Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) versus patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) in laparoscopic colectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Review
  • Published:
International Journal of Colorectal Disease Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

A meta-analysis of RCTs was designed to provide an up-to-date comparison of thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) and patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) in laparoscopic colectomy.

Methods

Our study was completed following the PRISMA guidelines and the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. A systematic literature screening was performed in MEDLINE and Web of Science. Fixed effects (FE) or random effects (RE) models were estimated based on the Cochran Q test result.

Results

Totally, 8 studies were introduced in the present meta-analysis. Superiority of PCA in terms of length of hospital stay (LOS) (WMD 0.73, p = 0.004) and total complication rate (OR 1.57, p = 0.02) was found. TEA had a lower resting pain visual analogue scale (VAS) score at Day 1 (WMD − 2.23, p = 0.005) and Day 2 (WMD − 2.17, p = 0.01). TEA group had also a systematically lower walking VAS. Moreover, first bowel opened time (first defecation) (WMD − 0.88, p < 0.00001) was higher when PCA was applied.

Conclusions

TEA was related to a lower first bowel opened time, walking, and resting pain levels at the first postoperative days. However, the overall complication rate and LOS were higher in the epidural analgesia group. Thus, for a safe conclusion to be drawn, further randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of a higher methodological and quality level are required.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Etzioni DA, Cannom RR, Madoff RD, Ault GT, Beart RW (2010) Colorectal procedures: what proportion is performed by American board of colon and rectal surgery–certified surgeons? Dis Colon Rectum 53:713–720. https://doi.org/10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181d32084

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Greco M, Capretti G, Beretta L, Gemma M, Pecorelli N, Braga M (2014) Enhanced recovery program in colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. World J Surg 38:1531–1541. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-013-2416-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Harji DP, Griffiths B, Burke D, Sagar PM (2014) Systematic review of emergency laparoscopic colorectal resection. Br J Surg 101:e126–e133. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.9348

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gustafsson UO, Scott MJ, Schwenk W, Demartines N, Roulin D, Francis N, McNaught CE, MacFie J, Liberman AS, Soop M, Hill A, Kennedy RH, Lobo DN, Fearon K, Ljungqvist O, Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Society (2012) Guidelines for perioperative care in elective colonic surgery: enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS®) society recommendations. Clin Nutr 31:783–800. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2012.08.013

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Manso M, Schmelz J, Aloia T (2017) ERAS-anticipated outcomes and realistic goals. J Surg Oncol 116:570–577. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.24791

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Pędziwiatr M, Mavrikis J, Witowski J, Adamos A, Major P, Nowakowski M, Budzyński A (2018) Current status of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol in gastrointestinal surgery. Med Oncol 35:95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-018-1153-0

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhuang C-L, Huang D-D, Chen F-F, Zhou C-J, Zheng B-S, Chen B-C, Shen X, Yu Z (2015) Laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery within enhanced recovery after surgery programs: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Surg Endosc 29:2091–2100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3922-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Spanjersberg WR, van Sambeeck JDP, Bremers A, Rosman C, van Laarhoven CJHM (2015) Systematic review and meta-analysis for laparoscopic versus open colon surgery with or without an ERAS programme. Surg Endosc 29:3443–3453. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4148-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Borzellino G, Francis NK, Chapuis O, Krastinova E, Dyevre V, Genna M (2016) Role of epidural analgesia within an ERAS program after laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled studies. Surg Res Pract 2016:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/7543684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cummings KC III, Zimmerman NM, Maheshwari K, Cooper GS, Cummings LC (2018) Epidural compared with non-epidural analgesia and cardiopulmonary complications after colectomy: a retrospective cohort study of 20,880 patients using a national quality database. J Clin Anesth 47:12–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinane.2018.03.005

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Carmichael JC, Keller DS, Baldini G, Bordeianou L, Weiss E, Lee L, Boutros M, McClane J, Steele SR, Feldman LS (2017) Clinical practice guideline for enhanced recovery after colon and rectal surgery from the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS) and Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES). Surg Endosc 31:3412–3436. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5722-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Senagore AJ, Delaney CP, Mekhail N, Dugan A, Fazio VW (2003) Randomized clinical trial comparing epidural anaesthesia and patient-controlled analgesia after laparoscopic segmental colectomy. Br J Surg 90:1195–1199. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.4223

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Taqi A, Hong X, Mistraletti G, Stein B, Charlebois P, Carli F (2007) Thoracic epidural analgesia facilitates the restoration of bowel function and dietary intake in patients undergoing laparoscopic colon resection using a traditional, nonaccelerated, perioperative care program. Surg Endosc Other Interv Tech 21:247–252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-006-0069-5

