Skip to main content
Log in

Persistent angina: highly prevalent and associated with long-term anxiety, depression, low physical functioning, and quality of life in stable angina pectoris

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Clinical Research in Cardiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aims

To evaluate persistent angina in stable angina pectoris with no obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) compared to obstructive CAD and its relation to long-term anxiety, depression, quality of life (QOL), and physical functioning.

Methods and results

We invited 357 patients (men = 191; women = 166; response rate 83 %) with no prior cardiovascular disease who had a first-time coronary angiography (CAG) in 2008–2009 due to suspected stable angina to participate in a questionnaire survey in 2011 with the Seattle Angina Questionnaire and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale as key elements. Long-term persistent angina (i.e., symptoms at least once a month) was present in 64 % of patients with diffuse non-obstructive CAD (1–49 % stenosis), 49 % of patients with normal coronary arteries (0 % stenosis), and 41 % of patients with obstructive CAD (≥50 % stenosis) (P = 0.01). Depression and anxiety were more common in patients with persistent angina: 24 versus 7 % (P < 0.001) reported HADS-Depression-scores >7 and 42 versus 21 % (P < 0.001) reported HADS-Anxiety-scores >7. In multivariate regression models, persistent angina was associated with depression (OR 4.3, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.9–9.6, P < 0.001), anxiety (OR 2.9, 95 % CI 1.6–5.1, P < 0.001), the severity of persistent angina with impaired physical functioning (P < 0.001), and QOL (P < 0.001); whereas outcomes were not related to age, gender, or degree of CAD.

Conclusions

The study indicates higher prevalence of persistent angina in patients with diffuse non-obstructive CAD or normal coronary arteries than in patients with obstructive CAD. Persistent angina symptoms were associated with long-term anxiety, depression, impaired physical functioning, and QOL irrespective of the degree of CAD. Contrary to common perception, excluding obstructive CAD in stable angina does not ensure a favorable disease course, and further risk stratification and treatment strategies are warranted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jespersen L, Hvelplund A, Abildstrom SZ et al (2012) Stable angina pectoris with no obstructive coronary artery disease is associated with increased risks of major adverse cardiovascular events. Eur Heart J 33(6):734–744

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Pasternak RC, Thibault GE, Savoia M et al (1980) Chest pain with angiographically insignificant coronary arterial obstruction: clinical presentation and long-term follow-up. Am J Med 68(6):813–817

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Sullivan AK, Holdright DR, Wright CA et al (1994) Chest pain in women: clinical, investigative, and prognostic features. BMJ 2:308

    Google Scholar 

  4. Johnson BD, Shaw LJ, Pepine CJ et al (2006) Persistent chest pain predicts cardiovascular events in women without obstructive coronary artery disease: results from the NIH-NHLBI-sponsored Women’s Ischaemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE) study. Eur Heart J 27(12):1408–1415

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rozanski A, Blumenthal JA, Kaplan J (1999) Impact of psychological factors on the pathogenesis of cardiovascular disease and implications for therapy. Circulation 99(16):2192–2217

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. NOMESCO classification of surgical procedures (NCSP) (2010) http://www.sst.dk/publ/Publ2005/SESI/OPR2/OPR2.pdf. Accessed 20 Oct 2010

  7. SKS Sundhedsvæsenets klassifikations system, oversigt (2010) http://www.sst.dk/Indberetning%20og%20statistik/Klassifikationer/SKS_download.aspx. Accessed 20 Oct 2010

  8. Gaist D, Sorensen HT, Hallas J (1997) The Danish prescription registries. Dan Med Bull 44(4):445–448

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Spertus JA, Winder JA, Dewhurst TA et al (1995) Development and evaluation of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire: a new functional status measure for coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 25(2):333–341

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Bjelland I, Dahl AA, Haug TT et al (2002) The validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale: an updated literature review. J Psychosom Res 52(2):69–77

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wielgosz AT, Fletcher RH, McCants CB et al (1984) Unimproved chest pain in patients with minimal or no coronary disease: a behavioral phenomenon. Am Heart J 108(1):67–72

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bugiardini R, Manfrini O, Pizzi C et al (2004) Endothelial function predicts future development of coronary artery disease: a study of women with chest pain and normal coronary angiograms. Circulation 109(21):2518–2523

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Weintraub WS, Spertus JA, Kolm P et al (2008) Effect of PCI on quality of life in patients with stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med 359(7):677–687

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Shaw LJ, Shaw RE, Merz CNB et al (2008) Impact of ethnicity and gender differences on angiographic coronary artery disease prevalence and in-hospital mortality in the American College of Cardiology-National Cardiovascular Data Registry. Circulation 117(14):1787–1801

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Pepine CJ, Anderson RD, Sharaf BL et al (2010) Coronary microvascular reactivity to adenosine predicts adverse outcome in women evaluated for suspected ischemia: results from the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute WISE (Women’s Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation) study. J Am Coll Cardiol 55(25):2825–2832

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Cannon RO III, Epstein SE (1988) Microvascular angina as a cause of chest pain with angiographically normal coronary arteries. Am J Cardiol 61(15):1338–1343

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Buchthal SD, den Hollander JA, Merz CNB et al (2000) Abnormal myocardial phosphorus-31 nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy in women with chest pain but normal coronary angiograms. N Engl J Med 342(12):829–835

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Ong P, Athanasiadis A, Borgulya G et al (2012) High prevalence of a pathological response to acetylcholine testing in patients with stable angina pectoris and unobstructed coronary arteries: the ACOVA Study (Abnormal COronary VAsomotion in patients with stable angina and unobstructed coronary arteries). J Am Coll Cardiol 59(7):655–662

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Olson MB, Kelsey SF, Matthews K et al (2003) Symptoms, myocardial ischaemia and quality of life in women. Eur Heart J 24(16):1506–1514

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Atienza F, Velasco JA, Ridocci F et al (1999) Assessment of quality of life in patients with chest pain and normal coronary arteriogram (syndrome X) using a specific questionnaire. Clin Cardiol 22(4):283–291

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Katon W, Hall ML, Russo J et al (1988) Chest pain: relationship of psychiatric illness to coronary arteriographic results. Am J Med 84(1):1–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Lantinga LJ, Sprafkin RP, McCroskery JH et al (1988) One-year psychosocial follow-up of patients with chest pain and angiographically normal coronary arteries. Am J Cardiol 62(4):209–213

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Asbury EA, Creed F, Collins P (2004) Distinct psychosocial differences between women with coronary heart disease and cardiac syndrome X. Eur Heart J 25(19):1695–1701

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Bjerkeset O, Nordahl HM, Mykletun A et al (2005) Anxiety and depression following myocardial infarction: gender differences in a 5-year prospective study. J Psychosom Res 58(2):153–161

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Lesperance F, Frasure-Smith N, Talajic M (1996) Major depression before and after myocardial infarction: its nature and consequences. Psychosom Med 58(2):99–110

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Januzzi JL Jr, Stern TA, Pasternak RC et al (2000) The influence of anxiety and depression on outcomes of patients with coronary artery disease. Arch Intern Med 160(13):1913–1921

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Lichtman JH, Bigger JT, Blumenthal JA et al (2008) Depression and coronary heart disease. Circulation 118(17):1768–1775

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. DiMatteo M (2000) Depression is a risk factor for noncompliance with medical treatment: meta-analysis of the effects of anxiety and depression on patient adherence. Arch Intern Med 160(14):2101–2107

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by The Danish Heart Foundation (11-04-R83-A3257-22621).

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lasse Jespersen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jespersen, L., Abildstrøm, S.Z., Hvelplund, A. et al. Persistent angina: highly prevalent and associated with long-term anxiety, depression, low physical functioning, and quality of life in stable angina pectoris. Clin Res Cardiol 102, 571–581 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-013-0568-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-013-0568-z

Keywords

Navigation