Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Infection prophylaxis: a prospective study in 106 patients operated on by tibial osteotomy using the hemicallotasis technique

  • Trauma Surgery
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Tibial osteotomy by the hemicallotasis technique is a clean elective operation. With external fixation pins inserted, close to the knee joint, the infection prophylaxis should be considered. The primary aim was to investigate the differences in the postoperative use of antibiotics during the time in external fixation between administrating prophylactic antibiotics for 3 days or as a single dose in patients operated on by the hemicallotasis technique for knee deformities. Secondary aims were to study the differences in pin-site infection rate and grade and complications.

Material and methods

A total of 106 consecutive patients of mean age 52 years (range 18–69) operated on by the hemicallotasis technique for knee deformities were included in this prospective study. Sixty patients were prescribed prophylactic antibiotics for 3 days and 46 patients as a single dose. Chlorhexidine (5 mg/ml) in alcohol (70% ethanol) was used as cleansing agent in the pin-site care. The power of the study was calculated to 80% to detect a difference in the postoperative use of antibiotics for 7 days during the treatment in external fixation.

Results

There were no differences in postoperative use of antibiotics between 3 days administration or a single dose of prophylactic antibiotics. This was the case with infection rate and grade, positive bacterial cultures, presence of Staphylococcus aureus, nor positive culturing from the tip of the pins at removal. Neither were there any differences in numbers of loose pins and complications.

Conclusion

There were no differences between 3 days of administration of prophylactic antibiotics and one single dose. One single dose of prophylactic antibiotics is appropriate together with a pin-site concept preventing pin-site infection in patients operated on by hemicallotasis osteotomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mazza A (2000) Ceftriaxone as short-term antibiotic prophylaxis in orthopedic surgery: a cost-benefit analysis involving 808 patients. J Chemother 12(Suppl 3):29–33

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Barie PS (2000) Modern surgical antibiotic prophylaxis and therapy—less is more. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 1:23–29

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Esposito S (1999) Is single-dose antibiotic prophylaxis sufficient for any surgical procedure? J Chemother 11:556–564

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Schmidt-Matthiesen A, Roding H, Windolf J, Sommerfeldt D, Pannike A, Encke Al (1999) A prospective, randomised comparison of single- vs. multiple-dose antibiotic prophylaxis in penetrating trauma. Chemotherapy 45:380–391

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Wittmann DH, Schein M (1996) Let us shorten antibiotic prophylaxis and therapy in surgery. Am J Surg 172:26S–32S

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Strachan CJ (1993) Antibiotic prophylaxis in peripheral vascular and orthopaedic prosthetic surgery. J Antimicrob Chemother 31(Suppl B):65–78

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Magyar G, Ahl TL, Vibe P, Toksvig-Larsen S, Lindstrand A (1999) Open-wedge osteotomy by hemicallotasis or the closed-wedge technique for osteoarthritis of the knee: a randomised study of 50 operations. J Bone Joint Surg Br 81:444–448

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gyssens IC (1999) Preventing postoperative infections: current treatment recommendations. Drugs 57:175–185

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. W-Dahl A, Toksvig-Larsen S, Lindstrand A (2003) No difference between daily and weekly pin site care: a randomized study of 50 patients with external fixation. Acta Orthop Scand 74:704–708

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. W-Dahl A, Toksvig-Larsen S (2004) Pin site care in external fixation sodium chloride or chlorhexidine solution as a cleansing agent. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 124:555–558

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Checketts RG, Moran CG, Mac Eachern AG, Otterburn M (1999) Pin track infecktion and the principles of pin site care. In: De Bastiani G, Graham Apley A, Goldberg A (eds) Orthofix external fixation in trauma and orthopeadics. Springer, London Berlin Heidelberg, pp 97–103

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hosmer D, Lemeshow S. (1989) Applied logistic regression. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  13. Greenland S. (1994) Modeling and variable selection in epidemiologic analysis. Am J Public Health 79:340–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wilson AP, Livesey SA, Treasure T, Gruneberg RN, Sturridge MF (1987) Factors predisposing to wound infection in cardiac surgery: a prospective study of 517 patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1:158–164

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Anielski R, Barczynski M (1998) Postoperative wound infections. I. Population data and risk factors. Przegl Lek 55:101–108

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Smilanich RP, Bonnet I, Kirkpatrick JR (1995) Contaminated wounds: the effect of initial management on outcome. Am Surg 61:427–430

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Moller AM, Pedersen T, Villebro N, Munksgaard A (2003) Effect of smoking on early complications after elective orthopedic surgery. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 85-B:178–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Moller AM, Villebro N, Pedersen T, Tonnesen H (2002) Effect of preoperative smoking intervention on postoperative complications: a randomised clinical trial. Lancet 359:114–117

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. W-Dahl A, Toksvig-Larsen S (2004) Cigarett smoking delays bone healing: a prospective study of 200 patients operated on by the hemicallotasis technique. Acta Orthop Scand 75:347–351

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Polk HC Jr, Christmas AB (2000). Prophylactic antibiotics in surgery and surgical wound infections. Am Surg 66:105–111

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Galandiuk S, Polk HC Jr, Jagelman DG, Fazio VW (1989) Re-emphasis of priorities in surgical antibiotic prophylaxis. Surg Gynecol Obstet 169:219–222

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Weale AE, Lee AS, MacEachern AG (2001) High tibial osteotomy using a dynamic axial external fixator. Clin Orthop 154–167

  23. Magyar G, Toksvig-Larsen S, Lindstrand A (1998) Open wedge tibial osteotomy by callus distraction in gonarthrosis: operative technique and early results in 36 patients. Acta Orthop Scand 69:147–151

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Mangram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson ML, Silver LC, Jarvis WR (1999) Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection, 1999. Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 20:250–278 (quiz 279–280)

  25. Nakamura E, Mizuta H, Kudo S, Takagi K, Sakamoto K (2001) Open-wedge osteotomy of the proximal tibia hemicallotasis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 83:1111–1115

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopedics, University Hospital, 221 85 , Lund, Sweden

    Annette W-Dahl & Sören Toksvig-Larsen

Authors
  1. Annette W-Dahl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sören Toksvig-Larsen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Annette W-Dahl.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

W-Dahl, A., Toksvig-Larsen, S. Infection prophylaxis: a prospective study in 106 patients operated on by tibial osteotomy using the hemicallotasis technique. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 126, 441–447 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-006-0165-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-006-0165-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation