Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Prevalence and prognostic impact of comorbidities in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis

  • ORIGINAL PAPER
  • Published:
Clinical Research in Cardiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

In patients with severe aortic valve stenosis (valve area ≤ 1 cm2, AS), the prevalence and the prognostic impact of comorbidities is unknown. Fifty-eight patients with severe AS (mean aortic valve area 0.8 ± 0.2 cm2), who underwent cardiac catheterization and 2-D/Doppler echocardiography, were prospectively enrolled. The glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was estimated using the abbreviated Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study equation. Death from a cardiac cause was defined as study end point.

Coronary artery disease was present in 33 patients (57%). Subsequently, 43 patients (77%) underwent aortic valve replacement. During a follow-up of 485 ± 336 days, 11 patients suffered a cardiac death. Survivors and non-survivors did not differ with respect the prevalence of coronary artery disease, invasive hemodynamic measurements or echocardiographic variables of systolic/diastolic function. Non-survivors were in a poorer NYHA functional class (3.2 ± 0.3 vs 2.4±0.8, p = 0.002), had a lower eGFR (33.4 ± 15.5 ml/min/1.73 m2 vs 49.1 ± 15.6 ml/min/1.73m2, p = 0.004), a higher prevalence of diabetes mellitus (73% vs. 22%, p = 0.0001) and a lower serum hemoglobin level (11.6 ± 2.1 vs 13.0 ± 1.5 g/dL, p = 0.017). By multivariate Cox analysis, NYHA class (hazard ratio: 6.17, p = 0.013) and eGFR (hazard ratio 0.95, p = 0.04) were independent prognostic predictors. In patients with eGFR < 41.8 ml/min/1.73 m2 (cut-off value derived from ROC analysis, area under the curve: 0.78 ± 0.08), outcome was markedly poorer as compared to patients with eGFR > 41.8 ml/min/1.73 m2 (event-free survival rate of 38% vs 93%, p = 0.004). Thus, in patients with severe AS, comorbidities are frequent, and particularly kidney disease significantly impacts longterm outcome.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anavekar NS, McMurray JJ, Velazquez EJ, Solomon SD, Kober L, Rouleau JL, White HD, Nordlander R, Maggioni A, Dickstein K, Zelenkofske S, Leimberger JD, Califf RM, Pfeffer MA (2004) Relation between renal dysfunction and cardiovascular outcomes after myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 351:1285–1295

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bergler-Klein J, Klaar U, Heger M, Rosenhek R, Mundigler G, Gabriel H, Binder T, Pacher R, Maurer G, Baumgartner H (2004) Natriuretic peptides predict symptom-free survival and postoperative outcome in severe aortic stenosis. Circulation 109:2302–2308

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bongartz LG, Cramer MJ, Doevendans PA, Joles JA, Braam B (2005) The severe cardiorenal syndrome: ‘Guyton revisited’. Eur Heart J 26:11–17

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gjertsson P, Caidahl K, Farasati M, Oden A, Bech-Hanssen O (2005) Preoperative moderate to severe diastolic dysfunction: a novel Doppler echocardiographic long-term prognostic factor in patients with severe aortic stenosis. J Thoracic Cardiovasc Surg 129:890–896

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Go AS, Chertow GM, Fan D, McCulloch CE, Hsu CY (2004) Chronic kidney disease and the risks of death, cardiovascular events, and hospitalization. N Engl J Med 351:1296–1305

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Gould KL, Carabello BA (2003) Why angina in aortic stenosis with normal coronary arteriograms? Circulation 107:3121–3123

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Haghi D, Suselbeck T, Fluechter S, Kalmar G, Schroder M, Kaden JJ, Poerner T, Borggrefe M, Papavassiliu T (2006) A hybrid approach for quantification of aortic valve stenosis using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and echocardiography: comparison to right heart catheterization and standard echocardiography. Clin Res Cardiol 95:162–167

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Horstkotte D, Loogen F (1988) The natural history of aortic valve stenosis. Eur Heart J 9(Suppl E):57–64

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kvidal P, Bergstrom R, Horte LG, Stahle E (2000) Observed and relative survival after aortic valve replacement. J Am Coll Cardiol 35:747–756

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Levey AS, Bosch JP, Lewis JB, Greene T, Rogers N, Roth D (1999) A more accurate method to estimate glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine: a new prediction equation. Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Group. Ann Intern Med 130:461–470

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lund O (1990) Preoperative risk evaluation and stratification of long-term survival after valve replacement for aortic stenosis. Reasons for earlier operative intervention. Circulation 82:124–139

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. National Kidney Foundation (2002) Clinical practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease: evaluation, classification, and stratification. Am J Kidney Dis 2(Suppl 1):S46–S47

    Google Scholar 

  13. Otto CM, Burwash IG, Legget ME, Munt BI, Fujioka M, Healy NL, Kraft CD, Miyake-Hull CY, Schwaegler RG (1997) Prospective study of asymptomatic valvular aortic stenosis. Clinical, echocardiographic, and exercise predictors of outcome. Circulation 95:2262–2270

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Pellikka PA, Sarano ME, Nishimura RA, Malouf JF, Bailey KR, Scott CG, Barnes ME, Tajik AJ (2005) The natural history of adults with asymptomatic, hemodynamically significant aortic stenosis. Circulation 111:3290– 3295

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rivas-Gotz C, Manolios M, Thohan V, Nagueh SF (2003) Impact of left ventricular ejection fraction on estimation of left ventricular filling pressures using tissue Doppler and flow propagation velocity. Am J Cardiol 91:780–784

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rosenhek R, Binder T, Porenta G, Lang I, Christ G, Schemper M, Maurer G, Baumgartner H (2000) Predictors of outcome in severe, asymptomatic aortic stenosis. N Engl J Med 343:611–617

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Rosenhek R, Klaar U, Schemper M, Scholten C, Heger M, Gabriel H, Binder T, Maurer G, Baumgartner H (2004) Mild and moderate aortic stenosis. Natural history and risk stratification by echocardiography. Eur Heart J 25:199–205

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sarnak MJ (2003) Cardiovascular complications in chronic kidney disease. Am J Kidney Dis 41(Suppl):11–17

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Scharhag J, Meyer T, Kindermann I, Schneider G, Urhausen A, Kindermann W (2006) Bicuspid aortic valve: evaluation of the ability to participate in competitive sports: case reports of two soccer players. Clin Res Cardiol 95:228–234

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Shavelle DM, Otto CM (2002) Aortic Stenosis. Echocardiographic evaluation of disease severity, disease progression, and the role of echocardiography in clinical decision making. In: Otto CM (ed) The Practice of Clinical Echocardiography. Second Edition. WB Saunders Company, Philadephia London New York, pp 469– 499

  21. Schiller NB, Shah PM, Crawford M, DeMaria A, Devereux R, Feigenbaum H, Gutgesell H, Reichek N, Sahn D, Schnittger I et al (1989) Recommendations for quantitation of the left ventricular by two-dimensional echocardiography. American Society of Echocardiography committee on standards, subcommittee on quantitation of two-dimensional echocardiograms. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2:358–367

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Smith WT, Ferguson TB, Ryan T, Landolfo CK, Peterson ED (2004) Should coronary artery bypass graft surgery patients with mild or moderate aortic stenosis undergo concomitant aortic valve replacement? A decision analysis approach to the surgical dilemma. J Am Coll Cardiol 44:1241–1247

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Stewart BF, Siscovick D, Lind BK, Gardin JM, Gottdiener JS, Smith VE, Kitzman DW, Otto CM (1997) Clinical factors associated with calcific aortic valve disease. Cardiovascular health study. J Am Coll Cardiol 29:630–634

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. The Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus (1997) Report of the expert committee on the diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 20:1183–1197

    Google Scholar 

  25. World Health Organisation (1968) Nutritional anemias: report of a WHO scientific group. WHO Tech Rep Ser 405:3–37

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christian Bruch MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bruch, C., Kauling, D., Reinecke, H. et al. Prevalence and prognostic impact of comorbidities in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis. Clin Res Cardiol 96, 23–29 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-006-0452-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-006-0452-1

Key words

Navigation