Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Endokarditisprophylaxe

Epidemiologie vs. individuelles Schicksal

Endocarditis prophylaxis

Epidemiology versus individual fate

  • Evidenzbasierte Medizin
  • Published:
Zeitschrift für Herz-,Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie Aims and scope

Zusammenfassung

Endokarditiden sind trotz moderner medikamentöser und chirurgischer Behandlungsstrategien gefährliche Erkrankungen mit nach wie vor hoher Morbidität und Mortalität. Dies gilt insbesondere für Prothesenendokarditiden. Die aktuelle Endokarditisleitlinie der European Society of Cardiology (ESC) aus dem Jahr 2015 sieht einen restriktiven Einsatz der Antibiotikaprophylaxe vor, da eine Zunahme resistenter Bakterienstämme durch den allzu liberalen Einsatz von Antibiotika befürchtet wird. Tatsächlich sind die Anteile multiresistenter Keime auf deutschen Intensivstationen rückläufig, während die Anzahl der Endokarditiden stetig steigt. Angesichts der exzeptionell hohen individuellen Risiken einer Endokarditis sollte die Prophylaxe wieder auf weitere Risikogruppen ausgeweitet werden. Hierzu zählen Dialysepatienten, Träger elektronischer Devices, immunsupprimierte Patienten und Patienten mit anderen Risikoszenarien einer Bakteriämie, wie fieberhaften Infektionen. Dies gilt auch im Licht der uneinheitlichen Datenlage und der unsicheren Evidenz zur Begrenzung des Antibiotikaeinsatzes bei der Endokarditisprävention. Das individuelle Patientenschicksal ist gegen eine rein epidemiologische Betrachtung abzuwägen.

Abstract

Infective endocarditis continues to be a dangerous disease with persistently high morbidity and mortality despite current conservative and surgical treatment strategies. This is especially true for infections of an implanted valvular prosthesis. The current European Society of Cardiology (ESC) endocarditis guidelines published in 2015 recommend a restricted antibiotic prophylaxis for endocarditis because it is feared that an all too liberal use of antibiotic drugs may increase the percentage of multidrug-resistant strains of bacteria. The proportion of multidrug-resistant bacteria in German intensive care units is, however, steadily decreasing whereas the proportion of endocarditis is continuously rising. In view of the exceptionally high individual risks of endocarditis, the prophylaxis should be extended to include other risk groups. These include dialysis patients, wearers of electronic devices, immunosuppressed patients and patients with other risk scenarios for bacteremia, such as febrile infections. This is also true in light of the heterogeneous data and the unsure body of evidence regarding restricted use of antibiotics for the prevention of endocarditis. The individual patient risk should be balanced against a purely epidemiological consideration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3
Abb. 4
Abb. 5

Literatur

  1. Farag M, Borst T, Sabashnikov A, Zeriouh M, Schmack B, Arif R, Beller CJ, Popov AF, Kallenbach K, Ruhparwar A, Dohmen PM, Szabó G, Karck M, Weymann A (2017) Surgery for infective endocarditis: outcomes and predictors of mortality in 360 consecutive patients. Med Sci Monit 23:3617–3626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Luciani N, Mossuto E, Ricci D, Luciani M, Russo M, Salsano A, Pozzoli A, Pierri MD, D’Onofrio A, Chiariello GA, Glieca F, Canziani A, Rinaldi M, Nardi P, Milazzo V, Trecarichi EM, Santini F, De Bonis M, Torracca L, Bizzotto E, Tumbarello M (2017) Prosthetic valve endocarditis: predictors of early outcome of surgical therapy. A multicentric study. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 52(4):768–774. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezx169

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Olsen NT, De Backer O, Thyregod HG, Vejlstrup N, Bundgaard H, Søndergaard L, Ihlemann N (2015) Prosthetic valve endocarditis after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.114.001939

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Dayer MJ, Jones S, Prendergast B, Baddour LM, Lockhart PB, Thornhill MH (2015) Incidence of infective endocarditis in England, 2000–13: a secular trend, interrupted time-series analysis. Lancet 385(9974):1219–1228. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62007-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Danchin N, Duval X, Leport C (2005) Prophylaxis of infective endocarditis: French recommendations 2002. Heart 91(6):715–718

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Thornhill MH, Dayer MJ, Forde JM, Corey GR, Chu VH, Couper DJ, Lockhart PB (2011) Impact of the NICE guideline recommending cessation of antibiotic prophylaxis for prevention of infective endocarditis: before and after study. BMJ 342:d2392. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d2392

