Abstract
Purpose
To present a case series of patients with isolated posterior coronal fractures of lateral tibial plateau treated by direct exposure and buttress plate fixation through posterolateral approach.
Methods
Between May 2007 and April of 2008, eight middle aged patients were identified that had isolated posterior coronal fractures of the lateral tibial plateau. All eight patients underwent direct fracture exposure, reduction under visualization, and buttress plate fixation through posterolateral approach.
Results
There were 1 case of split, two cases of pure depression and five cases of split-depression fractures. Four were associated fibular head split fractures without common peroneal nerve injuries. Five patients were injured from a simple fall on riding electrical bicycle while the knee was relaxed in 90° position The articular displacement (8 cases) measured in CT scan was 10.5 mm in average (range 8–15 mm). The cortical split length (from the articular rim to the distal tip, 6 cases) was 2.8 cm in average (range 2.4–3.5 cm). The articular reduction was perfect in seven (absolutely no step-off) and imperfect in 1(<2 mm step-off) as measured by X-ray. With a mean follow-up of 10 months (6 cases > 12 months), the average range of motion arc was 119°, four patients have flexion lag 10°–20°. The average SMFA dysfunction score was 15.8, and average HSS score was 98. All eight patients stated they were highly satisfied.
Conclusions
Direct posterolateral approach by dividing lateral border of soleus muscle, provides excellent fracture reduction under visualization and internal buttress plate fixation for posterior coronal fracture of the lateral tibial plateau. Good functional results and recovery can be expected.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Moore T (1981) Fracture dislocation of the knee. Clin Orthop 156:128–140
Schatzker J, Tile M (2005) The rational of operative fracture care. 3rd edn. Springer-Verlag
Khan RM, Khan SH, Ahmad AJ et al (2000) Tibial plateau fractures. A new classification scheme. Clin Orthop 375:231–242
Orthopaedic Trauma Association Committee for Coding and Classification (1996) Fracture and dislocation compendium. J Orthap Trauma 10(Suppl 1) 1–154
Carlson DA (1998) Bicondylar fracture of the posterior aspect of the tibial plateau. A case report and a modified operative approach. J Bone Joint Surg Am 80:1049–1052
Carlson DA (2005) Posterior bicondylar tibial plateau fractures. J Orthop Trauma 19:73–78
De Coster TA, Willis MC, Marsh JL et al (1999) Rank order analysis of tibial plafond fractures: does injury or reduction predict outcome? Foot Ankle Int 20:44–49
Swiontkowski MF, Engelberg R, Martin DP et al (1999) Short musculoskeletal function assessment questionnaire: validity, reliability, and responsiveness. J Bone Joint Surg Am 81:1245–1260
Stallenberg B, Gevenois PA, Sintzoff SA Jr et al (1993) Fracture of the posterior aspect of the lateral tibial plateau: radiographic sign of anterior cruciate ligament tear. Radiology 187:821–825
Alpert JM, McCarty LP, Bach BR Jr (2008) The posterolateral corner of the knee: anatomic dissection and surgical approach. J Knee Surg 21:50–54
Trickey EL (1968) Rupture of the posterior cruciate ligament of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br 50:334–341
Tao J, Hang DH, Wang QG et al (2008) The posterolateral shearing tibial plateau fracture: treatment and results via a modified posterolateral approach. Knee 15:473–479
Lobenhoffer P, Gerich T, Bertram T et al (1997) Particular posteromedial and posterolateral approaches for the treatment of tibial head fractures. Unfallchirurg 100:957–967
Waldrop JI, Macey TI, Trettin JC et al (1988) Fractures of the posterolateral tibial plateau. Am J Sports Med 16:492–498
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chang, SM., Zheng, HP., Li, HF. et al. Treatment of isolated posterior coronal fracture of the lateral tibial plateau through posterolateral approach for direct exposure and buttress plate fixation. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 129, 955–962 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-009-0829-5
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-009-0829-5