Skip to main content
Log in

Successful use of posterior instrumented spinal fusion alone for scoliosis in 19 patients with neurofibromatosis type-1 followed up for at least 25 months

  • Orthopaedic Surgery
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Posterior instrumented fusion alone has been considered inadequate to correct scoliosis in most patients with neurofibromatosis type-1 (NF-1) because of their weak bone structure. This study was undertaken to evaluate whether the extension of fusion one level beyond the conventional fusion level would enable posterior instrumented fusion alone to be as effective as anterior–posterior fusion in treating patients with NF-1 and scoliosis who are more than 10 years old and whose scoliosis is <90°.

Methods

Nineteen patients with NF-1 were treated surgically with long, posterior instrumented fusion for scoliosis from 1998 to 2004. Among the patients, 3 had nondystrophic curves, and 16 had dystrophic curves. Posterior fusions were performed that used abundant bone grafts, and included neutral and stable vertebrae in both the coronal and sagittal planes and any coronal curves of more than 40°.

Results

The mean coronal and sagittal Cobb’s angles in the nondystrophic curves were 79° and 16° before surgery, 31° and 12° after surgery, and 37° and 15° at follow-up, respectively. In the dystrophic thoracic curves, the Cobb’s angles in the coronal and sagittal planes before and after surgery and at follow-up were 68° and 31°, 27° and 28°, and 33°and 30°, respectively. There were no cases of coronal or sagittal decompensation, neurologic complications, or infections. There were eight (42.1%) complications, three intraoperative and five late. Pseudarthrosis with instrumentation failure that required revision surgery occurred in one (5.2%) patient.

Conclusions

These results demonstrate that a satisfactory stabilization of scoliosis can be achieved by posterior fusion with instrumentation alone in patients with NF-1 who are more than 10 years old, and whose scoliosis is <90°.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Asher M, Min Lai S, Burton D (2003) The reliability and concurrent validity of the Scoliosis Research Society-22 patient questionnaire for idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 28:63–69. doi:10.1097/00007632-200301010-00015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Birch JG, Herring JA (1987) Spinal deformity in Marfan syndrome. J Pediatr Orthop 7:546–552

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Cheng I, Kim Y, Gupta MC et al (2005) Apical sublaminar wires versus pedicle screws: which provides better results for surgical correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis? Spine 30:2104–2112

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Di Silvestre M, Greggi T, Giacomini S et al (2005) Surgical treatment for scoliosis in Marfan syndrome. Spine 30:E597–E604. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000182317.33700.08

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Dubousset J, Herring JA, Shifflebarger H (1989) The crankshaft phenomenon. J Pediatr Orthop 9:541–550

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Durrani AA, Crawford AH, Choudhdry SN et al (2000) Modulation of spinal deformities in patients with neurofibromatosis type 1. Spine 25(1):69–75. doi:10.1097/00007632-200001010-00013

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ferner RE, Husln SM, Thomas N et al (2007) Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of individuals with neurofibromatosis 1. J Med Genet 44:81–88. doi:10.1136/jmg.2006.045906

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Funasaki H, Winter RB, Lonstein JB, Denis F (1994) Pathophysiology of spinal deformities in neurofibromatosis. An analysis of seventy-one patients who had curves associated with dystrophic changes. J Bone Joint Surg Am 75:692–700

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gorup Haher TR, JM Shin TM et al (1999) Results of the Scoliosis Research Society instrument for evaluation of surgical outcome in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a multi-canter study of 244 patients. Spine 24:1435–1440. doi:10.1097/00007632-199907150-00008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Halmai V, Domain J, de Jonge T, Illes T (2002) Surgical treatment of spinal deformities associatied with neurofibromatosis type 1. Report of 12 cases. J Neruosurg 97(Suppl 3):310–316

    Google Scholar 

  11. Illes T, Halmai V, de Jonge T et al (2001) Decreased bone mineral density in neurofibromatosis patients with spinal deformities. Osteoporos Int 12:823–827. doi:10.1007/s001980170032

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kim HW, Weinstein SL (1997) Spine update: the management of scoliosis in neurofibromatosis. Spine 22:2770–2776. doi:10.1097/00007632-199712010-00014

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Liljenqvist U, Hackenberg L, Link TM et al (2001) Pullout strength of pedicla screws versus pedicle and laminar hooks in the thoracic spine. Acta Orthop Belg 67:157–163

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Mitchell GE, Lourie H, Berne AS (1967) The various causes of scalloped vertebrae with notes on their pathogenesis. Radiology 89:67–74

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ogilvie JW (1995) Neurofibromatosis. In: Bradford DS (ed) Moe’s textbook of scoliosis and other spinal deformities, 3rd edn. W. B. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 337–347

  16. Parisini P, Di Silvestre M, Greggi T, Padermi S, Cervellati S, Savini R (1999) Surgical correction of dystrophic spinal cords in neurofibromatosis. A review of 56 patients. Spine 24:2247–2253. doi:10.1097/00007632-199911010-00013

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Savini R, Parisini P, Cervellati S et al (1983) Surgical treatment of vertebral deformities in neurofibromatosis. Ital J Orthop Traumatol 9:13–24

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Shen JX, Qiu GX, Wang YP, Zhao Y, Ye QB, Wu ZK (2005) Surgical treatment of scoliosis caused by neurofibromatosis type 2. Chin Med Sci J 20:88–92

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Singh K, Samartzis D, An HS (2005) Neurofibromatosis type I with severe dystrophic kyphoscoliosis and its operative management via a simultaneous anterior-posterior approach: a case report and review of the literature. Spine J 5:461–466. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2004.09.015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Theos A, Korf BR (2006) Pathophysiology of neurofibromatosis type 1. Ann Intern Med 144:842–849

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Tsirikos AI, Saifuddin A, Noordeen MH (2005) Spinal deformity in neurofibromatosis type-1: diagnosis and treatment. Eur Spine J 14:427–439. doi:10.1007/s00586-004-0829-7</jrn>

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Vandenbroucke J, van Ooy A, Geukers C et al (1997) Dystrophic kyphoscoliosis in neurofibromatosis type I: a report of two cases and review of the literature. Eur Spine J 6:273–277. doi:10.1007/BF01322451

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Winter RB, Anderson MB (1985) Spinal arthrodesis for spinal deformity using posterior instrumentation and sublaminar wiring. Int Orthop 9:239–245. doi:10.1007/BF00266510

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Winter RB, Lonstein JE, Anderson M (1988) Neurofibromatosis hyperkyphosis. A review of 33 patients with kyphosis of 80 degrees or greater. J Spinal Disord 1:39–49. doi:10.1097/00002517-198801000-00006

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest statement

No conflict of interest exists with this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiutong Fang.

Additional information

Contributions of authors: All authors meet the criteria for authorship. All authors accept full responsibility for the study, had access to the data, analyzed the data, and made the decision to publish.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Li, M., Fang, X., Li, Y. et al. Successful use of posterior instrumented spinal fusion alone for scoliosis in 19 patients with neurofibromatosis type-1 followed up for at least 25 months. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 129, 915–921 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-008-0696-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-008-0696-5

Keywords

Navigation