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Zingg U, Miskovic D, Hamel CT, Erni L, Oertli D, Metzger U (2009) Influence of thoracic epidural analgesia on postoperative pain relief and ileus after laparoscopic colorectal resection: benefit with epidural analgesia. Surg Endosc 23:276–282. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-9888-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, PRISMA Group (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 6:e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, Jüni P, Moher D, Oxman AD, Savovic J, Schulz KF, Weeks L, Sterne JAC, Cochrane Bias Methods Group, Cochrane Statistical Methods Group (2011) The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 343:d5928

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Hozo SP, Djulbegovic B, Hozo I (2005) Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample. BMC Med Res Methodol 5:13. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-5-13

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Levy BF, Scott MJ, Fawcett W, Fry C, Rockall TA (2011) Randomized clinical trial of epidural, spinal or patient-controlled analgesia for patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 98:1068–1078. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.7545

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Neudecker J, Schwenk W, Junghans T, Pietsch S, Böhm B, Müller JM (1999) Randomized controlled trial to examine the influence of thoracic epidural analgesia on postoperative ileus after laparoscopic sigmoid resection. Br J Surg 86:1292–1295. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2168.1999.01242.x

  20. Turunen P, Carpelan-Holmstrom M, Kairaluoma P, Wikstrom H, Kruuna O, Pere P, Bachmann M, Sarna S, Scheinin T (2009) Epidural analgesia diminished pain but did not otherwise improve enhanced recovery after laparoscopic sigmoidectomy: a prospective randomized study. Surg Endosc 23:31–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-0100-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Wongyingsinn M, Baldini G, Charlebois P, Liberman S, Stein B, Carli F (2011) Intravenous lidocaine versus thoracic epidural analgesia: a randomized controlled trial in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery using an enhanced recovery program. Reg Anesth Pain Med 36:241–248. https://doi.org/10.1097/AAP.0b013e31820d4362

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hubner M, Blanc C, Roulin D, Winiker M, Gander S, Demartines N (2015) Randomized clinical trial on epidural versus patient-controlled analgesia for laparoscopic colorectal surgery within an enhanced recovery pathway. Ann Surg 261:648–653. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000000838

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Rockall TA, Demartines N (2014) Laparoscopy in the era of enhanced recovery. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 28:133–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpg.2013.11.001

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Watt DG, McSorley ST, Horgan PG, McMillan DC (2015) Enhanced recovery after surgery: which components, if any, impact on the systemic inflammatory response following colorectal surgery: a systematic review. Medicine (Baltimore) 94:e1286. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000001286

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Miller TE, Thacker JK, White WD, Mantyh C, Migaly J, Jin J, Roche AM, Eisenstein EL, Edwards R, Anstrom KJ, Moon RE, Gan TJ, Enhanced Recovery Study Group (2014) Reduced length of hospital stay in colorectal surgery after implementation of an enhanced recovery protocol. Anesth Analg 118:1052–1061. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000000206

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Schmidt CR (2017) Enhanced recovery after surgery-summary recommendations. J Surg Oncol 116:638–638. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.24802

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Feldheiser A, Aziz O, Baldini G, Cox BPBW, Fearon KCH, Feldman LS, Gan TJ, Kennedy RH, Ljungqvist O, Lobo DN, Miller T, Radtke FF, Ruiz Garces T, Schricker T, Scott MJ, Thacker JK, Ytrebø LM, Carli F (2016) Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) for gastrointestinal surgery, part 2: consensus statement for anaesthesia practice. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 60:289–334. https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.12651

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kehlet H, Wilmore DW (2002) Multimodal strategies to improve surgical outcome. Am J Surg 183:630–641

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Carli F, Charlebois P, Baldini G, Cachero O, Stein B (2009) An integrated multidisciplinary approach to implementation of a fast-track program for laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Can J Anesth Can d’anesthésie 56:837–842. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-009-9159-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Dennis R, Mills P (2008) Thoracic epidural versus morphine patient controlled analgesia after laparoscopic colectomy. World J Laparosc Surg 1:49–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Liu H, Hu X, Duan X, Wu J (2014) Thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) vs. patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) in laparoscopic colectomy: a meta-analysis. Hepatogastroenterology 61:1213–1219

