Abstract
Aims
Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) guidelines require patients with colorectal cancer to wait no longer than 62 days from first referral to initiation of definitive treatment. We previously demonstrated that failure to meet with these guidelines did not appear to lead to poor outcomes in the short term. This study investigates whether this holds true over a longer period.
Methods
The survival status of 1,012 patients treated for colorectal cancer between January 1999 and June 2005 was reviewed. As in the previous audit, patients were placed into four groups, standard met (elective), standard met (emergency), standard failed (elective) and standard failed (emergency). Parameters analysed were pathological staging, 30-day mortality, long-term survival and cause of death. Data was analysed using log rank and chi-squared tests.
Results
Operative mortality was higher in patients meeting the standard (7% elective, 20% emergency) compared to those who did not meet the standard (4% elective, 7% emergency). The proportion of early stage disease (Dukes’ A and B) was highest in elective patients who failed the standard (50%) and lowest in emergencies meeting the standard (30%). Long-term survival was greatest in elective patients who failed the standard with 52% alive in October 2011 compared to 34% of elective cases meeting the standard. The most common cause of recorded death was colorectal cancer in all groups.
Conclusions
Patients who were not treated within the time frame set by the SIGN guidelines survived for longer following surgery. Reasons for this are likely to be multifactorial and include pathological cancer stage.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
WHO. Cancer, fact sheet number 297. World Health Organization, Geneva; (2009) http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs297/en/index.html. (accessed Aug 28, 2015)
Cancer Research UK (2009) By stage at diagnosis. Cancer Research UK, London http://info.cancerresearchuk.org/cancerstats/types/bowel/survival/index.htm#stage. (accessed Feb 24, 2010)
Department of Health (2000) The NHS Cancer plan: a plan for investment, a plan for reform. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20130222181549/http://www.dh.gov.uk/prod_consum_dh/groups/dh_digitalassets/@dh/@en/documents/digitalasset/dh_4014513.pdf (accessed October 31, 2017)
Department of Health (2007) NHS Cancer reform strategy https://www.nhs.uk/NHSEngland/NSF/Documents/Cancer%20Reform%20Strategy.pdf (accessed October 31, 2017)
The Scottish Government (2008) Better Cancer Care, an Action Plan. http://www.gov.scot/Resource/Doc/242498/0067458.pdf (accessed October 31, 2017)
NHS National Services Scotland. Information Services Division (2015) Cancer Waiting Times in Scotland. https://www.isdscotland.org/Health-Topics/Waiting-Times/Publications/2015-06-30/2015-06-30-CancerWT-Report.pdf (accessed October 31, 2017)
Irvin TT, Greaney MG (1977) Duration of symptoms and prognosis of carcinoma of the colon and rectum. Surg Gynecol Obstet 144:883–886
Polissar L, Sim D, Francis A (1981) Survival of colorectal cancer patients in relation to duration of symptoms and other prognostic factors. Dis Colon Rectum 24:364–369
Goh HS, Goh CR, Rauff A, Foong WC (1987) Clinico-pathological prognostic factors of large bowel cancer in Singapore: a multivariate analysis. Ann Acad Med Singap 16:437–440
Porta M, Gallen M, Malats N, Planas J (1991) Influence of ‘diagnostic delay’ upon cancer survival: an analysis of five tumour sites. J Epidemiol Community Health 45:225–230
Auvinen A (1992) Social class and colon cancer survival in Finland. Cancer 70:402–409
Fernandez E, Porta M, Malats N, Belloc J, Gallen M (2002) Symptom-to-diagnosis interval and survival in cancers of the digestive tract. Dig Dis Sci 47:2434–2440
Stapley S, Peters TJ, Sharp D, Hamilton W (2006) The mortality of colorectal cancer in relation to the initial symptom at presentation to primary care and to the duration of symptoms: a cohort study using medical records. Br J Cancer 95:1321–1325
Rupassara KS, Ponnusamy S, Withanage N, Milewski PJ (2006) A paradox explained? Patients with delayed diagnosis of symptomatic colorectal cancer have good prognosis. Color Dis 8:423–429
Ramos M, Esteva M, Cabeza E, Campillo C, Llobera J, Aguilo A (2007) Relationship of diagnostic and therapeutic delay with survival in colorectal cancer: a review. Eur J Cancer 43:2467–2478
Tørring ML, Frydenberg M, Hansen RP, Olesen F, Hamilton W, Vedsted P (2011) Time to diagnosis and mortality in colorectal cancer: a cohort study in primary care. Br J Cancer 104:934–940
Murchie P, Raja EA, Brewster DH, Campbell NC, Ritchie LD, Roberston R, Samuel L, Gray N, Lee AJ (2014) Time from first presentation in primary care to treatment of symptomatic colorectal cancer: effect on disease stage and survival. Br J Cancer 111:461–469
Tekkis PP, Kinsman R, Thompson MR, Stamatakis JD (2004) The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland study of large bowel obstruction caused by colorectal cancer. Ann Surg. 240(1):76–81
Simmonds P, Turner Lesley RM, George S (2000) Surgery for colorectal cancer in elderly patients: a systematic review. Colorectal cancer collaborative group. Lancet 356:968–974
Fielding LP, Phillips RK, Hittinger R (1989) Factors influencing mortality after curative resection for large bowel cancer in elderly patients. The Large Bowel Cancer Project. Lancet 333(8638):595–597
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
R Patel: analysis and interpretation of data, writing manuscript.
J E Anderson: study design, analysis and interpretation of data, writing and reviewing manuscript.
C McKenzie: Clinical Quality Co-ordinator, Lanarkshire Health Board.
M Simpson: data collection.
N Singh: data collection and analysis.
F Ruzvidzo: data collection and analysis.
P Sharma: data collection and analysis.
R Scott: data collection and analysis, review of manuscript.
A Macdonald: study conception and design, analysis and interpretation of data, writing manuscript.
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Patel, R., Anderson, J.E., McKenzie, C. et al. Compliance with the 62-day target does not improve long-term survival. Int J Colorectal Dis 33, 65–69 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-017-2930-5
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-017-2930-5