Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Tumors of the pelvis: complications after reconstruction

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Complications after pelvic sarcoma surgery are frequent; however, the reports on complications are limited. Results of the authors' experience with 110 primary pelvic tumor resections and methods to achieve low complication rates for pelvic reconstruction are reported.

Materials and methods

From 1982 to 1996, 110 patients with pelvic sarcoma (42 Ewing sarcomas, 40 chondrosarcomas, 21 osteosarcomas, and 7 other malignant tumors) underwent surgery. Sixteen patients underwent implantation of a hemipelvic megaprosthesis, 13 patients had implantation of an allograft for sacroiliac arthrodesis, 12 patients had implantation of an autograft for sacroiliac arthrodesis, and 17 patients underwent hip transposition. There were 9 hindquarter amputations, 6 implantations of allograft and total hip endoprosthesis, 1 implantation of prosthesis with autograft, and 1 implantation of allograft and autograft. No skeletal reconstruction was done in 35 patients.

Results

Postoperative function was as follows: 37% in patients with prosthesis, 60% in allograft, 66% in autograft, 66% in hip transposition, 37% in amputation, and 79% without reconstruction. In total, 10/16 patients with prosthetic replacement, 9/13 with allograft implantation, 4/12 with autograft implantation, 7/17 with hip transposition, 5/9 with amputation, 6/6 with prosthesis and allograft, and 12/35 without skeletal reconstruction had complications. Frequent complications depending on the reconstruction were infection in 6/10 prostheses and in 5/13 allografts, leg length discrepancy in 2/12 autografts and 4/17 hip transpositions, hematoma in 3/9 amputations, and infection (6) and skin problems (5) in 6 prostheses with allograft.

Conclusion

Because of the small number of complications and good function, autograft implantation after iliac resection and hip transposition after acetabular resection are advisable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ahrens S, Hoffmann C, Jabar S, Braun-Munzinger G, Paulussen M, Dunst J, Rube C, Winkelmann W, Heinecke A, Gobel U, Winkler K, Harms D, Treuner J, Jurgens H (1999) Evaluation of prognostic factors in a tumor volume-adapted treatment strategy for localized Ewing sarcoma of bone: the CESS 86 experience. Cooperative Ewing Sarcoma Study. Med Pediatr Oncol 32:186–195

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bielack S, Kempf-Bielack B, Schwenzer D, Birkfellner T, Delling G, Ewerbeck V, Exner GU, Fuchs N, Gobel U, Graf N, Heise U, Helmke K, Hochstetter ARvon , Jurgens H, Maas R, Munchow N, Salzer-Kuntschik M, Treuner J, Veltmann U, Werner M, Winkelmann W, Zoubek A, Kotz R (1999) Neoadjuvant therapy for localized osteosarcoma of extremities. Results from the Cooperative osteosarcoma study group COSS of 925 patients (in German). Klin Padiatr 211:260–270

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Campanacci M, Capanna R (1991) Pelvic resections: the Rizzoli Institute experience. Orthop Clin North Am 22:65–86

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Enneking WF (1987) Modification of the system for functional evaluation of surgical management of musculoskeletal tumors. In: Enneking WF (ed) Limb salvage in musculoskeletal oncology. Bristol-Myers/Zimmer Orthopaedic Symposium. Churchill-Livingstone, New York, pp 626–682

  5. Enneking WF, Dunham W, Gebhardt MC, Malawar M, Pritchard DJ (1993) A system for the functional evaluation of reconstructive procedures after surgical treatment of tumors of the musculoskeletal system. Clin Orthop 286:241–246

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gradinger R, Rechl H, Hipp E (1991) Pelvic osteosarcoma. Resection, reconstruction, local control, and survival statistics. Clin Orthop 270:149–158

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Johnson JT (1978) Reconstruction of the pelvic ring following tumor resection. J Bone Joint Surg Am 60:747–751

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Nielsen HK, Veth RP, Oldhoff J, Koops HS, Scales JT (1985) Resection of a peri-acetabular chondrosarcoma and reconstruction of the pelvis. A case report. J Bone Joint Surg Br 67:413–415

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. O'Connor MI, Sim FH (1989) Salvage of the limb in the treatment of malignant pelvic tumors. J Bone Joint Surg Am 71:481–494

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ozaki T, Hillmann A, Bettin D, Wuisman P, Winkelmann W (1996) High complication rates with pelvic allografts. Experience of 22 sarcoma resections. Acta Orthop Scand 67:333–338

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ozaki T, Hillmann A, Lindner N, Blasius S, Winkelmann W (1997) Chondrosarcoma of the pelvis. Clin Orthop :226–239

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ozaki T, Hillmann A, Winkelmann W (1998) Treatment outcome of pelvic sarcomas in young children: orthopaedic and oncologic analysis. J Pediatr Orthop 18:350–355

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Stephenson RB, Kaufer H, Hankin FM (1989) Partial pelvic resection as an alternative to hindquarter amputation for skeletal neoplasms. Clin Orthop 242:201–211

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Uchida A, Myoui A, Araki N, Yoshikawa H, Ueda T, Aoki Y (1996) Prosthetic reconstruction for periacetabular malignant tumors. Clin Orthop 326:238–245

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. Ozaki.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hillmann, A., Hoffmann, C., Gosheger, G. et al. Tumors of the pelvis: complications after reconstruction. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 123, 340–344 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-003-0543-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-003-0543-7

Keywords

Navigation