Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effect of levosimendan and predictors of recovery in patients with peripartum cardiomyopathy, a randomized clinical trial

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Clinical Research in Cardiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Levosimendan is a promising new inodilator agent but its effectiveness in peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM) has not been tested in a clinical trial. The authors sought to evaluate the effect of levosimendan therapy and to determine the predictors of clinical outcome in patients with PPCM.

Methods and results

The authors prospectively randomized 24 consecutive women with PPCM. Twelve patients (control group) were randomized to conventional heart failure therapy and 12 patients (levosimendan group) were randomized to levosimendan in addition to the conventional therapy. Mean follow-up period was 20.9 ± 9 months (ranged 12–38 months). The two groups did not differ in baseline demographic and echocardiographic characteristics. Eleven patients (45.8%) recovered completely (6 in control group and 5 in levosimendan group, p > 0.05), 6 died (25%) (3 in control group and 3 in levosimendan group), and 7 (29.1%) were left with persistent left ventricular dysfunction (PLVD) (3 in control group and 4 in levosimendan group, p > 0.05). There were significant differences in baseline characteristics between deceased patients and survivors including left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (7.1 ± 0.6 vs. 6.4 ± 0.5 cm, p = 0.031), left ventricular end-systolic diameter (LVESD) (6.4 ± 0.8 vs. 5.5 ± 0.6 cm, p = 0.027), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (19.7 vs. 27.4%, p = 0.025), and left atrial diameter (4.9 ± 0.3 vs. 4.3 ± 0.4 cm, p = 0.011).

Conclusions

Addition of levosimendan to conventional therapy did not improve outcome in patients with PPCM. In patients with PLVD or patients who died, LVEF, LVESD and left atrial diameter were worse than those with complete resolution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

PPCM:

Peripartum cardiomyopathy

NYHA FC:

New York heart association functional class

LVEF:

Left ventricular ejection fraction

PLVD:

Persistent left ventricular dysfunction

LVESD:

Left ventricular end-systolic diameter

LVEDD:

Left ventricular end-diastolic diameter

References

  1. Demakis JG, Rahimtoola SH (1971) Peripartum cardiomyopathy. Circulation 44:964–968

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Sliwa K, Mocumbi AO (2010) Forgetten cardiovascular diseases in Africa. Clin Res Cardiol 99:65–74

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Pearson GD, Veille JC, Rahimtoola S et al (2000) Peripartum cardiomyopathy: National heart, lung and blood institute and office of rare diseases (national institutes of health) workshop recommendations and review. JAMA 283:1088–1183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hilfiker-Kleiner D, Kaminski K, Podewski E et al (2007) A cathepsin D-cleaved 16 kDa form of prolactin mediates postpartum cardiomyopathy. Cell 128:589–600

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Lehmann A, Boldt J, Kirchner J (2003) The role of Ca-sensitizers for the treatment of heart failure. Curr Opin Crit Care 9:337–344

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hitz MP, Bertram H, Köditz H (2008) Levosimendan for bridging in a pediatric patient with Alström syndrome awaiting heart-lung transplantation. Clin Res Cardiol 97:846–848

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Follath F, Cleland JG, Just H et al (2002) Efficacy and safety of intravenous levosimendan compared with dobutamine in severe low-output heart failure (the LIDO study): a randomised double-blind trial. Lancet 360:196–202

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Moiseyev VS, Poder P, Andrejevs N, Ruda MY, RUSSLAN Study Investigators (2002) Safety and efficacy of a novel calcium sensitizer, levosimendan, in patients with left ventricular failure due to an acute myocardial infarction. A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study (RUSSLAN). Eur Heart J 23:1422–1432

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Mebazaa A, Nieminen MS, Packer M, SURVIVE Investigators et al (2007) Levosimendan vs. dobutamine for patients with acute decompensated heart failure: the SURVIVE randomized trial. JAMA 297:1883–1891

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. De Luca L, Colucci WS, Nieminen MS, Massie BM, Gheorghiade M (2006) Evidence-based use of levosimendan in different clinical settings. Eur Heart J 27(16):1908–1920

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Benlolo S, Lefoll C, Katchatouryan V, Payen D, Mebazaa A (2004) Successful use of levosimendan in a patient with peripartum cardiomyopathy. Anesth Analg 98:822–824

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Nguyen HD, McKeown B (2005) Levosimendan for post-partum cardiomyopathy. Crit Care Resusc 7:107–110

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Benezet-Mazuecos J, de la Hera J (2008) Peripartum cardiomyopathy: a new successful setting for levosimendan. Int J Cardiol 123(3):346–347

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gottdiener JS, Bednarz J, Devereux R, American Society of Echocardiography et al (2004) American society of echocardiography recommendations for use of echocardiography in clinical trials. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 17:1086–1119

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Midei MG, DeMent SH, Feldman AM, Hutchins GM, Baughman KL (1990) Peripartum myocarditis and cardiomyopathy. Circulation 81:922–928

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Bozkurt B, Villaneuva FS, Holubkov R et al (1999) Intravenous immune globulin in the therapy of peripartum cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol 34:177–180

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Biteker M, Duran NE, Ozkan M (2009) The role of bromocriptine in peripartum cardiomyopathy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 201(2):e13

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Sliwa K, Blauwet L, Tibazarwa K et al (2010) Evaluation of bromocriptine in the treatment of acute severe peripartum cardiomyopathy. A proof-of-concept pilot study. Circulation 121(13):1465–1473

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Sliwa K, Hilfiker-Kleiner D, Petrie MC et al (2010) Current state of knowledge on aetiology, diagnosis, management, and therapy of peripartum cardiomyopathy: a position statement from the heart failure association of the European society of cardiology working group on peripartum cardiomyopathy. Eur J Heart Fail 12(8):767–778

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Duran N, Günes H, Duran I, Biteker M, Ozkan M (2008) Predictors of prognosis in patients with peripartum cardiomyopathy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 101:137–140

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. O’Connell JB, Costanzo-Nordin MR, Subramanian R et al (1986) Peripartum cardiomyopathy: clinical, hemodynamic, histologic and prognostic characteristics. J Am Coll Cardiol 8:52–56

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Amos AM, Jaber WA, Russell SD (2006) Improved outcomes in peripartum cardiomyopathy with contemporary. Am Heart J 152:509–513

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Biykem Bozkurt for critical reading of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Murat Biteker.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Biteker, M., Duran, N.E., Kaya, H. et al. Effect of levosimendan and predictors of recovery in patients with peripartum cardiomyopathy, a randomized clinical trial. Clin Res Cardiol 100, 571–577 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-010-0279-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-010-0279-7

Keywords

Navigation