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Pasquali SK, He X, Mohamad Z, McCrindle BW, Newburger JW, Li JS, Shah SS (2012) Trends in endocarditis hospitalizations at US children’s hospitals: impact of the 2007 American Heart Association Antibiotic Prophylaxis Guidelines. Am Heart J 163(5):894–899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2012.03.002

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. DeSimone DC et al (2012) Incidence of infective endocarditis due to Viridans group Streptococci before and after the 2007 American Heart Association’s prevention guidelines: an extended evaluation of the Olmsted County, Minnesota, population and nationwide inpatient sample. Circulation 126(1):60–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Duval X, Delahaye F, Alla F, Tattevin P, Obadia JF, Le Moing V, Doco-Lecompte T, Celard M, Poyart C, Strady C, Chirouze C, Bes M, Cambau E, Iung B, Selton-Suty C, Hoen B, AEPEI Study Group. (2012) Temporal trends in infective endocarditis in the context of prophylaxis guideline modifications: three successive population-based surveys. J Am Coll Cardiol 59(22):1968–1976. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2012.02.029

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Pant S, Patel NJ, Deshmukh A, Golwala H, Patel N, Badheka A, Hirsch GA, Mehta JL (2015) Trends in infective endocarditis incidence, microbiology, and valve replacement in the United States from 2000 to 2011. J Am Coll Cardiol 65(19):2070–2076. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2015.03.518

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ernährung und Gesundheit, Zehn Fakten zu MRSA in der Nutztierhaltung (2015) agrarheute. https://www.agrarheute.com/land-leben/zehn-fakten-mrsa-nutztierhaltung-512579. Zugegriffen: 2. Jan. 2018

  12. Cuny C et al (2016) Bedeutung der bei landwirtschaftlichen Nutztieren nachgewiesenen Livestock-assoziierten Methicillin-resistenten Staphylococcus aureus (LA-MRSA) für den Menschen. Robert Koch Institut. https://www.rki.de/DE/Content/Infekt/Antibiotikaresistenz/LA_MRSA_und_ESBL.html. Zugegriffen: 2. Jan. 2018

  13. Erfolgsgeschichte: Erneut weniger Antibiotika in der Tierhaltung eingesetzt, in: ISN Interessengemeinschaft der Schweinehalter Deutschlands e.V., 2017. https://www.schweine.net/news/weniger-antibiotika-in-tierhaltung-eingesetzt.html. Zugegriffen: 2. Jan. 2018

  14. Ostovar R, Filip T, Sukhbaatar S, Schröter F, Claus T, Erb M, Albes JM (accepted) Endocarditis: An ever increasing problem in cardiac surgery. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg

  15. Habib G, Lancellotti P, Antunes MJ et al (2015) ESC Guidelines for the management of infective endocarditis: The Task Force for the Management of Infective Endocarditis of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Endorsed by: European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS), the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM). Eur Heart J 36(44):3075–3128. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehv319

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Robert Koch-Institut (2016) Epidemiologisches Bulletin. Aktuelle Daten und Informationen zu Infektionskrankheiten und Public Health. 6. Juni 2016/Nr. 22. http://edoc.rki.de/documents/rki_fv/reg36tLNuIkFY/PDF/328OCOjVvKiW6.pdf. Zugegriffen: 2. Jan. 2018

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hil (2017) Noch immer zu viele Antibiotikaverordnungen in Deutschland. https://www.aerzteblatt.de/nachrichten/83542/Noch-immer-zu-viele-Antibiotikaverordnungen-in-Deutschland. Zugegriffen: 2. Jan. 2018

  18. DART 2020: Deutsche Antibiotika-Resistenzstrategie, Bundesministerium für Gesundheit (2017) https://www.bundesgesundheitsministerium.de/themen/praevention/antibiotika-resistenzen/antibiotika-resistenzstrategie.html. Zugegriffen: 3. Jan. 2018

  19. RESIST-Resistenzvermeidung durch adäquaten Antibiotikaeinsatz, VDEK, Die Ersatzkassen (2017) https://www.vdek.com/fokus/innovationsfonds/Resist.html. Zugegriffen: 3. Jan. 2018

  20. ABS Antibiotic Stewardship (2017) http://www.antibiotic-stewardship.de/. Zugegriffen: 3. Jan. 2018

  21. Leither MD, Shroff GR, Ding S, Gilbertson DT, Herzog CA (2013) Long-term survival of dialysis patients with bacterial endocarditis undergoing valvular replacement surgery in the United States. Circulation 128(4):344–351. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.002365

