Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Variations on classification of main types of myocardial infarction: a systematic review and outcome meta-analysis

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Clinical Research in Cardiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

Classifying myocardial infarction into type 1 (T1MI) or type 2 (T2MI) remains a challenge in clinical practice. We aimed to identify factors contributing to variation in the classifications of MI into type 1 or type 2. In addition, pooled analyses of long-term mortality and reinfarction outcomes were performed.

Methods

We searched Medline, Embase and Web of Science through January 2018 for observational studies or clinical trials classifying patients as either T1MI or T2MI. Studies with baseline characteristics allowing a comparison between both groups were included. Inverse variance random-effects models were used to pool risk ratios (RR).

Results

Overall, 93,194 patients from 20 included observational studies were classified as T1MI and 9291 as T2MI; corresponding to 87.9% and 8.8% of all patients diagnosed with MI. Inclusion of ST-elevation MI patients was inconsistent among studies. Coronary angiography was performed in 77.7% and 31.5% of all patients with T1MI and T2MI, respectively. From a subgroup of 11 studies, percutaneous coronary intervention was performed in 79.2% of all patients classified as T1MI (range 44.2–93.0%) and 40.2% of all T2MI patients (range 0–87.5%). A meta-analysis of 6 studies (44,366 in total) on 2-year mortality showed worse outcome among T2MI patients (RR: 1.52, CI 1.07–2.17, P = 0.02; I2 = 92%). Risk of reinfarction at 1.6 years was higher among T2MI patients (RR: 1.68, CI 1.22–2.31, P = 0.001; I2 = 9%).

Conclusions

Classification of T1MI and T2MI varies widely among studies. A standardized approach with clear definitions is needed to avoid misclassification and ensure appropriate patient management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, Simoons ML, Chaitman BR, White HD; Joint ESC/ACCF/AHA/WHF Task Force for Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction; Authors/Task Force Members Chairpersons, Thygesen K, Alpert JS, White HD; Biomarker Subcommittee, Jaffe AS, Katus HA, Apple FS, Lindahl B, Morrow DA; ECG Subcommittee, Chaitman BR, Clemmensen PM, Johanson P, Hod H; Imaging Subcommittee, Underwood R, Bax JJ, Bonow JJ, Pinto F, Gibbons RJ; Classification Subcommittee, Fox KA, Atar D, Newby LK, Galvani M, Hamm CW; Intervention Subcommittee, Uretsky BF, Steg PG, Wijns W, Bassand JP, Menasche P, Ravkilde J; Trials & Registries Subcommittee, Ohman EM, Antman EM, Wallentin LC, Armstrong PW, Simoons ML; Trials & Registries Subcommittee, Januzzi JL, Nieminen MS, Gheorghiade M, Filippatos G; Trials & Registries Subcommittee, Luepker RV, Fortmann SP, Rosamond WD, Levy D, Wood D; Trials & Registries Subcommittee, Smith SC, Hu D, Lopez-Sendon JL, Robertson RM, Weaver D, Tendera M, Bove AA, Parkhomenko AN, Vasilieva EJ, Mendis S; ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines (CPG), Bax JJ, Baumgartner H, Ceconi C, Dean V, Deaton C, Fagard R, Funck-Brentano C, Hasdai D, Hoes A, Kirchhof P, Knuuti J, Kolh P, McDonagh T, Moulin C, Popescu BA, Reiner Z, Sechtem U, Sirnes PA, Tendera M, Torbicki A, Vahanian A, Windecker S; Document Reviewers, Morais J, Aguiar C, Almahmeed W, Arnar DO, Barili F, Bloch KD, Bolger AF, Botker HE, Bozkurt B, Bugiardini R, Cannon C, de Lemos J, Eberli FR, Escobar E, Hlatky M, James S, Kern KB, Moliterno DJ, Mueller C, Neskovic AN, Pieske BM, Schulman SP, Storey RF, Taubert KA, Vranckx P, Wagner DR (2012) Third universal definition of myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 60(16):1581–1598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2012.08.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, Chaitman BR, Bax JJ, Morrow DA, White HD, Group ESC Scientific Document Group (2018) Fourth universal definition of myocardial infarction (2018). Eur Heart J. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehy462

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. White HD, Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS (2014) Clinical implications of the third universal definition of myocardial infarction. Heart 100(5):424–432. https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2012-302976

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Nagele P (2016) The case for a revised definition of myocardial infarction-resolving the ambiguity of type 2 myocardial infarction. JAMA Cardiol 1(3):247–248. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamacardio.2016.0511

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Alpert JS, Thygesen KA, White HD, Jaffe AS (2014) Diagnostic and therapeutic implications of type 2 myocardial infarction: review and commentary. Am J Med 127(2):105–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2013.09.031

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Collinson P, Lindahl B (2015) Type 2 myocardial infarction: the chimaera of cardiology? Heart 101(21):1697–1703. https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2014-307122

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Baron T, Hambraeus K, Sundstrom J, Erlinge D, Jernberg T, Lindahl B, Total-AMI study group (2015) Type 2 myocardial infarction in clinical practice. Heart 101 (2):101–106. https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2014-306093

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Baron T, Hambraeus K, Sundstrom J, Erlinge D, Jernberg T, Lindahl B, Total-AMI study group (2016) Impact on long-term mortality of presence of obstructive coronary artery disease and classification of myocardial infarction. Am J Med 129(4):398–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2015.11.035

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lopez-Cuenca A, Gomez-Molina M, Flores-Blanco PJ, Sanchez-Martinez M, Garcia-Narbon A, De Las Heras-Gomez I, Sanchez-Galian MJ, Guerrero-Perez E, Valdes M, Manzano-Fernandez S (2016) Comparison between type-2 and type-1 myocardial infarction: clinical features, treatment strategies and outcomes. J Geriatr Cardiol 13(1):15–22. https://doi.org/10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2016.01.014

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. National Heart Lung and Blood Institute (2017) Quality assessment tool for observational cohort and cross-sectional studies. https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health-topics/study-quality-assessment-tools. Accessed Mar 2018

  11. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Group P (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ 339:b2535. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2535

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, Olkin I, Williamson GD, Rennie D, Moher D, Becker BJ, Sipe TA, Thacker SB (2000) Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA 283(15):2008–2012

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sandoval Y, Smith SW, Schulz KM, Murakami MM, Love SA, Nicholson J, Apple FS (2015) Diagnosis of type 1 and type 2 myocardial infarction using a high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I assay with sex-specific 99th percentiles based on the third universal definition of myocardial infarction classification system. Clin Chem 61(4):657–663. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2014.236638

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Javed U, Aftab W, Ambrose JA, Wessel RJ, Mouanoutoua M, Huang G, Barua RS, Weilert M, Sy F, Thatai D (2009) Frequency of elevated troponin I and diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 104(1):9–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.03.003

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gonzalez MA, Eilen DJ, Marzouq RA, Porterfield CP, Hazarika S, Nasir S, Patel AA, Gonzalez Kde J, Burris MB, Prieto-Gonzalez M, Rose JD, Cascio WE, Multidisciplinary Atherosclerosis Prevention P (2011) The universal classification is an independent predictor of long-term outcomes in acute myocardial infarction. Cardiovasc Revasc Med 12(1):35–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2009.11.006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Saaby L, Poulsen TS, Hosbond S, Larsen TB, Pyndt Diederichsen AC, Hallas J, Thygesen K, Mickley H (2013) Classification of myocardial infarction: frequency and features of type 2 myocardial infarction. Am J Med 126(9):789–797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2013.02.029

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Saaby L, Poulsen TS, Diederichsen AC, Hosbond S, Larsen TB, Schmidt H, Gerke O, Hallas J, Thygesen K, Mickley H (2014) Mortality rate in type 2 myocardial infarction: observations from an unselected hospital cohort. Am J Med 127(4):295–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2013.12.020

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Stein GY, Herscovici G, Korenfeld R, Matetzky S, Gottlieb S, Alon D, Gevrielov-Yusim N, Iakobishvili Z, Fuchs S (2014) Type-II myocardial infarction—patient characteristics, management and outcomes. PLoS One 9(1):e84285. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084285

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Sandoval Y, Thordsen SE, Smith SW, Schulz KM, Murakami MM, Pearce LA, Apple FS (2014) Cardiac troponin changes to distinguish type 1 and type 2 myocardial infarction and 180-day mortality risk. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care 3(4):317–325. https://doi.org/10.1177/2048872614538411

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Paiva L, Providencia R, Barra S, Dinis P, Faustino AC, Goncalves L (2015) Universal definition of myocardial infarction: clinical insights. Cardiology 131(1):13–21. https://doi.org/10.1159/000371739

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Shah AS, McAllister DA, Mills R, Lee KK, Churchhouse AM, Fleming KM, Layden E, Anand A, Fersia O, Joshi NV, Walker S, Jaffe AS, Fox KA, Newby DE, Mills NL (2015) Sensitive troponin assay and the classification of myocardial infarction. Am J Med 128(5):493–501 e493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2014.10.056

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Meigher S, Thode HC, Peacock WF, Bock JL, Gruberg L, Singer AJ (2016) Causes of elevated cardiac troponins in the emergency department and their associated mortality. Acad Emerg Med 23(11):1267–1273. https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.13033

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Cediel G, Gonzalez-Del-Hoyo M, Carrasquer A, Sanchez R, Boque C, Bardaji A (2017) Outcomes with type 2 myocardial infarction compared with non-ischaemic myocardial injury. Heart 103(8):616–622. https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2016-310243

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Radovanovic D, Pilgrim T, Seifert B, Urban P, Pedrazzini G, Erne P (2017) Type 2 myocardial infarction: incidence, presentation, treatment and outcome in routine clinical practice. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown) 18(5):341–347. https://doi.org/10.2459/JCM.0000000000000504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Neumann JT, Sorensen NA, Rubsamen N, Ojeda F, Renne T, Qaderi V, Teltrop E, Kramer S, Quantius L, Zeller T, Karakas M, Blankenberg S, Westermann D (2017) Discrimination of patients with type 2 myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J 38(47):3514–3520. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehx457

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Greenslade JH, Adikari T, Mueller C, Sandoval Y, Nestelberger T, Parsonage W, Hawkins T, Cullen L (2017) Characteristics and occurrence of type 2 myocardial infarction in emergency department patients: a prospective study. Emerg Med J. https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2017-206869

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Sandoval Y, Smith SW, Sexter A, Thordsen SE, Bruen CA, Carlson MD, Dodd KW, Driver BE, Hu Y, Jacoby K, Johnson BK, Love SA, Moore JC, Schulz K, Scott NL, Apple FS (2017) Type 1 and 2 myocardial infarction and myocardial injury: clinical transition to high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I. Am J Med 130(12):1431–1439 e1434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2017.05.049

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Smilowitz NR, Subramanyam P, Gianos E, Reynolds HR, Shah B, Sedlis SP (2018) Treatment and outcomes of type 2 myocardial infarction and myocardial injury compared with type 1 myocardial infarction. Coron Artery Dis 29(1):46–52. https://doi.org/10.1097/MCA.0000000000000545

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Nestelberger T, Boeddinghaus J, Badertscher P, Twerenbold R, Wildi K, Breitenbucher D, Sabti Z, Puelacher C, Rubini Gimenez M, Kozhuharov N, Strebel I, Sazgary L, Schneider D, Jann J, du Fay de Lavallaz J, Miro O, Martin-Sanchez FJ, Morawiec B, Kawecki D, Muzyk P, Keller DI, Geigy N, Osswald S, Reichlin T, Mueller C, Investigators A (2017) Effect of definition on incidence and prognosis of type 2 myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 70(13):1558–1568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2017.07.774

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, Simoons ML, Chaitman BR, White HD, Writing Group on the Joint ESC/ACCF/AHA/WHF Task Force for the Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction, Thygesen K, Alpert JS, White HD, Jaffe AS, Katus HA, Apple FS, Lindahl B, Morrow DA, Chaitman BA, Clemmensen PM, Johanson P, Hod H, Underwood R, Bax JJ, Bonow RO, Pinto F, Gibbons RJ, Fox KA, Atar D, Newby LK, Galvani M, Hamm CW, Uretsky BF, Steg PG, Wijns W, Bassand JP, Menasche P, Ravkilde J, Ohman EM, Antman EM, Wallentin LC, Armstrong PW, Simoons ML, Januzzi JL, Nieminen MS, Gheorghiade M, Filippatos G, Luepker RV, Fortmann SP, Rosamond WD, Levy D, Wood D, Smith SC, Hu D, Lopez-Sendon JL, Robertson RM, Weaver D, Tendera M, Bove AA, Parkhomenko AN, Vasilieva EJ, Mendis S, ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines (2012) Third universal definition of myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J 33 (20):2551–2567. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehs184

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Thygesen K, Alpert JS, White HD, Joint ESC/ACCF/AHA/WHF Task Force for the Redefinition of Myocardial Infarction (2007) Universal definition of myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J 28 (20):2525–2538. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehm355

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Morrow DA, Wiviott SD, White HD, Nicolau JC, Bramucci E, Murphy SA, Bonaca MP, Ruff CT, Scirica BM, McCabe CH, Antman EM, Braunwald E (2009) Effect of the novel thienopyridine prasugrel compared with clopidogrel on spontaneous and procedural myocardial infarction in the trial to assess improvement in therapeutic outcomes by optimizing platelet inhibition with prasugrel-thrombolysis in myocardial Infarction 38: an application of the classification system from the universal definition of myocardial infarction. Circulation 119(21):2758–2764. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.833665

