.8 years).
Results
Positive cultures were identified in two primary (2.74%) and six revision (16.22%) total hip replacements (p = 0.017). The most frequently isolated microorganisms were Staphylococcus aureus (3 cases) and S. epidermidis (2 cases). Resistance to perioperative antibiotics was found in three out of eight isolated pathogens. However, no infection was recorded in any of the eight patients whose cultures found positive.
Conclusion
Although suction drains are more often contaminated in revision total hip arthroplasty, the prognostic value of the method in determining joint infection is very limited and its routine use is not supported from the clinical data.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adalberth G, Bystrom S, Kolstad K, Mallmin H, Milbrink J (1998) Postoperative drainage of knee arthroplasty is not necessary: a randomized study of 90 patients. Acta Orthop Scand 69:475–478
Bernard L, Pron B, Vuagnat A, Gleizes V, Signoret F, Denormandie P, Si-Ali A, Perrone C, Feron JM, Gaillard JL (2002) The value of suction drainage fluid culture during aseptic and septic orthopedic surgery: a prospective study of 901 patients. Clin Infect Dis 34:46–49
Berry DJ, Chandler HP, Reilly DT (1991) The use of bone allografts in two-stage reconstruction after failure of hip replacements due to infection. J Bone Joint Surg Am 73:1460–1468
Burnett JW, Gustilo RB, Williams DN, Kind AC (1980) Prophylactic antibiotics in hip fractures. A double-blind, prospective study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 62:457–462
Crevoisier XM, Reber P, Noesberger B (1998) Is suction drainage necessary after total joint arthroplasty? A prospective study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 117:121–124
Esler CN, Blakeway C, Fiddian NJ (2003) The use of a closed-suction drain in total knee arthroplasty. A prospective, randomised study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 85:215–217
Girvent R, Marti D, Munoz JM (1994) The clinical significance of suction drainage cultures. Acta Orthop Belg 60:290–292
Kobayashi H, Oethinger M, Tuohy MJ, Procop GW, Bauer TW (2008) Improved detection of biofilm-formative Bacteria by vortexing and sonication: a pilot study. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 7 November (Epub ahead of print)
Lidwell OM, Elson RA, Lowbury EJ, Whyte W, Blowers R, Stanley SJ, Lowe D (1987) Ultraclean air and antibiotics for prevention of postoperative infection. A multicenter study of 8, 052 joint replacement operations. Acta Orthop Scand 58:4–13
Lindgren U, Elmros T, Holm SE (1976) Bacteria in hip surgery. A study of routine aerobic and anaerobic cultivation from skin and closed suction wound drains. Acta Orthop Scand 47:320–323
Malchau H, Herberts P, Ahnfelt L (1993) Prognosis of total hip replacement in Sweden. Follow-up of 92, 675 operations performed 1978–1990. Acta Orthop Scand 64:497–506
McKenna PB, O’Shea K, Masterson EL (2008) Two-stage revision of infected hip arthroplasty using a shortened post-operative course of antibiotics. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2 August (Epub ahead of print)
Overgaard S, Thomsen NO, Kulinski B, Mossing NB (1993) Closed suction drainage after hip arthroplasty. Prospective study of bacterial contamination in 81 cases. Acta Orthop Scand 64:417–420
Reilly TJ, Gradisar IA Jr, Pakan W, Reilly M (1986) The use of postoperative suction drainage in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 208:238–242
Sankar B, Ray P, Rai J (2004) Suction drain tip culture in orthopaedic surgery: a prospective study of 214 clean operations. Int Orthop 28:311–314
Sorensen AI, Sorensen TS (1991) Bacterial growth on suction drain tips. Prospective study of 489 clean orthopedic operations. Acta Orthop Scand 62:451–454
Trampuz A, Piper KE, Jacobson MJ, Hanssen AD, Unni KK, Osmon DR, Mandrekar JN, Cockerill FR, Steckelberg JM, Greenleaf JF, Patel R (2007) Sonication of removed hip and knee prostheses for diagnosis of infection. N Engl J Med 357:654–663
Waugh TR, Stinchfield FE (1961) Suction drainage of orthopaedic wounds. J Bone Joint Surg Am 43-A:939–946
Weinrauch P (2005) Diagnostic value of routine drain tip culture in primary joint arthroplasty. ANZ J Surg 75:887–888
Willemen D, Paul J, White SH, Crook DW (1991) Closed suction drainage following knee arthroplasty. Effectiveness and risks. Clin Orthop Relat Res 264:232–234
Willett KM, Simmons CD, Bentley G (1988) The effect of suction drains after total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 70:607–610
Wymenga AB, van Horn JR, Theeuwes A, Muytjens HL, Slooff TJ (1992) Perioperative factors associated with septic arthritis after arthroplasty. Prospective multicenter study of 362 knee and 2, 651 hip operations. Acta Orthop Scand 63:665–671
Zamora-Navas P, Collado-Torres F, de la Torre-Solis F (1999) Closed suction drainage after knee arthroplasty. A prospective study of the effectiveness of the operation and of bacterial contamination. Acta Orthop Belg 65:44–47
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Petsatodis, G., Parziali, M., Christodoulou, A.G. et al. Prognostic value of suction drain tip culture in determining joint infection in primary and non-infected revision total hip arthroplasty: a prospective comparative study and review of the literature. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 129, 1645–1649 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-009-0844-6
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-009-0844-6