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Alagna L, Park LP, Nicholson BP, Keiger AJ, Strahilevitz J, Morris A, Wray D, Gordon D, Delahaye F, Edathodu J, Miró JM, Fernández-Hidalgo N, Nacinovich FM, Shahid R, Woods CW, Joyce MJ, Sexton DJ, Chu VH (2014) Repeat endocarditis: analysis of risk factors based on the international collaboration on endocarditis—prospective cohort study. Clin Microbiol Infect 20(6):566–575. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-0691.12395

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Rocha A, Castro R, Santos J (2015) Endocarditis and spondylodiscitis associated with tunneled cuffed hemodialysis catheters: hospitalizations with poor outcomes. Int J Artif Organs 38(4):173–177. https://doi.org/10.5301/ijao.5000401

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Farrington DK, Kilgo PD, Thourani VH, Jacob JT, Steinberg JP (2016) High risk of prosthetic valve endocarditis and death after valve replacement operations in dialysis patients. Ann Thorac Surg 101(6):2217–2223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.11.017

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Lalani T, Chu VH, Park LP, Cecchi E, Corey GR, Durante-Mangoni E, Fowler VG Jr, Gordon D, Grossi P, Hannan M, Hoen B, Muñoz P, Rizk H, Kanj SS, Selton-Suty C, Sexton DJ, Spelman D, Ravasio V, Tripodi MF, Wang A, International Collaboration on Endocarditis—Prospective Cohort Study Investigators (2013) In-hospital and 1‑year mortality in patients undergoing early surgery for prosthetic valve endocarditis. JAMA Intern Med 173(16):1495–1504. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.8203

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Sandoe JA, Barlow G, Chambers JB, Gammage M, Guleri A, Howard P, Olson E, Perry JD, Prendergast BD, Spry MJ, Steeds RP, Tayebjee MH, Watkin R, British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, British Heart Rhythm Society, British Cardiovascular Society, British Heart Valve Society, British Society for Echocardiography (2015) Guidelines for the diagnosis, prevention and management of implantable cardiac electronic device infection. Report of a joint Working Party project on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (BSAC, host organization), British Heart Rhythm Society (BHRS), British Cardiovascular Society (BCS), British Heart Valve Society (BHVS) and British Society for Echocardiography (BSE). J Antimicrob Chemother 70(2):325–359. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dku383

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Polyzos KA, Konstantelias AA, Falagas ME (2015) Risk factors for cardiac implantable electronic device infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Europace 17(5):767–777. https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euv053

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Lung B, Doco-Lecompte T, Chocron S, Strady C, Delahaye F, Le Moing V, Poyart C, Alla F, Cambau E, Tattevin P, Chirouze C, Obadia JF, Duval X, Hoen B, AEPEI Study Group (2016) Cardiac surgery during the acute phase of infective endocarditis: discrepancies between European Society of Cardiology guidelines and practices. Eur Heart J 37(10):840–848. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehv650

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Tubiana S, Blotière PO, Hoen B, Lesclous P, Millot S, Rudant J, Weill A, Coste J, Alla F, Duval X (2017) Dental procedures, antibiotic prophylaxis, and endocarditis among people with prosthetic heart valves: nationwide population based cohort and a case crossover study. BMJ 358:j3776. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j3776

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Mirabel M, Sonneville R, Hajage D, Novy E, Tubach F, Vignon P, Perez P, Lavoué S, Kouatchet A, Pajot O, Mekontso-Dessap A, Tonnelier JM, Bollaert PE, Frat JP, Navellou JC, Hyvernat H, Hssain AA, Timsit JF, Megarbane B, Wolff M, Trouillet JL, ENDOREA Study Group (2014) Long-term outcomes and cardiac surgery in critically ill patients with infective endocarditis. Eur Heart J 35(18):1195–1204. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/eht303

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Bakthavatchalam YD, Nabarro LE, Veeraraghavan B (2017) Evolving rapid Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus detection: cover all the bases. J Glob Infect Dis 9(1):18–22. https://doi.org/10.4103/0974-777X.199997

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. M. Albes MBA.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

J.M. Albes gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Dieser Beitrag beinhaltet keine vom Autor durchgeführten Studien an Menschen oder Tieren.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Albes, J.M. Endokarditisprophylaxe. Z Herz- Thorax- Gefäßchir 32, 492–501 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00398-018-0233-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00398-018-0233-y

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation