Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Does anastomotic leakage impair functional results and quality of life after laparoscopic sphincter-saving total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer? A case-matched study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Colorectal Disease Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Anastomotic leakage (AL) after total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer is suspected to alter function. However, very few reports have been devoted to this problem. The aim of this study was to assess the influence of AL on function and quality of life (QoL) after laparoscopic TME for cancer.

Methods

A total of 170 patients who underwent laparoscopic TME and sphincter-saving surgery for mid and low rectal cancer were included (67 % after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy). Twenty-one patients with AL were assessed for function and QoL (Short Form 36 (SF-36), Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life (FIQL), CR-29, and Wexner’s score) at the most recent follow-up. These patients were matched to 42 patients without AL according to sex, body mass index, ypTNM, radiotherapy, and type of anastomosis.

Results

After a median follow-up of 30 months, AL significantly impaired physical activity (SF-36) (p = 0.004), self-respect (FIQL) (p = 0.029), wear pad’s score (Wexner’s score) (p = 0.043), and blood and mucus in stool score (CR-29) (p = 0.001). Overall Wexner’s score did not show any significant difference in the two groups, 8.9 in AL patients vs. 11.6 in patients without AL (p = 0.1).

Conclusion

AL significantly impairs both functional results and quality of life after laparoscopic sphincter-saving TME for rectal cancer. However, the observed difference was only limited, leading to similar outcomes on most of the tested scores. Patients with AL should be warned that if they initially experience severely impaired results, outcomes tend with time to become similar to those observed in noncomplicated patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rullier E, Laurent C, Bretagnol F, Rullier A, Vendrely V, Zerbib F (2005) Sphincter-saving resection for all rectal carcinomas: The end of the 2-cm distal rule. Ann Surg 241:465–469

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bokey EL, Ojerskog B, Chapuis PH, Dent OF, Newland RC, Sinclair G (1999) Local recurrence after curative excision of the rectum for cancer without adjuvant therapy: Role of total anatomical dissection. Br J Surg 86:1164–1170

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Martin ST, Heneghan HM, Winter DC (2012) Systematic review of outcomes after intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer. Br J Surg 99:603–612

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Matthiessen P, Hallbook O, Rutegard J, Simert G, Sjodahl R (2007) Defunctioning stoma reduces symptomatic anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection of the rectum for cancer: A randomized multicenter trial. Ann Surg 246:207–214

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Yeh CY, Changchien CR, Wang JY, Chen JS, Chen HH, Chiang JM et al (2005) Pelvic drainage and other risk factors for leakage after elective anterior resection in rectal cancer patients: A prospective study of 978 patients. Ann Surg 241:9–13

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Peeters KC, Tollenaar RA, Marijnen CA, Klein Kranenbarg E, Steup WH, Wiggers T et al (2005) Risk factors for anastomotic failure after total mesorectal excision of rectal cancer. Br J Surg 92:211–216

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Alves A, Panis Y, Mathieu P, Mantion G, Kwiatkowski F, Slim K (2005) Postoperative mortality and morbidity in french patients undergoing colorectal surgery: Results of a prospective multicenter study. Arch Surg 140:278–284

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Matthiessen P, Hallbook O, Rutegard J, Sjodahl R (2006) Population-based study of risk factors for postoperative death after anterior resection of the rectum. Br J Surg 93:498–503

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. den Dulk M, Smit M, Peeters KC, Kranenbarg EM, Rutten HJ, Wiggers T et al (2007) A multivariate analysis of limiting factors for stoma reversal in patients with rectal cancer entered into the total mesorectal excision (TME) trial: A retrospective study. Lancet Oncol 8:297–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Maggiori L, Bretagnol F, Lefevre JH, Ferron M, Vicaut E, Panis Y (2011) Conservative management is associated with a decreased risk of definitive stoma after anastomotic leakage complicating sphincter-saving resection for rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 13:632–637

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bell SW, Walker KG, Rickard MJ, Sinclair G, Dent OF, Chapuis PH et al (2003) Anastomotic leakage after curative anterior resection results in a higher prevalence of local recurrence. Br J Surg 90:1261–1266

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Mirnezami A, Mirnezami R, Chandrakumaran K, Sasapu K, Sagar P, Finan P (2011) Increased local recurrence and reduced survival from colorectal cancer following anastomotic leak: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 253:890–899

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bittorf B, Stadelmaier U, Merkel S, Hohenberger W, Matzel KE (2003) Does anastomotic leakage affect functional outcome after rectal resection for cancer? Langenbecks Arch Surg 387:406–410

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Riss S, Stremitzer S, Riss K, Mittlbock M, Bergmann M, Stift A (2011) Pelvic organ function and quality of life after anastomotic leakage following rectal cancer surgery. Wien Klin Wochenschr 123:53–57

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hallbook O, Sjodahl R (1996) Anastomotic leakage and functional outcome after anterior resection of the rectum. Br J Surg 83:60–62

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Nesbakken A, Nygaard K, Lunde OC (2001) Outcome and late functional results after anastomotic leakage following mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 88:400–404

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ashburn JH, Stocchi L, Kiran RP, Dietz DW, Remzi FH (2013) Consequences of anastomotic leak after restorative proctectomy for cancer: Effect on long-term function and quality of life. Dis Colon Rectum 56:275–280

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD (1992) The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 30:473–483

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Rockwood TH, Church JM, Fleshman JW, Kane RL, Mavrantonis C, Thorson AG et al (2000) Fecal incontinence quality of life scale: Quality of life instrument for patients with fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 43:9–16, discussion -7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Whistance RN, Conroy T, Chie W, Costantini A, Sezer O, Koller M et al (2009) Clinical and psychometric validation of the EORTC QLQ-CR29 questionnaire module to assess health-related quality of life in patients with colorectal cancer. Eur J Cancer 45:3017–3026

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Jorge JM, Wexner SD (1993) Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 36:77–97

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Montedori A, Cirocchi R, Farinella E, Sciannameo F, Abraha I. (2010) Covering ileo- or colostomy in anterior resection for rectal carcinoma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev: CD006878.

  23. Matthiessen P, Hallbook O, Andersson M, Rutegard J, Sjodahl R (2004) Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after anterior resection of the rectum. Colorectal Dis 6:462–469

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Motson RW, Khan JS, Arulampalam TH, Austin RC, Lacey N, Sizer B (2011) Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision following long course chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 25:1753–1760

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hirst N, Tiernan J, Millner P, Jayne D. (2013) Systematic review of methods to predict and detect anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis.

  26. Graf W, Ekstrom K, Glimelius B, Pahlman L (1996) A pilot study of factors influencing bowel function after colorectal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 39:744–749

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Parc Y, Zutshi M, Zalinski S, Ruppert R, Furst A, Fazio VW (2009) Preoperative radiotherapy is associated with worse functional results after coloanal anastomosis for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 52:2004–2014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Lewis WG, Holdsworth PJ, Stephenson BM, Finan PJ, Johnston D (1992) Role of the rectum in the physiological and clinical results of coloanal and colorectal anastomosis after anterior resection for rectal carcinoma. Br J Surg 79:1082–1086

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Hallbook O, Pahlman L, Krog M, Wexner SD, Sjodahl R (1996) Randomized comparison of straight and colonic J pouch anastomosis after low anterior resection. Ann Surg 224:58–65

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Machado M, Nygren J, Goldman S, Ljungqvist O (2003) Similar outcome after colonic pouch and side-to-end anastomosis in low anterior resection for rectal cancer: A prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg 238:214–220

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Fazio VW, Kiran RP, Remzi FH, Coffey JC, Heneghan HM, Kirat HT et al (2013) Ileal pouch anal anastomosis: Analysis of outcome and quality of life in 3707 patients. Ann Surg 257:679–685

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Bregendahl S, Emmertsen KJ, Lous J, Laurberg S (2013) Bowel dysfunction after low anterior resection with and without neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer: A population-based cross-sectional study. Colorectal Dis 15:1130–1139

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Pachler J, Wille-Jorgensen P (2012) Quality of life after rectal resection for cancer, with or without permanent colostomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 12, CD004323

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Carmona JA, Ortiz H, Perez-Cabanas I (1991) Alterations in anorectal function after anterior resection for cancer of the rectum. Int J Colorectal Dis 6:108–110

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Colorectal Surgery, Pôle des Maladies de l’Appareil Digestif (PMAD), Beaujon Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), University Denis Diderot (Paris VII), 100 boulevard du Général Leclerc, 92110, Clichy, France

    Cécile Mongin, Léon Maggiori, Julie Agostini, Marianne Ferron & Yves Panis

Authors
  1. Cécile Mongin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Léon Maggiori
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Julie Agostini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Marianne Ferron
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yves Panis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yves Panis.

Additional information

What does this paper had contributed to the literature?

This case-matched study highlighted a slight effect of anastomotic leakage on functional results and quality of life after laparoscopic sphincter-saving total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mongin, C., Maggiori, L., Agostini, J. et al. Does anastomotic leakage impair functional results and quality of life after laparoscopic sphincter-saving total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer? A case-matched study. Int J Colorectal Dis 29, 459–467 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-014-1833-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-014-1833-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation