Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

CT-guided interventions in orthopedics

  • Orthopaedic Surgery
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

In this study we present our experience with CT-guided interventions for musculoskeletal diseases. Technical details, advantages and disadvantages and the accuracy of the method are described.

Materials and methods

Between 2002 and 2005 we performed 77 CT-guided interventions on 72 patients (42 men, mean age 43.9 ± 24.4 years, and 30 women, mean age 54.2 ± 20.3) with (suspected) fracture, tumor or infection.

Results

Forty-one tumors, metastases or bone cysts, 17 infections, 12 bone alterations (e.g. osteoporosis, fracture) and 4 joints were diagnosed or treated. In three patients a tumor or an infection could be excluded. The duration of the procedure was 29.1 ± 16.8 min. We did not see any intraoperative complication. However, the intervention had to be repeated in two patients, as the collected specimen was insufficient for histopathological evaluation in one patient, and in the other the nidus of osteoid osteoma persisted. The effective accuracy was 90.5%. Two patients were diagnosed first and then treated by screw osteosynthesis or corticoid steroid infiltration. One patient with an osteoid osteoma of the tibia fell and sustained a fracture of the tibial shaft.

Conclusion

CT-guidance can substantially support diagnostic and therapeutic procedures in bone and soft tissues, especially if located in deep areas of the body, which are difficult to reach using open approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alanen J, Keski-Nisula L, Blanco-Sequeiros R, Tervonen O (2004) Cost comparison analysis of low-field (0.23 T) MRI- and CT-guided bone biopsies. Eur Radiol 14:123–128

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Altuntas AO, Slavin J, Smith PJ, Schlict SM, Powell GJ, Ngan S, Toner G, Choong PF (2005) Accuracy of computed tomography guided core needle biopsy of musculoskeletal tumours. ANZ J Surg 75:187–191

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Banovac F, Tang J, Xu S, Lindisch D, Chung HY, Levy EB, Chang T, McCullough MF, Yaniv Z, Wood BJ, Cleary K (2005) Precision targeting of liver lesions using a novel electromagnetic navigation device in physiologic phantom and swine. Med Phys 32:2698–2705

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bauwens K, Matthes G, Wich M, Gebhard F, Hanson B, Ekkernkamp A, Stengel D (2007) Navigated total knee replacement. A meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg 89A:261–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Blake-Toker AM, Hawkins L, Nadalo L, Howard D, Arazoza A, Koonsman M, Dunn E (2001) CT guided percutaneous fixation of sacroiliac fractures in trauma patients. J Trauma 51:1117–1121

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Campanacci M, Ruggieri P, Gasbarrini A, Ferraro A, Campanacci L (1999) Osteoid osteoma: direct visual identification and intralesional excision of the nidus with minimal removal of bone. J Bone Joint Surg 81-B:814–820

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cardinal E, Chhem RK, Beauregard CG (1998) Ultrasound-guided interventional procedures in the musculoskeletal system. Radiol Clin North Am 36:597–604

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Choi JJ, Davis KW, Blankenbaker DG (2004) Percutaneous musculoskeletal biopsy. Semin Roentgenol 39:114–128

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Däcke W, Libicher M, Mädler U, Rumpf C, Bernd L (2003) Möglichkeiten mit der MRT-gesteuerten Tumorbiopsie am Bewegungsapparat. Orthopäde 32:170–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. de Mey J, Op de Beeck B, Meysman M, Noppen M, De Maeseneer M, Vanhoey M, Vincken W, Osteaux M (2000) Real time CT-fluoroscopy: diagnostic and therapeutic applications. Eur J Radiol 34:32–40

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ghelman B (1998) Biopsies of the musculoskeletal system. Radiol Clin North Am 36:567–580

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Haaga JR, Weinstein AJ (1980) CT-guided percutaneous aspiration and drainage of abscesses. Am J Roentgenol 135:1187–1194

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Haaker RG, Tiedjen K, Ottersbach A, Rubenthaler F, Stockheim M, Stiehl JB (2007) Comparison of conventional versus computer-navigated acetabular component insertion. J Arthroplasty 22:151–159

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hau A, Kim I, Kattapuram S, Hornicek FJ, Rosenberg AE, Gebhardt MC, Mankin HJ (2002) Accuracy of CT-guided biopsies in 359 patients with musculoskeletal lesions. Skeletal Radiol 31:349–353

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Honl M, Schwieger K, Salineros M, Jacobs J, Morlock M, Wimmer M (2006) Orientation of the acetabular component. A comparison of five navigation systems with conventional surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg 88B:1401–1405

    Google Scholar 

  16. Jamshidi K, Swaim WR (1971) Bone marrow biopsy with unaltered architecture: a new biopsy device. J Lab Clin Med 77:335–342

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kahn T, Schmidt F, Modder U (1999) MR-geführte Eingriffe. Radiologe 39:741–749

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Matziolis G, Krocker D, Weiss U, Tohtz S, Perka C (2007) A prospective, randomized study of computer-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty. Three-dimensional evaluation of implant alignment and rotation. J Bone Joint Surg 89A:236–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Möller S, Kothe R, Wiesner L, Werner M, Rüther W, Delling G (2001) Fluoroscopy-guided transpedicular trocar biopsy of the spine-results, review, and technical notes. Acta Orthop Belg 67:488–499

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Neuerburg JM, Adam G, Hunter D (1997) New Trends in Musculoskeletal Interventional Radiology: Percutaneous, MR_Guided Skeletal Biopsy. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 1:339–348

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Özerdemoglu RA, Thompson RC Jr, Transfeldt EE, Cheng EY (2003) Diagnostic value of open and needle biopsies in tumors of the sacrum. Spine 28:909–915

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Poggi G, Gatti C, Melazzini M, Bernardo G, Strada M, Teragni C, Delmonte A, Tagliaferri C, Bonezzi C, Barbieri M, Bernardo A, Fratino P (2003) Percutaneous ultrasound-guided radiofrequency thermal ablation of malignant osteolyses. Anticancer Res 23(6D):4977–4983

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Pramesh CS, Deshpande MS, Pardiwala DN, Agarwal MG, Puri A (2001) Core needle biopsy for bone tumours. Eur J Surg Oncol 27:668–671

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Roberts CC, Morrison WB, Leslie KO, Carrino JA, Lozevski JL, Liu PT (2005) Assessment of bone biopsy needles for sample size, specimen quality and ease of use. Skeletal Radiol 34:329–335

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Röderer G, Nelitz M, Puhl W, Huch K (2004) Minimal-invasive Therapie des Osteoidosteoms. Z Orthop 142:456–461

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Schiemann M, Killmann R, Kleen M, Abolmaali N, Finney J, Vogl TJ (2004) Vascular guide wire navigation with a magnetic guidance system: experimental results in a phantom. Radiology 232:475–481

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Simon MA (1982) Biopsy of musculoskeletal tumors. Current Concepts Review. J Bone Joint Surg 64A:1253–1275

    Google Scholar 

  28. Thanos L, Mylona S, Kalioras V, Pomoni M, Batakis N (2004) Percutaneous CT-guided interventional procedures in musculoskeletal system (our experience). Eur J Radiol 50:273–277

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. van Walsum T, van de Kraats EB, Voormolen MH, Verlaan JJ, Mali WP, Niessen WJ (2006) Navigation with three-dimensional rotational radiographic data for transpedicular percutaneous needle introduction: feasibility and comparison with fluoroscopic guidance. J Vasc Interv Radiol 17:1511–1518

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Welker JA, Henshaw RM, Jelinek J, Shmookler BM, Malawer MM (2000) The percutaneous needle biopsy is safe and recommended in the diagnosis of musculoskeletal masses. Cancer 89:2677–2686

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Wood BJ, Zhang H, Durrani A, Glossop N, Ranjan S, Lindisch D, Levy E, Banovac F, Borgert J, Krueger S, Kruecker J, Viswanathan A, Cleary K (2005) Navigation with electromagnetic tracking for interventional radiology procedures: a feasibility study. J Vasc Interv Radiol 16:493–505

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Yao L, Nelson SD, Seeger LL, Eckardt JJ, Eilber FR (1999) Primary musculoskeletal neoplasms: effectiveness of core-needle biopsy. Radiology 212:682–686

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Histopathological evaluation was performed by the Institute of Osteopathology, University of Hamburg (former Director: Prof. Dr. G. Delling) or the Institute of Pathology, University of Ulm (Director: Prof. Dr. P. Möller).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Klaus Huch.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Huch, K., Röderer, G., Ulmar, B. et al. CT-guided interventions in orthopedics. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 127, 677–683 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-007-0410-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-007-0410-z

Keywords

Navigation