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Bonaca MP, Wiviott SD, Braunwald E, Murphy SA, Ruff CT, Antman EM, Morrow DA (2012) American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association/European Society of Cardiology/World Heart Federation universal definition of myocardial infarction classification system and the risk of cardiovascular death: observations from the TRITON-TIMI 38 trial (Trial to Assess Improvement in Therapeutic Outcomes by Optimizing Platelet Inhibition With Prasugrel-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 38). Circulation 125(4):577–583. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.041160

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. White HD, Reynolds HR, Carvalho AC, Pearte CA, Liu L, Martin CE, Knatterud GL, Dzavik V, Kruk M, Steg PG, Cantor WJ, Menon V, Lamas GA, Hochman JS (2012) Reinfarction after percutaneous coronary intervention or medical management using the universal definition in patients with total occlusion after myocardial infarction: results from long-term follow-up of the Occluded Artery Trial (OAT) cohort. Am Heart J 163(4):563–571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2012.01.016

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Gupta S, Vaidya SR, Arora S, Bahekar A, Devarapally SR (2017) Type 2 versus type 1 myocardial infarction: a comparison of clinical characteristics and outcomes with a meta-analysis of observational studies. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther 7(4):348–358. https://doi.org/10.21037/cdt.2017.03.21

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Amsterdam EA, Wenger NK, Brindis RG, Casey DE Jr, Ganiats TG, Holmes DR Jr, Jaffe AS, Jneid H, Kelly RF, Kontos MC, Levine GN, Liebson PR, Mukherjee D, Peterson ED, Sabatine MS, Smalling RW, Zieman SJ (2014) 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 64(24):e139–e228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2014.09.017

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Roffi M, Patrono C, Collet JP, Mueller C, Valgimigli M, Andreotti F, Bax JJ, Borger MA, Brotons C, Chew DP, Gencer B, Hasenfuss G, Kjeldsen K, Lancellotti P, Landmesser U, Mehilli J, Mukherjee D, Storey RF, Windecker S, Baumgartner H, Gaemperli O, Achenbach S, Agewall S, Badimon L, Baigent C, Bueno H, Bugiardini R, Carerj S, Casselman F, Cuisset T, Erol C, Fitzsimons D, Halle M, Hamm C, Hildick-Smith D, Huber K, Iliodromitis E, James S, Lewis BS, Lip GY, Piepoli MF, Richter D, Rosemann T, Sechtem U, Steg PG, Vrints C, Luis Zamorano J, Management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent STSEotESoC (2016) 2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: task force for the Management of Acute Coronary Syndromes in Patients Presenting without Persistent ST-Segment Elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 37 (3):267–315. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehv320

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Ibanez B, James S, Agewall S, Antunes MJ, Bucciarelli-Ducci C, Bueno H, Caforio ALP, Crea F, Goudevenos JA, Halvorsen S, Hindricks G, Kastrati A, Lenzen MJ, Prescott E, Roffi M, Valgimigli M, Varenhorst C, Vranckx P, Widimsky P, ESC Scientific Document Group (2017) 2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation: the Task Force for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehx393

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Thygesen K, Jaffe AS (2017) Detecting myocardial infarction type 2: targetting the right patients. Eur Heart J 38(47):3521–3522. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehx557

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Gaggin HK, Liu Y, Lyass A, van Kimmenade RR, Motiwala SR, Kelly NP, Mallick A, Gandhi PU, Ibrahim NE, Simon ML, Bhardwaj A, Belcher AM, Harisiades JE, Massaro JM, D’Agostino RB Sr, Januzzi JL Jr (2017) Incident type 2 myocardial infarction in a cohort of patients undergoing coronary or peripheral arterial angiography. Circulation 135(2):116–127. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.023052

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Ambrose JA, Loures-Vale A, Javed U, Buhari CF, Aftab W (2012) Angiographic correlates in type 1 and 2 MI by the universal definition. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 5(4):463–464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2011.12.016

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Sandoval Y, Smith SW, Apple FS (2014) Type 2 myocardial infarction: the next frontier. Am J Med 127(6):e19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2014.02.027

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by an unrestricted grant from the Association for the Promotion of Research in Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis and Vascular Biology (ATVB) and by the Ludwig Boltzmann Cluster for Cardiovascular Research, Vienna, Austria. The study funders had no role in the design or conduct of the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kris G. Vargas.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare they have no conflict of interest in relation to this work.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 119 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vargas, K.G., Haller, P.M., Jäger, B. et al. Variations on classification of main types of myocardial infarction: a systematic review and outcome meta-analysis. Clin Res Cardiol 108, 749–762 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-018-1403-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-018-1403-3

Keywords

Navigation