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Bardram L, Funch-Jensen P, Jensen P, Kehlet H, Crawford M (1995) Recovery after laparoscopic colonic surgery with epidural analgesia, and early oral nutrition and mobilisation. Lancet 345:763–764. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(95)90643-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Wu CL, Richman JM (2004) Postoperative pain and quality of recovery. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 17:455–460

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Garimella V, Cellini C (2013) Postoperative pain control. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 26:191–196. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1351138

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Khan SA, Khokhar HA, Nasr ARH, Carton E, El-Masry S (2013) Effect of epidural analgesia on bowel function in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 27:2581–2591. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-2794-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Levy BF, Tilney HS, Dowson HMP, Rockall TA (2010) A systematic review of postoperative analgesia following laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Color Dis 12:5–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-1318.2009.01799.x

  37. Helander EM, Webb MP, Bias M, Whang EE, Kaye AD, Urman RD (2017) Use of regional anesthesia techniques: analysis of institutional enhanced recovery after surgery protocols for colorectal surgery. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 27:898–902. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2017.0339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. von Hösslin T, Imboden P, Lüthi A, Rozanski MJ, Schnider TW, Filipovic M (2016) Adverse events of postoperative thoracic epidural analgesia. Eur J Anaesthesiol 33:708–714. https://doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0000000000000446

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Scherer RU, Giebler RM (1999) Risks and complications of thoracic epidural anaesthesia. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 13:101–109. https://doi.org/10.1053/BEAN.1999.0010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Choi JB, Shim YH, Lee Y-W, Lee JS, Choi J-R, Chang CH (2014) Incidence and risk factors of postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients with fentanyl-based intravenous patient-controlled analgesia and single antiemetic prophylaxis. Yonsei Med J 55:1430–1435. https://doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2014.55.5.1430

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Koh JC, Lee J, Kim SY, Choi S, Han DW (2015) Postoperative pain and intravenous patient-controlled analgesia-related adverse effects in young and elderly patients: a retrospective analysis of 10,575 patients. Medicine (Baltimore) 94:e2008. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000002008

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Macintyre PE (2001) Safety and efficacy of patient-controlled analgesia. Br J Anaesth 87:36–46. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/87.1.36

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Koh JC, Song Y, Kim SY, Park S, Ko SH, Han DW (2017) Postoperative pain and patient-controlled epidural analgesia-related adverse effects in young and elderly patients: a retrospective analysis of 2,435 patients. J Pain Res Volume 10:897–904. https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S133235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Kim SH, Yoon KB, Yoon DM, Kim CM, Shin YS (2013) Patient-controlled epidural analgesia with ropivacaine and fentanyl: experience with 2,276 surgical patients. Korean J Pain 26:39–45. https://doi.org/10.3344/kjp.2013.26.1.39

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Hughes MJ, Ventham NT, McNally S, Harrison E, Wigmore S (2014) Analgesia after open abdominal surgery in the setting of enhanced recovery surgery. JAMA Surg 149:1224–1230. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2014.210

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. daSilva M, Lomelin D, Tsui J, Klinginsmith M, Tadaki C, Langenfeld S (2015) Pain control for laparoscopic colectomy: an analysis of the incidence and utility of epidural analgesia compared to conventional analgesia. Tech Coloproctol 19:515–520. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-015-1336-z

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. de Boer HD, Detriche O, Forget P (2017) Opioid-related side effects: postoperative ileus, urinary retention, nausea and vomiting, and shivering. A review of the literature. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 31:499–504. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BPA.2017.07.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Koo KC, Yoon YE, Chung BH, Hong SJ, Rha KH (2014) Analgesic opioid dose is an important indicator of postoperative ileus following radical cystectomy with ileal conduit: experience in the robotic surgery era. Yonsei Med J 55:1359–1365. https://doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2014.55.5.1359

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Larissa, Mezourlo, 41110, Larissa, Greece

    Konstantinos Perivoliotis, George Tzovaras & Ioannis Baloyiannis

  2. Department of Anaesthesiology, University Hospital of Larissa, Mezourlo, 41110, Larissa, Greece

    Chamaidi Sarakatsianou & Stavroula Georgopoulou

Authors
  1. Konstantinos Perivoliotis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Chamaidi Sarakatsianou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Stavroula Georgopoulou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. George Tzovaras
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ioannis Baloyiannis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ioannis Baloyiannis.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(PDF 262 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Perivoliotis, K., Sarakatsianou, C., Georgopoulou, S. et al. Thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) versus patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) in laparoscopic colectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 34, 27–38 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-018-3207-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-018-3207-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation