Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Present treatment of acute myocardial infarction in patients over 75 years

Data from the Berlin Myocardial Infarction Registry (BHIR)

  • ORIGINAL PAPER
  • Published:
Clinical Research in Cardiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Aims

Guidelines issued by European and German cardiology societies clearly define procedures for treatment of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). These guidelines, however, are based on clinical studies in which older patients are underrepresented. Older patients, on the other hand, represent a large and growing portion of the infarction population. It was our goal in the present paper to analyse the present treatment of AMI patients over 75 years of age in the city of Berlin, Germany, with data gained from the Berlin Myocardial Infarction Registry (BHIR).

Methods

We prospectively collected data from 5079 patients (3311 men and 1768 women, mean age 65.6) with acute myocardial infarction who were treated in 25 hospitals in Berlin during the period 1999–2003. 1319 patients (25.9%) were older than 75 (mean age 82.5 years).

Results

Overall hospital mortality rate was 11.6%. In patients over 75, this rate was 23.9%; among the younger infarction population, it was 7.3%. In contrast to the younger AMI patients, the majority of those over 75 were female (62.5 vs 25.1% for the younger) and demonstrated a significantly higher frequency of all prognostically meaningful comorbidities (heart failure 14.4% vs. 3.5%; renal failure 11.5 vs 3.9%; diabetes 37.3 vs 24.3%). Clinical signs of severe infarction, moreover, were more common among the aged patients (pulmonary congestion 45.4 vs 19.7%; left bundle branch block 12.7 vs 3.6%). Pre–hospital time was prolonged (2.8 vs 2 h) and guideline–recommended therapy was applied significantly less frequently to AMI patients over 75 (reperfusion therapy 39.8 vs 71.7%, beta–blockers 62.8 vs 78.3%, statins 26.5 vs 45.5%). Multivariate analysis revealed the following factors to be independent predictors of hospital mortality in patients over 75: age (OR 1.05 per year), acute heart failure (OR 2.39), pre–hospital resuscitation (OR 10.6), cardiogenic shock (OR 2.73), pre–hospital delay >12 h (OR 1.68), and ST elevation in the first ECG (OR 2.09). Independent predictors of a favourable hospital course were as follows: admission to a hospital >600 beds (OR 0.64), reperfusion therapy (OR 0.63), early betablocker treatment (OR 0.46), and early application of ACE inhibitors (OR 0.48).

Conclusion

Infarction patients over 75 have a very high hospital complication and mortality rate. They are typically treated with delay, and with less adherence to relevant guidelines than are younger patients. Reperfusion therapy, early administra tion of beta–blockers and ACE inhibitors, as well as admission to large medical centres are all factors that contribute to a favourable prognosis of high–aged AMI patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pötsch O, Sommer B (2005) 10. koordinierte Bevölkerungsvorausberechnung. Statistisches Bundesamt. www.destatis.de/presse/deutsch/pk/ 2003/bev_2050.htm

  2. Maier B, Balzi D, Tiia A, Zeller M, Kallischnigg G, Barchielli A, Teesalu R, Yves C, Theres H, Buiatti E, Jaan E, Beer JC (2005) Hospital care of patients with ST–elevation myocardial infarction in four different european regions: Data from regional myocardial infarction registries in Berlin, Dijon, Florence, Tartu. Bundesgesundheitsblatt – Gesundheitsforschung – Gesundheitsschutz 48(10):1176–1183

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Rogers WJ, Canto JG, Lambrew CT, Tiefenbrunn AJ, Kinkaid B, Shoultz DA, Frederick PD, Every N (2000) Temporal trends in the treatment of over 1,5 million patients with myocardial infarction in the US from 1990 through 1999 Am Coll Cardiol 36:2056–2063

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lee PY, Alexander KP, Hammill BG, Pasquali SK, Peterson ED (2001) Representation of elderly persons and women in published randomized trials of acute coronary syndromes. JAMA 286:708–713

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. De Boer MJ, Ottervanger JP, van’t Hof AW, Hoorntje JC, Suryapranata H, Zijlstra F (2002) Reperfusion therapy in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction: A randomized comparison of primary angioplasty and thrombolytic therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol 39:1723–1728

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Goldenberg I, Matetzky S, Halkin A, Roth A, Di Segni E, Freimark D, Elian D, Agranat O, Zahav YH, Guetta V, Hod H (2003) Primary angioplasty with routine stenting compared with thrombolytic therapy in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction. Am Heart J 145:862–867

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Zeymer U, Gitt A, Winkler R, Zahn R, Jünger C, Schiele R, Gottwik M, Senges J: for the ACOS Registry (2005) Sterblichkeit bei über 75–jährigen Patienten mit akutem ST–Hebungsinfarkt im klinischen Alltag. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 130:633–636

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Zahn R, Schiele R, Schneider S, Gitt A, Senges J (2002) Clinical practice of primary angioplasty for the treatment of acute myocardial infarction in Germany: results from the MITRA and MIR registries. Z Kardiol 91 (Suppl 3):III/64–III/71

    Google Scholar 

  9. Van de Werf F, Ardissino D, Betriu A, Cokkinos DV, Falk E, Fox KAA, Julian D, Lengyel M, Neumann FJ, Ruzyllo W, Thygesen C, Underwood R, Vahanian A, Verheugt FWA, Wijns W (2003) Management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST–segment elevation. The Task Force on the Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 24(1):28–66

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. BerlinerHerzinfarktregister e.V.: Questionnaires (2005) www.herzinfarktregister.de/fakten/ untersuchungen.htm

  11. Gesundheitsberichterstattung des Bundes. Krankenhausstatistik (2003) www.gbe–bund.de

  12. Theres H, Maier B, Matteucci Gothe R, Schnippa S, Kallischnigg G, Schüren KP, Thimme W (2004) Influence of gender on treatment and short term mortality of patients with acute myocardial infarction in Berlin. Z Kardiol 93:954–963

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kentsch M, Rodemerk U, Müller–Esch G, Schnoor U, Munzel T, Ittel TH, Mitusch R (2002) Emotional attitudes toward symptoms and inadequate coping strategies are major determinants of patient delay in acute myocardial infarction. Z Kardiol 91(2):147–155

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Granger CB, Goldberg RJ, Dabbous O, Pieper KS, Eagle KA, Cannon CP, Van de Werf F, Avezum A, Goodman SG, Flather MD, Fox KAA, for the GRACE Investigators (2003) Predictors of hospital mortality in the Global Registry of acute coronary events. Arch Intern Med 163:2345–2353

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Wagner S, Schneider S, Schiele R, Fischer F, Dehn H, Grube R, Becker G, Baumgärtel B, Altmann E, Senges J (1999) Akuter Myokardinfarkt in Deutschland im Zeitraum zwischen 1996 und 1998: Therapie und hospitaler Verlauf. Z Kardiol 88:857–867

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kurotobi T, Sato H, Kinjo K, Nakatani D, Mizuno H, Shimizu M, Imai K, Hirayama A, Kodama K, Hori M, for the OACIS Group (2004) Reduced collateral circulation to the infarct–related artery in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction. Am Coll Cardiol 44:28–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Roberts WC, Shirani J (1998) Comparison of cardiac findings at necropsy in octogenarians, nonagenarians, and centenarians. Am J Cardiol 82:627–631

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Halon DA, Adawi S, Dobrecky–Mery I, Lewis BS (2004) Importance of increasing age on the presentation and outcome of acute coronary syndromes in elderly patients. Am Coll Cardiol 43:346–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Fox KAA, Goodman SG, Anderson FA, Granger CB, Moscucci M, Flather MD, Spencer F, Budaj A, Dabbous OH, Gore JM, for the GRACE Investigators (2003) From guidelines to clinical practice: the impact of hospital and geographical characteristics on temporal trends in the management of acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J 24:1414–1424

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Barchielli A, Buiatti E, Balzi D, Santoro GM, Carrabba N, Fabiani P, Maci M, Margheri M, Mangani I, Monami M, Marchionni N, for the AMI–Florence Working Group (2004) Age–related changes in treatment strategies for acute myocardial infarction: A population–based study. J Am Geriatr Soc 52:1355–1360

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Haase KK, Schiele R, Wagner S, Fischer F, Burczyk U, Zahn R, Schuster S, Senges J (2000) In–hospital mortality of elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction: data from the MITRA Registry. Clin Cardiol 23:831–836

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Thiemann DR, Coresh J, Schulman SP, Gerstenblith G, Oetgen WJ, Powe NR (2000) Lack of benefit for intravenous thrombolysis in patients with myocardial infarction who are older than 75 years. Circulation 101:2239–2246

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Bode C (2004) Akuttherapie bei AMIAktueller Stand. Z Kardiol 93 (Suppl 1):i7–i9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Mehta RH, Granger CB, Alexander KP, Bossone E, White HD, Sketch MH (2005) Reperfusion strategies for acute myocardial infarction in the elderly. Benefits and risks. Am Coll Cardiol 45:471–778

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hochmann JS, Sleeper LA, Webb JG, Sanborn TA, White HD, Talley JD, Buller CE, Jacobs AK, Slater JN, Col J, McKinlay SM, LeJemtel TH (The Shock Investigators) (1999) Early revascularisation in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. N Eng J Med 341 (9):625–634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Tölg R, Witt M, Schwarz B, Kurz T, Kurowski V, Hartmann F, Geist V, Richard G (2006) Comparison of carvedilol and metoprolol in patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing primary coronary intervention. The PASSAT Study. Clin Res Cardiol 95:31–41

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Bach U (1998) Einführung einer Erklärung zu Reanimation und Verlegung auf die Intensivstation in einem Berliner Krankenhaus. Inaugural–Dissertation am Fachbereich Humanmedizin der Freien Universität Berlin

  28. Rathore SS, Mehta RH, Wang Y, Radford MJ, Krumholz HM (2003) Age and quality of care provided to elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction. The TIME–Investigators. Am J Med 114(4):307–315

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Sloan FA, Trogdon JG, Curtis LH, Schulman KA (2004) The effect of dementia on outcome and process of care for medicare beneficiaries admitted with acute myocardial infarction. J Am Geriatr Soc 52:173–181

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jochen Schuler.

Additional information

Sources of funding: BHIR was supported by unrestricted grants from the Technical University of Berlin, Berlin Senate, Berlin Chamber of Physicians, Boehringer Ingelheim, Merck, Sharp & Dohme

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schuler, J., Maier, B., Behrens, S. et al. Present treatment of acute myocardial infarction in patients over 75 years. Clin Res Cardiol 95, 360–367 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-006-0393-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-006-0393-8

Key words

Navigation